File, posted without a caption

Channel
GoudenToekomstπ (Investeren & Persoonlijke ontwikkeling)
@goudentoekomst
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
371subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001556445876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goudentoekomst |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goudentoekomst |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 371 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 369 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 369 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 18.0%
- avg views Γ· 371 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 66.8
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.01%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2026 β 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,068 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Mededeling π¨ βββββββββββββββββββ Binnen het lidmaatschap (https://lidmaatschap.gtoekomst.nl) staat weer een nieuwe beursupdate online. In deze beursupdate heb ik het over het meest populaire onderwerp op de beurs momenteel: AI. Hieronder staat de presentatie die ik in de video bespreek. Inmiddels staat er binnen het lidmaatschap meer dan 6 uur aan videocontent over beleggen en persoonlijke ontwikkeling. Als je je aaβ¦
De opties zijn eigenlijk hetzelfde, waarbij B alleen de meer gunstige versie van A is (er is immers bij beide een verschuiving van twee procent en 20.000 euro). Ondanks dat kiezen veel mensen bij A de eerste optie en bij B de laatste optie. De keuze bij B heeft uiteraard alles te maken met het zekerheidseffect. Ik denk dat het goed is om je bewust te zijn van deze effecten, ze kunnen namelijk leiden tot irrationele β¦
Algemeen onderwerp π§ Uit boek: Ons feilbare denken βββββββββββββββββββ Waarom we kansen niet rationeel beoordelen. βββββββββββββββββββ Als we te maken krijgen met een onzekere uitkomst, dan geven we uitkomsten met een hogere waarschijnlijkheid logischerwijs meer gewicht. De verwachte waarde van een onzekere uitkomst bereken je namelijk door de uitkomsten te vermenigvuldigen met hun gewicht en vervolgens op te tellen.β¦
#MotivationMonday πͺπ» βββββββββββββββββββ βTurn your wounds into wisdom.β βββββββββββββββββββ Pijn en tegenslagen zijn onvermijdelijke onderdelen van het leven. Deze quote moedigt je aan om je niet door die pijn te laten tegenhouden, maar het juist te gebruiken als een bron voor groei en wijsheid. Tegenslagen bieden vaak waardevolle lessen die je helpen om jezelf in de toekomst te verbeteren. Door moeilijke ervaringenβ¦
Mededeling π¨ βββββββββββββββββββ Ik heb weer een nieuwe video op YouTube geplaatst. In deze video leg ik uit dat het belangrijk is om op te passen dat je niet te veel informatie tot je neemt en daarnaast bespreek ik twee criteria van Timothy Ferriss die informatie nuttig maken. Klik op de volgende link om de video te bekijken: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lUfHyw0Ylc.
Mededeling π¨ βββββββββββββββββββ Ik heb zojuist een nieuwe transactie uitgevoerd binnen mijn accumulerende aandelenportfolio. Leden (zie https://lidmaatschap.gtoekomst.nl) hebben hiervan een mail ontvangen. Lid worden is mogelijk vanaf 13,75 euro per maand (er geldt een 30 dagen geld-terug-garantie).
File, posted without a caption
Mededeling π¨ βββββββββββββββββββ Binnen het GoudenToekomst-lidmaatschap (https://lidmaatschap.gtoekomst.nl/) staat er een nieuwe video online. In deze video bespreek ik een waardevolle verandering in mindset als belegger: van het kopen van aandelen naar het kopen van bedrijven. Hieronder staat de presentatie die ik in de video bespreek. Binnen het lidmaatschap krijg je toegang tot mijn twee aandelenportfolioβs en excβ¦
Algemeen onderwerp π§ Uit boek: The Stoic Path to Wealth βββββββββββββββββββ Waarom emoties belangrijker zijn dan je beleggingsstrategie. βββββββββββββββββββ Veel mensen die beleggen zoeken naar de βgeheime formuleβ, de beleggingsstrategie waarmee ze een bovengemiddeld rendement kunnen behalen. Beleggers blijven hier vaak lang naar zoeken en dit zorgt ervoor dat ze niet consistent investeren. Deze zoektocht leidt er β¦
#MotivationMonday πͺπ» βββββββββββββββββββ βThe road to success is always under construction.β βββββββββββββββββββ Deze quote maakt duidelijk dat succes geen eindbestemming is, maar een continu proces. Op verschillende gebieden in het leven, zoals je carriΓ¨re, gezondheid, financiΓ«n of relaties, is er altijd ruimte om te blijven groeien en jezelf verder te ontwikkelen. Juist daarom is een groeimindset zo belangrijk. Ricβ¦
Mededeling π¨ βββββββββββββββββββ Er staat een nieuwe video online op mijn YouTube-kanaal! In deze video bespreek ik onder andere de psychologie van beginnende beleggers: waarom beginnende beleggers vaak hoog in de markt stappen en vervolgens laag uitstappen. Je kunt de video bekijken door op de volgende link te klikken: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD1FiwXqzHQ&pp=0gcJCaMLAYcqIYzv.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goudentoekomst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 1,346,475 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βGoudenToekomstπ (Investeren & Persoonlijke ontwikkeling)β (@goudentoekomst), 371 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goudentoekomst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.