Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐆𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐍 | 𝐂𝐄𝐃𝐑𝐈𝐂 ᵍᵒˡᵈᵉⁿᶜᵉᵈ

@goldenced

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002820400360
TypeChannel
Username@goldenced
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 7 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/goldenced

Growth

1813 Aug 2026, 10:32 — 18 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 18 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 10:3214 Aug 2026, 05:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:1818no change
13 Aug 2026, 10:3218first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4117.3%
custom 52945218707233342023012.7%
🏆2811.8%
custom 52919337577905073412410.1%
2410.1%
🍓239.70%
custom 5348309408323487431208.44%
custom 5348110319409449580156.33%
💋156.33%
🔥93.80%
62.53%
😘10.422%
🥰10.422%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2025, 19:42 UTC165 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026

девушка остановилась, оглянулась по сторонам и заметила седрика. она мягко улыбнулась и помахала ему рукой. немедля парень сошел со своей лестницы окончательно и перебежал на сторону откуда начиналась другая. запыхавшись, он догнал чанг. — чжоу.. — пуффендуец тяжело дышал, пока пытался произнести заветную фразу. — ты бы хотела пойти со мной на бал? когтевранка просияла, снова улыбнулась: — ты просишь пойти с тобой? —

76❤‍🔥5🏆4🍓2🔥2😘1

9 Oct 2025, 19:42 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

╰┈➤ 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐆 ˊˎ- #𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐲 * #𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐜 запись от 17.12.1994 «профессор стебель собрала нас в одном из кабинетов. все пуффендуйцы расселись по краям комнаты и стали наблюдать за происходящим. декан вышла в центр, слегка постукивая каблуками от сапог. за окном началась пурга, тысячи мелких снежинок кружили по воздуху, на окнах появились ледяные узоры, которые превращались в настоящие картинки. «вниман

5🏆3🔥3

9 Oct 2025, 19:42 UTC59 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. 𝐬𝐨𝐨𝐧, 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐳𝐡𝐨𝐮, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐫 — @CH1NGNETTA

🏆3💋32

29 Aug 2025, 18:21 UTC196 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

╰┈➤ 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐆 ˊˎ- #𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐲 * #𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐄 — 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐇 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 Oh, 𝐂𝐀𝐍'𝐓 you 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 belong to 𝐌𝐄? 𝐇𝐨𝐰 my poor 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐓 aches 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 every step 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 move 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄 And 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 vow 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊 Every 𝐒𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐄 you fake Every claim you 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 I'll 𝐁𝐄 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐘𝐎𝐔 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ #𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜

🏆7🍓6❤‍🔥5💋32🥰1

26 Aug 2025, 20:21 UTC150 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

проверка актива, ставим реакции

🏆87❤‍🔥7🍓4💋3

7 Aug 2025, 19:49 UTC241 views43 reactionsread 13 August 2026

счет ирландии рос на глазах. опытные охотники ловко забивали голы, пробивали пенальти и вот, взглянув на табло, можно было увидеть счёт 160:10. но тут в небе замелькал маленький золотой шарик. ловец болгарии тот час начал свою погоню за ним. трибуны болгарских болельщиков затихли в ожидании чуда. но тем не менее ирландия продолжала свои атаки на соперников. ещё один гол!! поразительно. миг и трибуны разразились всево

custom 529193375779050734110custom 534830940832348743110custom 52945218707233342029❤‍🔥4custom 53481103194094495804🍓2💋21

7 Aug 2025, 19:48 UTC122 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

обе семьи хорошо проводили время: болтали, смеялись, обсуждали новости и события. время ушло далеко вперёд и настал момент, ради которого собралось такое множество волшебников. барти крауч регулировал движение через лес. к нему со всех концов лагеря собирались группки магов. — седрик, не копошись, сейчас наша очередь будет, — амос диггори предвкушая весь тот вечер, что ждал его, не мог не нервничать. — па-а-ап, мы ве

custom 52945218707233342027❤‍🔥2🏆2custom 52919337577905073412🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goldenced. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2025, 18:45 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

— на сколько вы оцениваете этот дв? (если не сложно, то дайте в комментариях знать почему выбрали тот или иной вариант)

  1. 🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡79%
  2. 🧡🧡🧡🧡14%
  3. 🧡🧡🧡0%
  4. 🧡🧡0%
  5. 🧡7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 9 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,218,064 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐆𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐍 | 𝐂𝐄𝐃𝐑𝐈𝐂 ᵍᵒˡᵈᵉⁿᶜᵉᵈ” (@goldenced), 18 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goldenced.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.