Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gossip girl🐁

Channel

Gossip girl🐁

@gossipgirl1111

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

319subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190284268
TypeChannel
Username@gossipgirl1111
Created8 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gossipgirl1111

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3173193187 August 2026 — 317 subscribers8 August 2026 — 317 subscribers24 August 2026 — 319 subscribers30 August 2026 — 318 subscribers9 September 2026 — 319 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 317–319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 20:20319+1
30 Aug 2026, 21:26318-1
24 Aug 2026, 02:34319+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:33317no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:51317first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

300 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11739.0%
😢8127.0%
❤6521.7%
🥰175.67%
🤮72.33%
💋51.67%
💘31.00%
🤔20.667%
👎10.333%
🔥10.333%
😱10.333%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2022 to 10 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2025, 14:32 UTC≈1,380 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня 10-ое число, а это означает, что пора напомнить, что я не ненавижу ни Настю, ни Руслана, никого из блогеров))) В тиктоке активно возвращают 2020-21 года, тренды оттуда, поэтому я тоже решила запрыгнуть в этот поезд и вспомнить, какое прикольное было время)

❤35💋5💘3

8 Jul 2022, 15:27 UTC≈5,160 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну, в такой ебанутый день я напомню, что у меня другой канал(личный), но я там ахуеваю со всего происходящего. https://t.me/zahodi1212 Ну а так, полный пиздец какой-то

❤8😱1

10 Jun 2022, 19:46 UTC≈5,550 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ПРОЧТИТЕ ПОСТ ДО КОНЦА! Этот момент наконец настал. Я долго решалась на это. И хоть сейчас мне грустно(и даже очень), но пришло время. Всё рано или поздно заканчивается. Каждый светлячёк когда-нибудь перестаёт светить, как говорится. Да, канал закрывается. Это мой последний пост здесь. Интерес к блогерам пропал и навряд ли вернётся. Энтузиазма всё меньше. Посты не такие интересные, как были раньше, думаю вы и сами эт…

😢48❤3👍1

10 Jun 2022, 16:21 UTC≈3,040 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не изменяем традиции, сегодня 10-ое число и я напоминаю, что никого не ненавижу! Всем хорошего вечера!♡

🥰16👍2

7 Jun 2022, 19:20 UTC≈3,190 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Даш, иди и дай в долг деньги подруге, она твоя подруга, в конце концов. Я ненавижу, когда блогеры кидают номер карты и выпрашивают деньги у подписчиков. Идите и берите деньги в долг, почему люди должны твоей подруге кидать просто так деньги? В чём прикол?

👍41❤3

3 Jun 2022, 11:54 UTC≈2,370 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Они милые! Столько контента от них

❤10🥰1

3 Jun 2022, 11:54 UTC≈2,680 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bloodxglassPhoto

фоточки руслана с алиной со свадьбы даши и юлика. ❤️👅 #𝖼𝗆𝗁 & #𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺

👍18🤮7🔥1

31 May 2022, 12:03 UTC≈2,440 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой родной город У меня слов нет

😢33

29 May 2022, 16:43 UTC≈2,080 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍9🤔2

29 May 2022, 16:43 UTC≈2,050 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рекомендую вам послушать песню про Руслана и дедлайны. Прекрасная песня с прекрасным посылом!) Интерактив от преданных фанатов Руслана)

👍6

26 May 2022, 18:53 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @egorpobirskyVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

26 May 2022, 18:53 UTC≈1,800 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бля, если у меня когда-нибудь будет свадьба, то я тоже хочу, чтобы Воровайки пели на ней

👍16❤1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gossipgirl1111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gossip girl🐁” (@gossipgirl1111), 319 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gossipgirl1111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.