Channel
@good_fate_info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
235subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002556574059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @good_fate_info |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/good_fate_info |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 235 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 235 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5926888399842577955 | 20 | 37.7% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5260253426180188601 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5927116114713644570 | 5 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5926754066150461946 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| custom 5926804403167170052 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| custom 5262845615036980488 | 1 | 1.89% | |
| custom 5927278666340896721 | 1 | 1.89% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
、 ୨ᰍ 𝐍𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ᚐ ⟡ 𓂃 : 𝐓𝗁𝖾 𝐜𝐡𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝐚𝗋𝖾 𝐩𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝐨𝖿 𝐭𝗁𝖾 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐟𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝐭𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗒 . . 𑁯 𝐈𝗇𝖿𝗈 @Good_fate_info : @AurumVeil_INFO ໒ 𝐋𝗂𝖿𝖾 @Good_fate_life : @AurumVeil_life ᨦ 𝐖𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 @sjn_yeah : @cherrywixxv : 𝐖𝖾 𝐡𝗈𝗉𝖾 𝐟𝗈𝗋 𝐚 𝐬𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝐚𝗇𝖽 𝐥𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝐥𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ┄ Zz . ୨୧
ㅤ✦ #союз𝑮𝑭 🦈
custom 59267540661504619461
、 ୨ᰍ 𝐍𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ᚐ ⟡ 𓂃 : 𝐓𝗁𝖾 𝐜𝐡𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝐚𝗋𝖾 𝐩𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝐨𝖿 𝐭𝗁𝖾 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐟𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝐭𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗒 . . 𑁯 𝐈𝗇𝖿𝗈 @Good_fate_info : @harmonicchaos_info ໒ 𝐋𝗂𝖿𝖾 @Good_fate_life : @harmonicchaos_life ᨦ 𝐖𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 @sjn_yeah : @mizzi_up : 𝐖𝖾 𝐡𝗈𝗉𝖾 𝐟𝗈𝗋 𝐚 𝐬𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝐚𝗇𝖽 𝐥𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝐥𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ┄ Zz . ୨୧
custom 59268883998425779551
#союз𝑮𝑭 всем здравствуйте!🤗
🍓1
⎯⎯ ֺ︩︪ ⭔:𝙉𝙚ꪝ 𝙪ꪀꪱ𝙤𝙣.. #? 1.0@ ㅤ៹𝗟unꪋ𝗿 𝗗𝗶ꪜ𝗲𝗻⌕ ﹙#𝗟𝗗﹚ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ& ᅠꮺ°˖⌗𝑮𝑶𝑶𝑫 𝑭𝑨𝑻𝑬!⌗𖦹𝅼۫ ˖ 2.0@ ::𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 ⌕ ﹙#𝗟𝗗﹚— инфо: @sbciz ⌕ ﹙#﹚— инфо: @good_fate_info ㅤㅤㅤㅤ— лайф: @good_fate_life 3.0@ ::𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 ⌕ ﹙#𝗟𝗗﹚— @A_vam ꘩ ⌕ ﹙#﹚— @Junsupuk ꘩ 4.0@ ::𝘿𝙖𝙩𝙖 02|04|2026 #союз
🍓1
💕 #союз𝑮𝑭
🍓1
、 ୨ᰍ 𝐍𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ᚐ ⟡ 𓂃 : 𝐓𝗁𝖾 𝐜𝐡𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝐚𝗋𝖾 𝐩𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝐨𝖿 𝐭𝗁𝖾 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐟𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝐭𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗒 . . 𑁯 𝐈𝗇𝖿𝗈 @Good_fate_info : @paradiise_flood ໒ 𝐋𝗂𝖿𝖾 @Good_fate_life : @@paradiiselife ᨦ 𝐖𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 @sjn_yeah : @asswowm : 𝐖𝖾 𝐡𝗈𝗉𝖾 𝐟𝗈𝗋 𝐚 𝐬𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝐚𝗇𝖽 𝐥𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝐥𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ┄ Zz . ୨୧
custom 59268883998425779553custom 59271161147136445703🍓1custom 52602534261801886011
꒰ 🌟 ꒱ — так же, активно ищу союзы!! писать - @sjn_yeah , пжпжпж #рп𝑮𝑭 #важно𝑮𝑭
🍓1custom 59268883998425779551
꒰ 🌟 ꒱ — #союз𝑮𝑭
custom 59268883998425779552🍓1custom 59271161147136445701
、 ୨ᰍ 𝐍𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ᚐ ⟡ 𓂃 : 𝐓𝗁𝖾 𝐜𝐡𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝐚𝗋𝖾 𝐩𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝐨𝖿 𝐭𝗁𝖾 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐟𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝐭𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗒 . . 𑁯 𝐈𝗇𝖿𝗈 @Good_fate_info : @GottoDoru ໒ 𝐋𝗂𝖿𝖾 @Good_fate_life : @GDorulife ᨦ 𝐖𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 @sjn_yeah : @Chuvapchacha : 𝐖𝖾 𝐡𝗈𝗉𝖾 𝐟𝗈𝗋 𝐚 𝐬𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝐚𝗇𝖽 𝐥𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝐥𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ┄ Zz . ୨୧
custom 59268883998425779552🍓1
꒰ 🌟 ꒱ — #союз𝑮𝑭 !!
、 ୨ᰍ 𝐍𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ᚐ ⟡ 𓂃 : 𝐓𝗁𝖾 𝐜𝐡𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝐚𝗋𝖾 𝐩𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝐨𝖿 𝐭𝗁𝖾 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐟𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝐭𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗒 . . 𑁯 𝐈𝗇𝖿𝗈 @Good_fate_info : @mitsmiss ໒ 𝐋𝗂𝖿𝖾 @Good_fate_life : @mitsmissis ᨦ 𝐖𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 @sjn_yeah : @fenek408 : 𝐖𝖾 𝐡𝗈𝗉𝖾 𝐟𝗈𝗋 𝐚 𝐬𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝐚𝗇𝖽 𝐥𝗈𝗇𝗀-𝐥𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐮𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 ┄ Zz . ୨୧
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @good_fate_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 557,318 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@good_fate_info named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᅠꮺ°˖⌗𝑮𝑶𝑶𝑫 𝑭𝑨𝑻𝑬!⌗𖦹𝅼۫ ˖” (@good_fate_info), 235 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/good_fate_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.