Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🫧نادوگانگی با حبااب

Channel

🫧نادوگانگی با حبااب

@goftegobahobab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

377subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979964063
TypeChannel
Username@goftegobahobab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goftegobahobab

Growth

3753793775 September 2026 — 375 subscribers5 September 2026 — 375 subscribers7 September 2026 — 379 subscribers13 September 2026 — 377 subscribers5 September 202613 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 374–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 23:21377-2
7 Sept 2026, 04:59379+4
5 Sept 2026, 08:23375no change
5 Sept 2026, 07:47375first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 377 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total1,600
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6554.6%
❤‍🔥2218.5%
🤝86.72%
🔥75.88%
👏43.36%
💯43.36%
🕊32.52%
👌21.68%
🙏21.68%
10.84%
😐10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC82 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

نیاازی به درک و دیددن آگااهی یا حقیقت نیست که اگر نیاازی بود و لزومی دااشت این چشم بند شخص و جستجو بر دیدگاان قراار نمیگرفت این باازی آگااهی یا حقیقت است و در پایاان بازی این چشم بند شخص و جستجو می افتد و بدون هییچ تلااش و حرکتی آگااهی یا حقیقت از چشماان آگااهی یا حقیقت تشخیص داده می شود.. 🫧حبااب @goftegobahobab

❤‍🔥3🤝2

30 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC87 views7 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

تو نمیتواانی در کناار هیچ شخصی آراام گیرری تفااوتی نمیکند این شخص بظااهر در جسم تو و یا دیگری بااشد شخص نه عاامل بلکه خود نا آراامیست.. 🫧حبااب @goftegobahobab

7

30 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC89 views8 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

یکباار و اگر بتماامی آهنگ سکووت شنییده شود هر صداایی فاارغ از خوب و بد، خیر و شر، مثبت و منفی و یا توهین و تمجید مخل و بر هم زننده آن ضرب آهنگ میشود ماانند برکه ای آراام و زلاال که سنگی در آن می افتد و آن را موااج و گل آلود میکند گوش سپردن به سکووت پشت هر صدا هر صداایی را در خود غررق می کند.. 🫧حبااب @goftegobahobab

🔥43🙏1

27 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC136 views12 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

از جاایی به بعد دیددن و شنییدن به مرحله ای از هشیااری رسیده که دیگر نیااز به جستجوی پیاامهاای معنوی در محتواای کتابهاا و آموزه هاا نمیبااشد زیراا حقیقت معنوی زندگی چناان در هر ماده ای در این جهاان بظااهر مادی ناابترین اشاره ها و پیاامهای عششق و یگاانگی را بی وااسطه جااری میکنند که این نیااز و عطش روحاانی در جستجو کنار رفته و در رووح هر چیزی دیده و شنییده می شود.. 🫧حبااب @goftegobahobab

❤‍🔥10💯2

27 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC118 views6 reactionsread 5 September 2026

از کجا بفهمم من کی هستم؟ حبااب : من؛ به دو وضعیت از بودن اشااره دااره وضعیتی رویاایی و خواابگونه که پدیداره و عینیت یاافته که معمولا این وضعیت بعنواان هویت پذیرفته و بر این مبنا با جهاان پیراامون روبرو و اتقااقات و شرایط رو از این زاویه دید بررسی و پیگیری میکنیم وضعیت دیگر بستریه که رویاا و من رویاایی در اون بستر ظااهر میشه و اتفااق میفته که بندرت قابل تشخیصه من اول و ماجراهااش نمایشی و نماایش من دیگر پرده و فضاای

5🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC126 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026

یعنی زندگی را باید آنگونه که هست زندگی کرد بدون کم و کاست؟ حبااب : زندگی آن جوری که هست و در کماال و بدون کم و کااست داره زندگی میشه کننده شناساایی در حاال زندگی کردن نیست زندگی کاملا خود به خودی، خودجوش و رهاا در حال اتفااق افتادنه بخشی از این اتفااق افتادن اینه که کسی در حال زندگی کردن و انتخااب کردنه اما این هم سناریو زندگیه که توسط زندگی در حال اتفاق افتاادنه‌ یعنی زندگی داره از طریق ما خودش رو تجربه می کنه؟ ح

5🔥3🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC120 views7 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

نیمه جاانی مانده و روحی گریزاان از جهاان مرده بر خود را کجا بااشد بجز خلووت پنااه.. 🫧حبااب @goftegobahobab

51❤‍🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

اهمیت موجودیت من در اینجا و با تماام آنچه هستم به حدیست که زندگی آنرا در اینجا و بهمین صورت ضرورت داانسته ماانند موجودیت مورچه ای بر روی زمین و یا عقاابی بر فراز آسمان و یا موجودیت هر چیزی دیگر در این کهکشاان طمع و تماایل بر چیزی غیر از آنچه هست و آنچه هستم و آنچه در حال رخ دادن است تلااشی نافرجام بر اعمال کردن اراده خود بر اراده زندگیست و کسب اهمیتی بیش از آنچه که زندگی عطا نموده من در براابر این نیروی نااشناخته اما

3❤‍🔥3👏1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @goftegobahobab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💞اشعار مولانا،سعدی💞
@shere_molavi · 32,483
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🫧نادوگانگی با حبااب” (@goftegobahobab), 377 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goftegobahobab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.