Channel
@golovolog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001709372271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @golovolog |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/golovolog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 107 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 107 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
210 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 40.5% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 14.8% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 5.71% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.38% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 2.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Описанные детско-родительские отношения — это норма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Доброго апреля, дорогие гости Головолога! Спасибо, что не отписываетесь в это морозное для паблика (и для многих из нас 🥶) время 🫶 Возобновить сезон разделения мыслей хочу таким внезапным опросом. Как вы считаете: хорошие, близкие, дружеские отношения между родителями и детьми — это скорее норма или счастливая редкая случайность? Пара пояснений: речь идёт о положении, когда: - родителям и взрослым детям интересно …
Давеча сильно болела чем-то вирусным, так что мысли собрать в кучу пока сложно, а вот очень годного контента насмотрелась и наслушалась, так что вот вам авторский дайджест интересного! 1. Лекция про то, как играет с нами эволюция, смешной половой отбор и сложные компромиссы между выживанием и потомством (РУ) 2. Непродолжительное эссе, показывающее, что мы живём во втором Средневековье (EN) 3. Очень милый гайд-экскур…
❤10🙏3👍1
https://vk.com/video113899391_456240713 Эфир про сны! Заходите
❤5👌2🔥2
"Ничто не важно" и его последствия 🌱 По моему опыту, зачастую из постулата о том, что "ничто не важно / не имеет значения / иллюзорно [и прочие аналоги]" многие выводят неизбежную бездеятельность, демотивированность. Как будто устойчивым силлогизмом стало "раз ничто не важно, а стремлюсь я обычно к важному — значит, когда ничто не важно, не к чему стремиться", однако я не вижу в этом никакой такой железобетонной логи…
❤10👍3
Начали эфир, присоединяйтесь 😊 https://vk.com/video149306222_456239630
🥰3
Готовьте кофиёчек и вопросы о наболевшем 🥑
❤8🔥6🎉3👍2🐳1
Недавно думала о том, как, на мой взгляд, выглядит идеальное старение. Так: сознание с годами всё расширяется и расширяется, от индивидуального эго расходясь вокруг, растворяясь в связях с другими людьми, живыми существами, а дальше и просто стихийными элементами, результируя в итоге в полную физическую диссипацию. 🫠 Ведь всё к тому и идёт же: тело растворится в стихиях, сознание растворится в инфо-астрале (или люб…
❤5👏4
Головолог pinned «Пост-визитка! Хотите навести порядок в голове и жизни? Теперь я могу направленно помочь с этим. Весной в дополнение к высшему педагогическому образованию и учёной степени, я добавила диплом канадского института фундаментального коучинга ICF, и ввела в…»
Пост-визитка! Хотите навести порядок в голове и жизни? Теперь я могу направленно помочь с этим. Весной в дополнение к высшему педагогическому образованию и учёной степени, я добавила диплом канадского института фундаментального коучинга ICF, и ввела в арсенал работы формат индивидуальных сессий. 💅Это не инфоцыганский "тик-ток коучинг" ⌛️Это не психотерапия про травмы и вдолгую 💡Это возможность выйти из ментального…
👍9❤5🔥4
#цитатадня ...но раз это вызывает панику и тревогу, значит именно это может привести к миру и покою.
🕊5💯2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6🤣4😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @golovolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Описанные детско-родительские отношения — это норма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 24 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Головолог” (@golovolog), 107 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golovolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.