Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

подслушано STH

@gossipSTH

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

246subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002514538762
TypeChannel
Username@gossipSTH
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gossipSTH

Growth

245246245.510 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 245 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:45 — 245 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 11:53 — 246 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:3110 Aug 2026, 11:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 245–246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:53246+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:45245no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:31245first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.0%
avg views ÷ 246 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (28 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,614
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53843858794794280984033.1%
custom 53821254682563127733730.6%
custom 53819314817634217142117.4%
custom 5771366710636452779129.92%
custom 538417929155248915064.96%
custom 533706917396718463254.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Мне интересно узнать, а какие личности в соник фд вас раздражают? Будь то худы в твиттере, либо просто сами по себе люди. Наверное самые неприятные лично для меня — Гентроид, Тей и Дорр. Первый владелец Тейлэми и остальных кф. Тей владелец Шедейлз. А Дорр просто для меня не очень приятна. Будет интересно услышать ваше мнение GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53819314817634217144

Signed miss u

9 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Почему никто не поднимал тему насчёт не очень адекватных фанатов Сильвера? (Я не про всех сейчас) Имею ввиду тех кто ноет о том что их любимый персонаж не популярен и вся популярность остаётся только Шэдоу и Сонику. Открою им секрет, Сильвер популяр на ровные с этими двоими, такое ощущение что они строят из себя особенных и не таких как все. Есть действительно почти забытые персонажи, например: Марин, Хани, Тикал

custom 57713667106364527793

Signed miss u

9 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Арчи Шедоу испортил впечатление о игровом персонаже Я понимаю почему его любят, но называть его "развитием игрового Шедоу" просто неправильно. Они два разных персонажа и игровой Шедоу всегда будет волком одиночкой, который делает вещи по своему и который не захочет открываться (это его осознанный выбор, а Тим Дарк у него деловые отношения) GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53821254682563127734

Signed miss u

7 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC87 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : После этого на меня скорее всего польётся тонна хейта, но всё же. Меня уже очень давно начал разочаровывать блогер Генри. Началось всё с его продолжительного общения с ШП, который очень странная персона, мягко говоря. Сказал бы жёстче, но тогда, скорее всего, тейк не пропустят. После продолжительного общения Генри с ШП его отношение к контенту изменилось. Шортсы генри буквально можно поделить на "до" и "после". Д

custom 57713667106364527794custom 53843858794794280981

Signed 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅

7 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔔 : Люди не очень понимают тонкости взаимоотношений Марии и Шедоу. Они не любовники, они не сиблинги, они не матерь с сыном и не друзья. У них абстрактная связь которую нельзя отвести в четкую категорию и которую, от ситуации, можно по разному трактовать. Первый скрин это слова Маекавы, создатель персов, а второй это официальный супервайзер персонажей. GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53821254682563127733custom 53819314817634217141

Signed 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅

6 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : я удивляюсь с того,как в фанбазе соника досихпор есть куча гомофобных персон у которых крышу сносит от любого не гетеро пейра,хотя у нас есть несколько сэми-канон лгбт пар,одна небинарная персона,голд,которая би с уклоном на женщин,тема сильвера,которая буквально посвящена геям,и эти факты они банально игнорируют,касаясь именно фанона(уточнение:имею ввиду я именно людей,которые яростно хейтят любой млм/влв под лю

custom 53843858794794280987custom 53819314817634217142

Signed tmxx

6 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC109 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Этот фандом взорвется если сонэми сделают каноном в 4-м фильме и Сега решит сделать синергию с фильмами и будут пропихивать их как пару в играх GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53819314817634217147custom 53843858794794280981

Signed tmxx

6 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Виспы очень сильно перехейчены как персонажи (реализация в геймплее другой разговор) Они очень классно дополняют мир и хорошо сочетаются с другими персонажами. Мб люди не любят их т.к. они отображают "детскую" сторону франшизы, но серия Соника никогда не была сугубо серьезной +В колорсах, особенно на ДС, действительно крайне милый сюжет где Соник помогает матери виспов справиться с негативными эмоциями и вернут

custom 53843858794794280986

Signed tmxx

4 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC162 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Меня очень раздражает насколько сильно зажрались фанаты популярных пейрингов. Я не буду писать сотый тейк про неких Сонедоу, поговорим про тех кого практически не обсуждают — Сильвейз. Про них практически не говорят, хотя по какой-то части их фанбаза не отличается от тех же неадетных фанатов сонедоу/сонэми и тд. Меня больше волнует, почему все почти единогласно решили что они канон? Нигде не было сказано, ни про

custom 53821254682563127736custom 53843858794794280981

Signed Мiнджинøвна

4 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC139 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Этому фандому крайне не хватает фанатов именно Соник Тим Не просто персонажей, сюжетов, музыки или игр, а именно фанатов коллектива и людей, которые стоят за этими играми GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53821254682563127733

Signed tmxx

2 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC176 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Я устал как американцы постоянно хотят навешать на Соника какую то "персонажную арку" превращая любимого персонажа в черти что и на отрез отказываются принимать его статичность и что Соник не является главным героем истории GSTH | анонимное сообщение 🙈

custom 53843858794794280989

Signed 𝓾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝓾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾

2 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC168 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔔 : Я в ахуе как фанаты Соника не могут принять абстрактность мира Соника с его условностями и что в каждой игре мир работает по своим правилами Все должно иметь объяснение , место в таймлайне, везде должны быть Ган, везде должны быть отсылки, нужно постоянно отвечать на вопросы Я серьезно вижу постоянно людей с вопросами "А как люди позволили Эггману построить парк в колорсах?" Чувак это УСЛОВНОСТЬ, вся франшиза в

custom 53843858794794280988

Signed 𝓾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝓾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gossipSTH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,176,394 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“подслушано STH” (@gossipSTH), 246 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gossipSTH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.