Channel
@gong0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
241subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002797645730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @baili5555 @gong0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 17 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gong0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 241 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 241 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 242 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎍百利集团 世世代代都是干自营一手产品 商户关注 @bbb33 马队关注 @baili5555 以下产品收量 通道 111，成功率🐳🦭 有量就有价 京东直付 通道 666 限额100 200 300 双端支付宝 成功率🦈🦭 小芒商城 通道 777 单金额 50 支付宝成功率🐅🐟 纯原+肯德基麦当劳 通道 999 微信通道 收私服 VPN 打赏，成功率🦭🐟% 汇付宝 卡密 独家新卡+骏网卡招专业卡密四方代理，招天猫 淘宝 京东 售卡店铺 以下模式招 马队 店铺 承兑 🎍招 淘宝 京东 店铺 卡密日量1000W卡密等你来卖 🎍招 企业支付宝马队，BD加白独用行业池 。无实力勿来。 🎍 真正支付宝内部BD，一月加10-30本户，欢迎原生三方合作，我给你加白 🎍天猫京东店铺，卡密款需承…
收付通来固定码商！来实力码商！有实力我这边安排固定位置！一直在跑的已经提了路虎揽胜了！目前有空缺位置！来锁位！要能共进退的！ 本金50万起！
有号的来 找 @bbb55 原生 千万一个号
执照一年以上 经营范围二手数码销售（可去工商增加经营范围） 法人干净 新企业支付宝注册最好，带ICP备案
BL百利只做带门槛的产品-以上产品均长期不死，并可新增合作伙伴。后续还需大量企业支付宝原生马队，纯BD加白手机网站，当面付。小白别来，无资金，无实力勿来。
资金前期-直付通纯加白二级-企业
支付宝-小芒
京东-游戏店铺-商超店铺-数字店铺
❤1
日历首日,是新岁,是新生 奔赴新程,万事可期 愿所念之人安康喜乐 愿所想之事皆如所期 百利支付携全体员工祝各位新年快乐☄☄
BL 百利一手三方收量： 自营：京东直付 —————————————————— 收：/京东店铺 商超 游戏 (包店铺运营保售后，不要拿我们和那种只管跑量不懂店铺运营的三方来比， 店铺异常解封 目前游戏店铺0死店率） 京东游戏店铺 来实力马队【D1到账】 没钱不要来 配套：虚拟户.承兑.浏览等等等… 百利：@bbb55 @bbb99
Photo, posted without a caption
BL 百利一手三方收量： 自营：京东直付 —————————————————— 收：/京东店铺 商超 游戏 (包店铺运营保售后，不要拿我们和那种只管跑量不懂店铺运营的三方来比， 店铺异常解封 目前游戏店铺0死店率） 京东游戏店铺 来实力马队【D1到账】 没钱不要来 配套：虚拟户.承兑.浏览等等等… 百利：@bbb55 @bbb99 京东ck/京东商超ck/京东游戏ck 无限收 无限收
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gong0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 95,904 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“百利研究院-收一手合作伙伴” (@gong0), 241 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gong0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.