Channel
@gossip_bllknetsandblogs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
246subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003199044166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gossip_bllknetsandblogs |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gossip_bllknetsandblogs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 246 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 251 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 252 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 249 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 239 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 239 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
86 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 33 | 38.4% | |
| 🐳 | 17 | 19.8% | |
| 😇 | 17 | 19.8% | |
| custom 5433856365061746058 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| custom 5262894126692586803 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.98% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✖️✖️✖️🌟🔤🔤🔤🔣🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 (🤩) 🥹О БОЖЕ ЧТО ЭТО !? НЕУЖЕЛИ ЭТО .. ➿. . .🌟🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ➖elegram ➖etwork ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ (🤩)🥹The Pitt.com — это сеть телеграмм каналов по фандому "Больница Питт" / "The Pitt", медицинскому телесериалу. Сюжет сети располагается во время и после второго сезона, являясь каноничным. Особенность сети заключается в разрешен…
Signed Rest. Kasu
Назовите без шуток самые известные личности бллк фд, без "я". Супостаты всем итак известны. Вот чтобы прямо как элизия ирл наги или та тётя 33 года снимающая про саэ, мне для благих целей. Неанон Асаю (сбогом) : ➛ #ТЕЙК | @gossip_bllknetsandblogs | @podslyshkateyki3_bot - ,, `
Signed 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝖪𝖺𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 #Ланичкафанномеродин
😆обро пожаловать в блог 🙂🥲😚😀🤓😇🥸 😊🥳☺️🤣🥹😍😀 —— меня зовут Кайзер и я тот, кто демонстрирует “невозможное”🌟 Здeсь вы найдeтe всё, что ваm нужно знать обо mнe — главноm футбольноm гeнии и лeгeндe соврemeнности. Мои трeнировки, mои побeды, mои mысли. Вeдь я знаю, что ваm интeрeсна только одна звeзда — я. 🙃авигация: — посты о трeнировках. — mои личныe разmышлeния. — ваши вопросы — mои отвeты (eс…
Signed rest Ი𐑼 ׅ 𝐫𐇽ۣ⃜᪾𝐞𑪓𑩑ׂ࣮𝐢⃪ۣׅ⃛ ׄ ᗣ
Posted without readable text
🐳2🙏2😇1
Signed 𓏻 𝘮𖥔𝘴𝘴𝒶𓈒 ִ۫
Помогите пожалуйста. Я не знаю с какой сетки мне начать их слишком много. 01. Сталкер бллк: сетка по тематике сталкера 02. Энджел лок: сетка где есть что-то типа академии ангелов хранителей. Есть подопечные. Еще там есть фишка что каждый видит визуально рай по разному, но планировка у всех одинаковая. 03. Фурри лок: сюжет не оч там понятный но короче там типа люди фурри стали антропоморфными. И вроде агро (я рял п…
👍5😇3
Signed 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝖪𝖺𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 #Ланичкафанномеродин
Подслушка слово привет Я думаю над сеткой бллк x мга.Типо,ну а что звучит хайпово Что я думаю: 1.ОБА фандома будут в одной сетке.Т.е. : можно будет взять персонажа и из бллк,и из мга.У бллковцев появятся причуды(ну,тут уже саппы пусть думают ок) 2.Школьное ау,ибо лол,это ж мга.Допустим,Исаги и другие игроки - ученики,тренеры - учителя/герои(которые ДОЛЖНЫ как-либо быть связанными с школой.Наставник или ещё кто).Эго -…
🐳3😇2
Signed 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝖪𝖺𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 #Ланичкафанномеродин
кто-то планирует создать сетку со скул ау? мне нечего читать и комментировать, где же мне писать свои упоротые тексты с философией под пост, где кто-то получил двойку по физике. неанон лави. : ➛ #ТЕЙК | @gossip_bllknetsandblogs | @podslyshkateyki3_bot - ,, `
🙏2🐳1
Signed hanzada perishte.
О нихуя подслушка бллка Короче,очорт.Мой опыт в сетках не велик,эт третья сетка где я вообще существую(в первых двух меня отпинали и выгнали нахуй),поэтому я нууу,не особо понимаю как отыгрывать персонажей,буду прямолинеен.И поэтому хочу спросить в подслушки потому что НУ МАЛО ЛИ ТУТ ЕСТЬ ТИПЫ У КОТОРЫХ ХОРОШО ОТЫГРЫВВЮТ ШАРЛЯ ИЛИ ПРОСТО ЗНАТОКИ Короче,оцените мой блог бл*н : @GL_Charlesss : ➛ #ТЕЙК | @gossip_bllk…
🙏4
Signed 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝖪𝖺𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 #Ланичкафанномеродин
если бы у вас была возможность оживить сетку, то какую вы бы выбрали? лично я бы выбрала яндере лок. неанон лави. : ➛ #ТЕЙК | @gossip_bllknetsandblogs | @podslyshkateyki3_bot - ,, `
🙏2
Signed DNI. 𓏻 𝘮𖥔𝘴𝘴𝒶𓈒 ִ۫
𝙄𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙑𝙀 𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙐𝙇𝙏𝙎!!(≡^∇^≡) прошу не обижаться, это лишь мое ощущение, надеюсь вам понравится, жду отзывов и оценок!!🙌🏽
custom 54338563650617460586🐳4🙏3
Signed hanzada perishte.
𝙄𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙑𝙀. . актив на канале нужно как-то поднимать, по этому я предлагаю вам сюрприз интерактив!!(๑´ㅂ`๑) для участия, вам нужно написать в комментарии свой порядковый номер, персонажа из бллк и свой псевдоним!! главное, чтобы персонажи не повторялись.🐝 после того, как я скажу "стоп" в комментариях – набор на интерактив закончится!! с любовью соута. занятые персонажи: рео✅. кайзер✅. чигири✅. отоя✅. несс✅. курона✅.…
custom 52628941266925868034😇2👍1custom 54338563650617460581
Signed hanzada perishte.
соц. опрос!! какие термины при вступлении в км вам были непонятны/непонятны до сих пор?? работаем с терминологией и приняли решение спросить у вас, а то вдруг упустим чтото!! : ➛ #ТЕЙК | @gossip_bllknetsandblogs | @podslyshkateyki3_bot - ,, `
🙏2custom 52628941266925868032
Signed 𓏻 𝘮𖥔𝘴𝘴𝒶𓈒 ִ۫
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gossip_bllknetsandblogs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gossip_bllknetsandblogs named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GOSSIP: BLLK NETS AND BLOGS” (@gossip_bllknetsandblogs), 246 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gossip_bllknetsandblogs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.