3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 455–456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 02:39
455
-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:17
456
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:03
456
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 455 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
28.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 March 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
59
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
227 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
102
44.9%
🔥
92
40.5%
👏
12
5.29%
👍
11
4.85%
❤🔥
7
3.08%
👎
1
0.441%
😁
1
0.441%
🥰
1
0.441%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В чем сила?
Для любителя психологии слабостью является неумение отстаивать свои границы. Однако для буддиста изначальной ошибкой является само выстраивание этих границ.
И если прирождённый буддист (как миссия человека) окажется в светском обществе, то естественное для его природы нежелание свои границы выстраивать воспримется им же, как порок и слабость.
Он (и общество) наречет себя наивным, бесхарактерным, глупым …
Как же быть человеку, стратегии бессознательного которого я описал в предыдущем посте?
Для начала следует увидеть две стороны одной "медали", а затем соединить их и увидеть саму "медаль" целиком.
Итак, у человека есть определенные качества (в примере: решительность, дерзость), которые привязаны к эмоциональному состоянию злости и напряжения.
Только в этом состоянии человек легализует свое право на дерзость и решите…
Люди провоцируют вас на действия, а не на эмоции!
Как правило, бессознательное стремится к легализации проявления качеств личности засчет эмоционального фона.
Например, решительность и дерзость проявляется в состоянии эмоционального напряжения и злости. Без этих эмоций человек, запретивший себе решительность и дерзость, эти качества не проявит.
В жизни такой человек сталкивается со множеством внешних раздражителей…
Вопрос от подписчика:
"Александр, я старший ребенок в семье. После прослушивания Вашей аудиокниги у меня до сих пор абсолютный шок, так тонко и глубоко Вы описали меня. Да, покупаю ценность масштабом усталости... Но я искренне хочу спокойствия и принятия себя. Дайте, пожалуйста, совет. Если не сложно 🙏"
1. Благодарю за интересный вопрос.
2. Иногда (а в случае со старшим ребенком в семье - довольно часто) само жела…
Выводы предопределены
Жизнь, по классике жанра, должна нас чему-то учить. Многие говорят о жизненных уроках, подсказках Вселенной, судьбах, матрицах... Но знает ли жизнь и знает ли Вселенная о том, что они нас должны чему-то научить?
Вопрос опять риторический. Да и с чего вдруг мы решили, что этой жизни и этой Вселенной есть до нас хоть какое-то дело?
Если подумать глубже, то можно понять, что наше стремление к "ду…
Мужские философствования с приятелем
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Присутствует ненормативная лексика (мне стыдно, пррррростите)
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gorbunowofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gorbunow️️️️” (@gorbunowofficial), 455 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorbunowofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.