Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

путь знаний.

@going_01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

214subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002655507442
TypeChannel
Username@going_01
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/going_01

Growth

2102142127 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 210 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:02 — 210 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:41 — 214 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:178 Aug 2026, 17:41
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:41214+4
8 Aug 2026, 11:02210no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:17210first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.56%
avg views ÷ 214 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total409
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026

Имам аш-Шафи'ий رَحِمَهُ الله сказал: «избегай людей, которые считают наглость – храбростью, а мягкосердечность – слабоволием. И избегай тех, кто считает, что болтовня – это мудрость, а молчание – невежество. Разве ты не видишь, львы молчаливы, но их страшатся, а собаки громко лают, но их отгоняют камнями»…

8 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @neeslomlen_23Voice message

👥: чем тебя зацепило чтение Мухаммада Накидана? 👤: просто послушай..

7 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

👥 : кто этот врач , что исцелил твое сердце? 👤 : врач? …

7 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

ты слушал музыку, а Он не сделал тебя глухим. ты посмотрел на запретное, а Он не сделал тебя слепым. ты произнес скверные слова, а Он не сделал тебя немым. неужели ты не поймешь, что после любой твоей ошибки с тобой всегда будет лишь твой Господь?

7 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

запрещается клясться родителями. Ибн 'Умар да будет доволен им Аллаه, однажды догнал 'Умара ибн аль-Хаттаба в караване, когда тот клялся своим отцом, и тогда посланник Аллаهа ﷺ крикнул ему: «Аллаه категорически запрещает клясться своими родителями, и если кто захотел клясться, пусть клянётся Аллаهом или молчит». رواه البخاري надеюсь это наставит людей, которые через слово тычут «клянусь мамой».

7 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ибн Таймия رحمه الله сказал: «Ничего не может привести к прощению всех грехов, кроме покаяния (таубы)» см.«Минхадж ас-Сунна», 6/211.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @going_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,101,000 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“путь знаний.” (@going_01), 214 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/going_01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.