Channel
@gospodinrofler
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003991109291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gospodinrofler |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gospodinrofler |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 40 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 40 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 414 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 40.7% | |
| 🍓 | 19 | 16.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 13.6% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gospodinrofler. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Йоо Этот арт лежит у меня ещё с 14 июля, и ещё арта два наверно у меня осталось. поэтому считаю что уже время хотя бы один и показатьь Ещё хочу сообщить что я приболела, не знаю для чего, просто знайте. Ссылку на щп кину позже если не возражаете.. спасибо всем тем кто голосовал!!1!1 Мне очень приятно
🍓9💘2
хотите щп
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍓2
«28 июля 4:11. Юкки сказал что любит меня. От счастья я не могла прицелиться. Это мои чувства!» эхх, крутой момент. Да и анимешка тоже имбовая!! Поэтому вот в честь этого скетч прекрасной Юно :D
❤3
Редрав арта по мд, к слову ровно год назад!! Зммазала потому что мне слишком стыдно и я ненавижу эту штукууу.. Но я сама вижу что прогресс присутствует Репрсты по желанию скоро сотка должна быть
🍓1
Йо охае На днях решила сделать анимацию, сразу говорю я не профессионал. недоделанных проектов у меня куча..Но походу есть исключение Буду рада если оцените :D
❤🔥5🍓2
соряна за многа щп, может создам отдельный тгк чтобы туда писать чета почаще
👍2🍓1
Это просто великолепно! Все говорили что Аргентина выиграет, неееет! Испания!!! Я глянула только начало, ну больше половины первого тайма, было 0-0. а щя пересматриваю записи, как же красиво они забили всегда говорила что Испания с Францией выиграет так и случилось. можно было даже ставки сделать аххав
👍3🍓1
скетч Мбаппешки потому что надо Франция затащила финал за бронзу со счетом 3:1 Я прям рада, болела за них с самого начала и до финального свистка Теперь нужно чтобы и Испания выиграла, прошу Ямаль не дай выиграть Аргентине Сорян я немощь не умею людей рисовать
💘7❤2
Йо охае Тот самый топовый арт сегодня здесь! Это Мизи из зомби стейджа. Первый раунд визуально мне очень понравился, да и в целом меня вдохновляют проекты авторов которые занимались не только этим проектом. А вот по поводу муз сопровождения, мне прям не хватает более динамичных моментов(( Арт мне прям нравится из за фона очень сильно, да и волосы крутые вышли как по мне Я буду очень рада репостам :D
🔥8❤1❤🔥1🎉1
йо охае щп с радостными новостями, ну может для кого то и нет. У меня есть целых два готовых очень крутых арта, один коллаба а вот другооойй… это наверно один из самых самых лучших моих артов. И у меня наконец получился самый топовый фон. сначала кину коллаб, на днях. Потом и Мега крутой артик🎉🎉 А ещё у меня будет просьба репостнуть крутой арт, я буду очень очень очень счастлива если кто то репостнет Ждите на фото с…
❤4
кста я уехала, если реквесты буду рисовать то есть шанс что он будет на бумажке в виде скетча, надеюсь ничо страшного
❤2
Йо охае Чуть ли не забываю про свой тгк Это единственное что то законченное и нормальное, там ещё арт с дайске есть но он мне в итоге не понравился Скоро может кину коллаб кое какой, тоже рисуется еще :p Как круто что Франция ваще без поражений идет на чм, Бразилию жалко, она там вчера ночью проиграла Швеции, аайайа. .. с Португалией там вроде ваще беда беда(( Вот хочу посты короткие писать, пишу минимум, а получаетс…
❤7💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gospodinrofler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
хотите щп
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,135,028 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиен’s galeryy” (@gospodinrofler), 40 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gospodinrofler.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.