Channel
@godoudou2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
323subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002713213726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @godoudou2 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/godoudou2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 323 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 320 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 320 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (26 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 411 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#客評 #雙北 本來說只要一節，在一節快結束時又多加一節！客人第一次2節獻給了昕羽，感謝捧場❤️ 🤩客人回饋： 【身材很好，皮膚超好摸】 【有幫洗澡，願意配合姿勢】 【聊太開心忍不住多加一節】 👋總體評價： 妹妹名字：昕羽 妹妹罩杯：E 妹妹身高：165左右 妹妹胖瘦：瘦 妹妹年齡：22~23 妹妹缺點：無 是否改善點：沒有玩到69可惜 約會趣事：妹妹給我分享她的XX,XXXX 對兜兜的評價：很專業又耐心的推薦 是否回約：有預算會想再點 此次評分：10分 ❤️服務過程： 身材是真的好 而且很漂亮，修長型，胸部有E，而且很瘦腿長，有做美甲，從頭到腳都很正，沒一絲贅肉，屁股有肉，手感極佳👍 很溫柔 很主動 基本我是躺着爽 反正我現在腦海就是想著很柔軟的奶奶 進到正題她真的很敏感，一進去馬上有感覺，反應很真實不做作。過程中會撒嬌、會夾人， 有那種女朋友的感覺,整個環節很舒服自然 穴穴也很漂亮，一綫鮑有除毛，一整個就是想幹進去的…
味全龍啦啦隊成員有兼職 地點在 #台中 #台中 #台中 正確資訊：166/45/D~E 23歲 價格30k 現特價26k 給出兩個名額 能接受再來預約 #無刺青煙味 感興趣來私訊我預約 這幾天都可以約
近期一批高檔空姐出沒，每個都是必約限量款！ 台灣虎航 163/45/D 21歲 立榮航空 165/46/E 24歲 立榮航空 167/45/C 25歲 華信航空 168/47/D 26歲 華信航空 166/48/E 26歲 長榮航空 172/55/G 28歲 長榮航空 168/50/E 25歲 中華航空 166/45/D 23歲 星宇航空 176/57/E 27歲 星宇航空 170/54/F 23歲 私訊我看照片 @godoudou 😀 提前預約 全台可接
❤1
#雙北必約 #20k 潮潮 160/43/C 19歲 ⭐兜兜のID：godoudou 🐾簽到福利 💗兜總頻道 ☺️北部專選 😓中部專選 😢南部專選 🔞旅館推薦 📑客評專區 🍓新手必看 😍高價專區 👍點這全部加入
❤1
#高雄 今日新面試： 【隱藏妹，VIP可看本人照】 台日混血網黃 166/46/E 23歲 波波 高潮臉淫叫聲如女優，神似某日本女星！ 顔射深喉口爆舌吻吞精都可！而且是免費喔~ 12000一小時 尺度大服務騷敢玩 女友感滿滿 服務控顔值控必約 想約請私訊 @Godoudou #7/11正式報班 #請提前預約
#台中 40k原價 32k特價 165/45/D 25歲 近兩年某知名歌手MV中的女主角 本人正到不行 真奶長腿氣質細腰 想瞭解 可私訊我 @Godoudou
#客評 報班都在台北報班，這次剛好去台中~馬上推薦給超級VIP，客人也絲毫不猶豫的直接開房聽我安排，果然，約到馬上比所有妹都讚，榮登第一名，物超所值，見到感嘆超漂亮🤪 ⭐總體評價：活潑長腿正妹 妹妹名字 ： 妹妹罩杯：E 妹妹身高：167 妹妹胖瘦：瘦 妹妹年齡：23 妹妹缺點：太棒了找不到缺點 是否改善點：否 約會趣事：過程中妹妹突然跟我說下面已經吃飽了，超級可愛的對話。 對兜兜的評價：兜兜超棒，這次派的妹妹深得我心，榮登第一 是否回約：是 此次評分：99 ⭐服務過程： 進門看到完全符合我喜好的顏值身材，主要腿真的太漂亮了，白色小可愛還有短褲時不時還會露出屁股蛋，直接抱上去親起來，一起去洗澡妹妹直接用身體幫我洗新體驗，洗好了到了床上一樣先抱跟親，妹妹就說要幫我吃，看她邊吃那個表情享受，我也跟妹妹說換我幫妳舔，妹妹乖乖躺下經過我一番功夫，她就說我想要你那個進來，戴上套進去時緊到不行，可能是我遇過有史以來最緊的，過程妹妹不斷說受…
#雙北必約 為什麽推她的原因？ 💗明星顔值 超正！ 拍照無死角，穿衣也很有品！是現實中很難遇到並且不敢搭訕的人 💗身材超頂 E奶無小腹細腰長腿 皮膚光滑超好摸 也是隨便拍都身材超好的，這是我渴望的完美身形！ 💗有一定知名度，有不少粉絲量，（平臺不能說，請勿認親） 💗都這麼完美了，服務差也不會怎樣吧？可是她服務超級棒，對每位客人一視同仁，感覺還會給特殊服務，和她做愛就像是做夢夢到和自己的愛豆做愛，難忘開心又性福！ 💗結果現在價格才20000，和你用二手價買到了新的奢侈品一樣的道理！ #提前預約 #高檔必約 #比女優還讚的身材 #可能很快就恢復原價
❤1
#台中必約 #30k #IG網美 欣柔 162/45/E 23歲 有人愛這種類型的嗎？ 要約妹直接私我推薦！ 兜兜📱：@godoudou 兜兜📱：tgdou2 ⭐兜兜のID：godoudou ⭐兜兜の大G邀請鏈接ID
❤1😍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @godoudou2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 859,904 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“兜兜專屬極品夯茶❤️” (@godoudou2), 323 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/godoudou2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.