4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 04:38
421
-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:15
426
-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:19
428
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:15
428
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.37%
avg views ÷ 421 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.4
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (23 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
221
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13
76.5%
❤🔥
4
23.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Играем в «Демонов леса. Обретение суперсилы»
Сегодня, 5 августа (среда) в 18 00 мск
Что будет на онлайн-игре?
1. Вы сыграете в одну из страшных сказок «Демонов леса» - «Ободранная старуха», чтобы:
- выявить ваши ограничивающие установки, которые мешают вам получить желаемое, увеличить доход
- найдем суперсилу, которая поможет достичь заветной цели
2. Вы научитесь не только анализировать страшные сказки, но и бр…
Вот для этого мы и делаем на ВСЕХ этапах сверку с задачами ЖИВЫХ людей.
Мы постоянно тестируем гипотезы - пока не попадем в яблочко.
То есть в живую задачу живого человека.
Как мы узнаем, что попали не в бровь, а в глаз в то самое яблочко?
Люди купят, скажут друг другу сами как амбассадоры, потечет сарафанное радио и деньги в бизнес.
Ибо рынок - это абстракция. А ЛЮДИ - это конкретика, живые люди, у которых есть ко…
Буквально месяц назад с партнером об этом говорили. Я очень много трачу времени на продукт, а он не залетает. Послушала ещё и Оскара Хартмана, он говорил о том, что многие его продукты люди купили ещё на этапе разработки. Потому что им надо было уже здесь и сейчас, и люди не готовы ждать, пока появится упаковка, реклама, они уже сейчас готовы купить.
Ты в матрице... тесте гипотез😳
Кто-то из вас заметил, что последние три дня вы находитесь внутри эксперимента? 😄
Именно так вы можете проверять свои гипотезы о продукте или услуге - прямо в вашем блоге, в обычном опросе. И это самый быстрый способ. (ну почти😁).
В зрительном зале реалити я дала крутой подарок - список форматов, как можно тестировать гипотезы, кроме таких опросов. Что-то знакомое, что-то неожиданное…
Как сделать так, чтобы клиенты сами находили меня, а не мне приходилось постоянно их искать?88%
Как находить клиентов без навязчивых продаж и уговоров?13%
Как запустить свой продукт и получить первые продажи?25%
Почему я все время начинаю, но не довожу запуск до результата?13%
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вайбкодинг в субботу, пока у всех гуд вайбз и апероль.
Нет, с ума я не сошла. Во вторник сдала налоговую декларацию.
Цифры, конечно, отрезвляют. И включают креативное мышление.
Вайбкодинг, в моем случае, это не только про экономию,
хотя что уж скрывать, пару тыщ евро сэкономлю.
Главное - Claude про мощный буст ускорения.
В Claude появились скиллы - сама до вчера не знала, что это😳.
Моими словами, это значит, можн…
Авторский алгоритм создания продукта, который ищут клиенты
1 этап. Слушаю себя (эксперта)
Создаю макет пути клиента от точки А до большого результата.
✅ Готовы 12 шагов — моими словами.
⬇️
2 этап. Слушаю клиента (рынок)
Проверяю этот путь на живых людях.
Ищу, какие шаги они действительно хотят пройти прямо сейчас.
❗️СПОЙЛЕР❗️сейчас я этим опросом выше как раз и "обстукиваю" об вас, об рынок, какие шаги вы как …
Истомина | Бизнес как игра pinned «Представьте, что у вас появилась волшебная палочка. Но есть одно условие. Можно решить только одну задачу в своем бизнесе. Какую выберете?»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gowowbusiness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как сделать так, чтобы клиенты сами находили меня, а не мне приходилось постоянно их искать?88%
Как находить клиентов без навязчивых продаж и уговоров?13%
Как запустить свой продукт и получить первые продажи?25%
Почему я все время начинаю, но не довожу запуск до результата?13%
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Представьте, что у вас появилась волшебная палочка. Но есть одно условие. Можно решить только одну задачу в своем бизнесе. Какую выберете?
1️⃣ Почему меня не выбирают и идут покупать у других?0%
2️⃣ Как сделать личный бренд узнаваемым и стать №1 в своей нише?0%
4️⃣ Почему я не довожу проекты до результата? Как перестать создавать «в стол» и начать продавать?0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 608,088 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Истомина | Бизнес как игра” (@gowowbusiness), 421 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gowowbusiness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
