Не надейтесь, что новая норма как-то повлияет особо на исход событий. Будьте блительны! Дело именно в том, что там в большей степени работает 135-ФЗ, а не 44-ФЗ!

Channel
Госзакупки. Практика и стратегии
@goszakup44
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
228subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003182716872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goszakup44 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goszakup44 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 228 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 224 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 228 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 228 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.9%
- avg views ÷ 228 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 88.6
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.34%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (13 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 709 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
➡️ Неспешно (спешить пока некуда) рассматриваю изменения в 44-ФЗ. Первое, что вступает в силу (уже вступило), это добавление в часть 15 статьи 93. Полностью часть 15 будет звучать так: «В пределах ограничений годового объема закупок и цены контракта, установленных пунктами 4, 5 и 28 части 1, частью 12 настоящей статьи, может быть заключено несколько контрактов в отношении однородных либо идентичных товаров, работ и …
❗️Разъяснения Верховного Суда Российской Федерации теперь становятся обязательными https://zakon.ru/blog/2026/08/05/razyasneniya_verhovnogo_suda_rossijskoj_federacii_teper_stanovyatsya_obyazatelnymi 🤭 Красиво плывет вот та группа в полосатых купальниках Но время покажет... 📌 Что это значит на деле: - Снижение региональных различий в применении права. По однотипным спорам суды разных субъектов РФ будут в большей с…
👏1🔥1
Заключение контракта со вторым участником закупки без решения ФАС о включении информации в РНП по первоначальному исполнителю. Как Минфин оценил такое предложение? Рассмотрев предложения по внесению изменений в Закон № 44-ФЗ, регулятор указал: ● когда ФАС России решает вопрос о включении исполнителя контракта в РНП, он оценивает законность одностороннего отказа от исполнения (расторжения контракта) по инициативе за…
Почему заказчики не расторгаются по соглашению сторон ответ 👆
⚖️ Прокуратура добилась признания соглашения о расторжении контракта недействительным Заказчик заключил контракт на поставку двадцати учебных БПЛА на общую сумму 2,8 млн руб. В ходе приемки товара комиссия установила, что вместо встроенной камеры Runcam Split3-lite с поддержкой записи Full HD 1080p поставлен товар с аналоговой камерой Runcan Nano3, страной происхождения которого является Китай. Поставщик утверждал…
⚡️Беспилотники атаковали склады Wildberries, — СМИ. — В Тамбовской области удар пришелся по логистическому центру Wildberries; — В Электростали дроны атаковали склады этой же компании – начался сильный пожар; — Во Владимире дрон попал в дом – начался пожар, идёт эвакуация; — О налёте также сообщали жители Ногинска. СК РФ возбудил уголовные дела о терактах в связи с атаками дронов на логистические центры Wildberries…
😱1
Кто пользовался валберисом доставками для госзакупок осознаем, что всё, что не уехало уже не приедет. Ищем варианты для исполнения контрактов.
🤯2🤔1
Мошенники поставили в больницы РФ контрафактные медперчатки на 2,5 млрд Два с половиной миллиарда рублей могли похитить из бюджета организаторы дерзкой аферы с контрафактными медицинскими перчатками. Под арестом уже двое фигурантов. Годами они выдавали подделки из Китая за товар отечественного производства. Полсотни регионов заключили с поставщиками госконтракты. Как мошенникам так долго удавалось вести криминальный…
Крымское межрегиональное УФАС предупреждает о новой схеме мошенничества Крымское межрегиональное УФАС предупреждает о новой схеме мошенничества Уважаемые участники закупок и государственные заказчики! В последнее время в адрес Крымского межрегионального УФАС поступают сообщения от заказчиков. Неизвестные лица под видом ФАС России рассылают письма. Подобные сообщения – фальсификация и мошенничество. Где искать вс…
⚖️ Введение санкций само по себе не оправдывает срыв поставки по госконтракту, напомнили суды Стороны заключили контракт на поставку медоборудования. Поставщик не доставил часть товара, поэтому заказчик начислил ему штраф и обратился за его взысканием в суд. Поставщик попросил списать сумму штрафа, заявив, что нарушение произошло из-за введения санкций. В подтверждение этого довода он представил письма производител…
➡️Ничтожные контракты: пособие для поставщиков С помощью ИИ собрал и структурировал в одном пособии практику, которая мне известна по признанию контрактов и договоров ничтожными. Это самая подробная памятка для поставщиков. И мне кажется это пособие должно стать настольным по оценке рисков при заключении контрактов. В пособии собрал комментарии экспертов и их взгляд на ситуацию. Спасибо Юлии Лещук, Татьяне Дунае…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @goszakup44. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 667,988 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Госзакупки. Практика и стратегии” (@goszakup44), 228 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goszakup44.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.