3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 16:15
46
-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:36
47
no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:02
47
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 24 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
241 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💋
64
26.6%
❤
51
21.2%
💘
47
19.5%
🥰
19
7.88%
❤🔥
13
5.39%
🍓
11
4.56%
💊
11
4.56%
🙏
10
4.15%
🕊
5
2.07%
🤯
3
1.24%
🎉
2
0.83%
🔥
2
0.83%
⚡
1
0.415%
🌭
1
0.415%
🍾
1
0.415%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 11 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SALESALESALE 🌟
настали тяжёлые времена & я распродаю браслетики по оч приятным цифрам ( себестоймости. )
. из наличия — те, что на фото.
+ делаю на заказ по вашим идеям, но только из тех материалов что у меня сейчас есть ( в 99% случаев мне нужно было что то докопать к каждому заказу ) ... так что предложу расскажу помогу че то заменить 🌟
🌟 на все :: ⸺ 33%
🦢средняя цена 1 браслетика ≈ 350р без скидки 🦢
мои раб…
RESULT . !!!
✨ ’ такая красота получилась только путем общей работы.
я нежно держу в ручках этот заказ, он определенно один из моих самых любимых ;
• так что напоминаю, что чтобы сделать заказ не обязательно иметь четкое изображение того, что вы хотите. можно прийти ко мне только с фотками персонажей и мы все равно что-то придумаем ! не бойтесь мне писать, спрашивать, узнавать — я всегда отвечу максимально френ…
— крайний заказ ;
очень хочу поделиться тем, как недавно девочки заказали парные браслетики 🥺🥺 они сделали доску на пинтересте для персонажей + нарисовали референс + написали эстетику & общий вайб . 🌸
клянусь они сделали за меня половину работы, я до сих пор любуюсь всем что они сотворили❕
абсолютная любовь
а результат, который у нас получился ниже !!
« регулус блэк был рожден спустя несколько минут после рассвета, потому что всю его жизнь ему было суждено немного скучать по солнцу. »
— это мои самые любимые браслетики 😭👆🏻 я ЛЮБЛЮ эту бусинку в честь друг друга на обоих браслетах ( " regulus is heart of the lion " )
джегулусы нашли друг друга в нашей вселенной иначе я не знаю почему эти украшения существуют.
cr . stxrchasrs
#наличие
сейчас есть ВСЕ браслетики из наличия ( см. #наличие ), так что на всех них действует скидка 20% при заказе ДО 05.10 🫶🏻🫶🏻 @krweer❕соберу & отправлю заказ за 2 дня 🌹
коты, с 06.10 ( это воскресенье ) я уезжаю на две недели & делать / отправлять заказы не смогу.
так что если хотели что-то заказать до этого срока — сейчас самое время !! @krweer 🥺🌟
❌NAVIGATION :
маленькая памятка, чтобы вы не терялись на канале!!
🌟 #наличие — украшения, которое можно сейчас купить
🌟 #инфо — полезная & важная информация
🌟 #отзывы — ваши фидбэки 🫶🏻
по всем вопросам — @krweer
with love,
GOLDEN
создала для вас доску на пинтересте, которая будет регулярно пополняться !!
— это – место, откуда можно черпнуть вдохновение для украшений ( мое и ваше 🤞🏼 ) так что если давно присматривались, но не знаете какой дизайн выбрать, то можно подсмотреть в эту доску 💋💋 #инфо
— парные браслеты с джегулусами❕jamie & reggie .
цена ( за оба браслетика ) : 600р
цена за 1 браслетик : 350р
+ доставка 🫶🏻
для заказа : @krweer
❌#наличие ( 🤩 💋 👰♀️ )
❤13🥰8💋7💘5⚡1❤🔥1🌭1🍓1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @goldenstoreshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 11 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 922,643 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@goldenstoreshop named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@krweer named in 5 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GOLDEN” (@goldenstoreshop), 46 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldenstoreshop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
