🤔 Яннис не подходит «Майами»? Самый ли это неадаптивный игрок НБА? 👉 Поговорили об этом в эфире нового Доброго вечера. Смотрите в записи, если пропустили. 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
❤14🤔7👍1
Channel
@got_ball
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
118,247subscribers
-1,614 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001673571257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @got_ball |
| Description | ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ! Забирайте фрибет: https://p.winline.ru/s/himg1p4xTr?statid=2553_&sub4=gotball&promocode=GOTBALL По вопросам сотрудничества и предложениям: [email protected] Единственный аккаунт для связи: @got_ball_team № 4968958364 |
| Created | 7 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/got_ball |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @thewholesport | 24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.4 hours | this entry (17–7) |
| @tennis_bolshe | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 17 minutes | @tennis_bolshe (6–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,747 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 118,247 | +5 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 118,242 | -18 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 118,260 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:21 | 118,261 | -20 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 118,281 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:47 | 118,280 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 118,271 | -18 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:34 | 118,289 | -109 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:44 | 118,398 | -46 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 118,444 | -71 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 118,515 | +81 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 118,434 | +127 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:01 | 118,307 | +26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 118,281 | +12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 118,269 | +15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:56 | 118,254 | +46 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 118,208 | +44 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 118,164 | +230 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 117,934 | +58 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 117,876 | first reading |
1,910 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,910 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,503,290 |
| Reactions total | 160,233 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 396 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
241,780 reactions across 978 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91,209 | 37.7% | |
| 🔥 | 42,408 | 17.5% | |
| 😁 | 36,696 | 15.2% | |
| 👍 | 13,607 | 5.63% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12,696 | 5.25% | |
| 🙉 | 7,922 | 3.28% | |
| 🤯 | 6,221 | 2.57% | |
| 😭 | 5,319 | 2.20% | |
| 💔 | 3,654 | 1.51% | |
| 💯 | 3,070 | 1.27% | |
| 😱 | 2,604 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 2,066 | 0.854% | |
| 🤔 | 1,826 | 0.755% | |
| 👀 | 1,688 | 0.698% | |
| 🤩 | 1,631 | 0.675% | |
| 👏 | 1,588 | 0.657% | |
| 🤷 | 1,463 | 0.605% | |
| 😍 | 1,116 | 0.462% | |
| 🙏 | 1,014 | 0.419% | |
| ⚡ | 774 | 0.32% | |
| 11 further kinds | 3,208 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 978 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241,780 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvCh14h | 2 | 19 October 2026 | 21 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqvgxjNN | 2 | 2 November 2026 | 4 November 2026 |
| 2Vtzquzg2Gu | 1 | 17 October 2026 | 17 October 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv5LM4H | 1 | 7 October 2026 | 7 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqvBKn9r | 1 | 30 September 2026 | 30 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvZga1B | 1 | 14 October 2026 | 14 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqviTWTn | 1 | 29 September 2026 | 29 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqvx9UUm | 1 | 13 October 2026 | 13 October 2026 |
| 2Vtzqw3qKEE | 1 | 7 November 2026 | 7 November 2026 |
| 2VtzqwJdGds | 1 | 27 October 2026 | 27 October 2026 |
| 2VtzqwV7BcY | 1 | 26 September 2026 | 26 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqwk3La1 | 1 | 4 October 2026 | 4 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 1 further token is held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 109 of 672 posts held from the last 30 days (16.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤔 Яннис не подходит «Майами»? Самый ли это неадаптивный игрок НБА? 👉 Поговорили об этом в эфире нового Доброго вечера. Смотрите в записи, если пропустили. 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
❤14🤔7👍1
💰 Леброн Джеймс и Кевин Дюрант решили инвестировать в будущее баскетбола Звёзды НБА поддержали запуск новой молодёжной лиги Futures Basketball League (FBL), дебютный сезон которой пройдёт с апреля по август 2027 года. 🔶 12 команд и 120 лучших баскетболистов США до 18 лет 🔶 10 игровых уикендов с финальным турниром за чемпионство 🔶 Молодые игроки смогут зарабатывать на рекламных контрактах и даже получать долю в само…
❤140👍28👏19🤷5🙉4👻2
🚫 Блок бай Джеймс (Брайс) Младший сын Леброна Джеймса поставил мощнейший блок в матче «Аризоны» против «Северной Аризоны». Брайс эффектно встретил Лукаса Тукама, который уже собирался забить сверху. 🔶 3 очка (1/3 с игры) 🔶 2 передачи 🔶 2 перехвата 🔶 1 блок-шот Кажется, защитные гены Леброна передались по наследству 😂 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
❤96🔥33❤🔥10👍6🙉5🤩3😁3👏1
📺 Расписание трансляций игровой ночи Знамбо принял вызов Абаки! Сегодня Игорь Знаменский прокомментирует матч «Голден Стейт» против «Хьюстона». А кроме того, нас ждут ещё девять матчей НБА! Среди главных вывесок — противостояние «Портленда» и «Оклахомы», а также встреча «Нью-Йорка» с «Кливлендом». Трансляции смотрите в нашей группе ВК 👈 03:00 | «Торонто» — «Бостон» 🎙 Дмитрий Сидоренко 03:00 | «Индиана» — «Вашинг…
❤51🔥22👍10😁1
😂 Шакил О'Нил решил выяснить, станет ли он королём Англии, если женится на королеве На шоу Джеймса Кордена Шак задал, наверное, самый неожиданный вопрос. 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
😁207❤32👏3👍1
Что не так с «Филадельфией»? Несмотря на хороший баланс побед, нападение «Филадельфии» не работает весь сезон. Лидеры просто плохо сочетаются друг с другом. Каждый хочет играть с мячом в руках, команде сильно не хватает движения. И снайперов. Леброн Джеймс (24% из-за дуги) и Джоэл Эмбиид (12% из-за дуги) совсем потеряли бросок. Остальные стартеры попадают более-менее, но каждый из тройки Тайриз Макси, Джейлен Брау…
❤109💯52😭15🤔12👍6🙉4❤🔥2🔥1
🔥 Пол Джордж ответил всем, кто считает его хуже Джейлена Брауна Форвард «Бостона» выдал мощный перформанс против «Филадельфии»: 36 очков, 55% попаданий из-за дуги и 5 подборов. Хватило ли Джорджу такого выступления, чтобы принести «Селтикс» победу? Смотрите 10-минутные обзоры этого и других матчей игровой ночи 👇 🏀 Милуоки х Нью-Йорк 🏀 Бостон х Филадельфия 🏀 Клипперс х Финикс (скоро) 🔥 Майами х Юта 🔥 Орландо х Сак…
❤115🔥61❤🔥17👍6
🔥 Тейтум подошёл поприветствовать Брауна перед первой встречей после обмена — Джейлен просто не ответил. А дальше напряжение перенеслось на паркет: личные дуэли, эмоции и Тейтум, который спустя восемь лет снова полез забивать сверху через Леброна Плюс Дэмиан Лиллард включил Дэймтайм, Эйкафф продолжил зажигать, а у «Голден Стэйт» появились варианты по Кристапсу Порзингису. Включайте новый выпуск #ВзялМячNews 👇 😉 Yo…
❤59🔥20👍13
😅 Джордж «тепло» встретил фанатов в Филадельфии! Впервые вернувшись в город после ухода из «Сиксерс», Пол успел поконфликовать с болельщиками команды. 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
❤161😁135🔥30🙉11😎6👍4🤯4🥰3
😁 Этот парень ОБОЖАЕТ хот-доги Кажется, на матче «Сакраменто» нашли их самого преданного фаната. Хоть с чего-то можно кайфануть болельщикам «Кингз» 😅 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
😁194❤60🤗21🔥7❤🔥1🤷1🙉1
🥹 Момент, который он запомнит на всю жизнь! Болельщик «Оклахомы» прилетел из Австралии, преодолев почти 12 000 километров, чтобы увидеть игру Алекса Карузо. Вот что значит настоящая любовь к баскетболу 🙌 🏀 ПОДПИШИСЬ — ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВЁТ БАСКЕТБОЛ!
❤315🔥108🏆27👍9❤🔥5🤗4😁1
Девять лет эти парни играли в одной команде: 5 Финалов Востока, 2 Финала НБА и долгожданны Титул 2024. И вот впервые за всё время мы увидели их на паркете друг против друга, да еще и в составах команд, которые бились за первое место в конференции. И теперь — девять "takeaway" моментов, выводов, по противостоянию Тэйтума и Брауна в рамках игры Бостон — Филадельфия: 1. Противостояния не случилось. Тот самый Браун, к…
❤171👍52🔥24🤩4💯3❤🔥1🤷1🙉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,910 posts we hold for @got_ball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@got_ball edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что не так с Яннисом Адетокумбо? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Верите, что «Портленд» выйдет в плей-офф в этом сезоне?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сыграет ли Джоэл Эмбиид 65+ матчей в этом сезоне?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой момент стал самым смешным на прошлой неделе? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Остаются ли Шай и Йокич реальными претендентами на MVP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Взял Мяч” (@got_ball), 118,247 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/got_ball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.