Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for . @𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐚𝐡

Channel

. @𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐚𝐡

@gogogogogogggog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003015471187
TypeChannel
Username@gogogogogogggog
Created1 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gogogogogogggog

Growth

192019.510 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:1320+1
11 Aug 2026, 17:4619no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:1619first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3243.2%
💘2533.8%
💅810.8%
💋68.11%
❤‍🔥34.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinnbrawlstarsPhoto

🤩 🪽 🐉🐉🥹Да, я кинню Драко, и у меня с самого раннего детства сильно развита фантазия, поэтому многие люди, которым не свойственно утопать в своих грёзах, порой удивляются, как вообще все мои фантастические идеи умещаются в моей голове. 🤩🤩🥹🪽 @kinnbrawlstars🥹

2

20 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC115 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @tupaiusPhoto

⸝⸝ ТУПА Я — КЕНДРИК ГИЛБЕРТ ( #jumpcut )

17 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

𝑾𝒉𝒐 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒆??

  1. Fan..💮21%
  2. Friend .. 🐾14%
  3. BEST FRIEND ..🤩3%
  4. Bf || Gf ..🤩3%
  5. Hater(((..🤡21%
  6. Passer..🌟14%
  7. ОДНОКЛАССНИК Ч*РТ..??7%
  8. Acquaintance..🎐3%
  9. ❤️ - Осеменить45%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7💘1

16 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC135 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

:: Заявка тгк .. 🎐 В свой тгк я не впускаю личностей которые кажутся мне не комфортными для меня🤍

4💘2💅1💋1

1 Nov 2025, 11:36 UTC949 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

::🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍..🖕 @𝐂𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐞 𝐑𝐮𝐧 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐝𝐨𝐦, 𝐧𝐨-𝐥𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧, 𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞, 𝐅𝐩𝐞, Чемпионы, БФИ, ИНМТ, Привет Шарлота, Монстромания, Jumpcut, Andy and Leila's toffin

5💘4💅3💋1

31 Oct 2025, 20:20 UTC909 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

:SOCICAL 𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬..✨😍 | 📱 𝐓𝐠𝐤 | 📱 𝐭𝐢𝐤 𝐭𝐨𝐤 | 📱 𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 | 📱 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐓𝐮𝐛

4💘3💅1

31 Oct 2025, 19:44 UTC869 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🤩🌟🌟🌟. 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐬..🫦 ::Я являюсь меломаном, поэтому у меня нет определенного вкуса в музыке да и вообще во всем🙂.. 🤩𝐌𝐒𝐈, 𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐢, 𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚, 𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐛𝐳𝐲𝐳, 𝐓𝐕 𝐆𝐢𝐫𝐥, 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐚, 𝐋𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐆𝐚𝐠𝐚, 𝐀𝐲𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚 𝐄𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚, 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞, 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐧, 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐱𝐜𝐱, 𝐀𝐥𝐞𝐱 𝐆, 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐳𝐞𝐫, Пошлая Молли, Алексей Вишня, 𝟓𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐦𝐞𝐭, дайте танк(!), 𝐊𝐁𝐒, Электрофорез, нежное это, твое нежное безумие, Урал Гайсин, Фортуна 812, Житность, ЕМЪ

💘43💅1

31 Oct 2025, 19:31 UTC760 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟 friend..🌟 @Валидол @Сата @Ксюша @Макс @Нейфория @Юрка @Скиттлз @OWO @Фиш @ Чайный_пакетик @Ириска/Лера @Илюша92

💘8💋43❤‍🔥2

31 Oct 2025, 18:42 UTC734 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔤🔤🔤🅰️🔤 🥹MR.RATAYCHICK | 🌟 | 🏁 |🥹🥹 🐶🌟🌟🌟🌟 :: В зачастую занимаюсь рисованием и коллекционерством всякого борохла… а так мечтаю стать мультипликатором и собрать свою команду😏 🥹 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @ я самый 🥹 🤩🤩🤩🤩 охуенный ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎰[𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐥𝐬] 🎐[𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐬] 💸[𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬] 🎐[𝐟𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐬] [ Переходник ] 🎐🎐

4💘3💅2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @gogogogogogggog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

𝑾𝒉𝒐 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒆??

  1. Fan..💮21%
  2. Friend .. 🐾14%
  3. BEST FRIEND ..🤩3%
  4. Bf || Gf ..🤩3%
  5. Hater(((..🤡21%
  6. Passer..🌟14%
  7. ОДНОКЛАССНИК Ч*РТ..??7%
  8. Acquaintance..🎐3%
  9. ❤️ - Осеменить45%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“. @𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐚𝐡” (@gogogogogogggog), 20 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gogogogogogggog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.