Mid week we will start posting actively on live trades and on chain - at the moment just doing daily reflections and staying moisturized in my lane

Channel
Gooby's Degens
@goobydegens
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
571subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001885356939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goobydegens |
| Created | 7 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goobydegens |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 571 | -3 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 574 | -3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 577 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 579 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 580 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 581 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 583 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 586 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 587 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 7 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2023 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Day 4 - reflections/watchlist will be posted on telegram daily 100k to 1M Challenge 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 48780 $AT 49549 $ASTER 1359 $MetaDao 181818 $4 14794 USDT Portfolio Value: $20975 - $AT $58467 - $Aster $13141 - $META $23636 - $4 $14794 USDT [3.1% to goal] Notes: Took out uPNL / rPNL and just called it “goal” so it’s easier to look at Sold Clanker this morning at $102 because feel like the trade is late for me now…
❤1
Day 2 - reflections/watchlist will be posted on telegram daily 100k to 1M Challenge 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 99,009 ASTER Portfolio Value: 106,929 [0.6% to goal] uPNL [0.6% to goal] rPNL Issue: should have sized into $4 and $Aster instead of all in Aster at $1.01 upon CZs Pardon Will look to rebalance portfolio this week but went with $ASTER because I believe its starting to form a bottom and safer gains
👍2
Day 1 - Goal of the day: be responsible on entry points and exit points 100k to 1M Challenge 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 100,000 USDT Portfolio Value: 100,000 USDT [0% to goal] uPNL [0% to goal] rPNL https://x.com/goobygambles/status/1981064591598899337 It’s begun
❤2🔥2🏆1😭1
42 Entries - Winner was Mayh3m - please DM me on TG for your prize!
🔥1
https://x.com/goobygambles/status/1978176858668605496 - Small incentive to comment on the tweet - just to reward you for taking the time to let me know what you want to see
https://x.com/goobygambles - Will be posting daily portfolio updates on this channel specifically + late night journal thoughts, do giveaways on X to grow community and main channel on TG will be used for thesis big cap trades/posting plays. This channel will mainly serve as a self-documented journal of what went good and wrong on the day purely for self gain
❤5
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @goobydegens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gooby's Degens” (@goobydegens), 571 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goobydegens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.