Channel
@line6c68
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,082subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001771685644 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @line6c68 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/line6c68 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 1,082 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,080 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 1,083 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 1,086 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,088 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 1,088 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (30 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 370 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#客評 #雙北 本來說只要一節，在一節快結束時又多加一節！客人第一次2節獻給了昕羽，感謝捧場❤️ 🤩客人回饋： 【身材很好，皮膚超好摸】 【有幫洗澡，願意配合姿勢】 【聊太開心忍不住多加一節】 👋總體評價： 妹妹名字：昕羽 妹妹罩杯：E 妹妹身高：165左右 妹妹胖瘦：瘦 妹妹年齡：22~23 妹妹缺點：無 是否改善點：沒有玩到69可惜 約會趣事：妹妹給我分享她的XX,XXXX 對兜兜的評價：很專業又耐心的推薦 是否回約：有預算會想再點 此次評分：10分 ❤️服務過程： 身材是真的好 而且很漂亮，修長型，胸部有E，而且很瘦腿長，有做美甲，從頭到腳都很正，沒一絲贅肉，屁股有肉，手感極佳👍 很溫柔 很主動 基本我是躺着爽 反正我現在腦海就是想著很柔軟的奶奶 進到正題她真的很敏感，一進去馬上有感覺，反應很真實不做作。過程中會撒嬌、會夾人， 有那種女朋友的感覺,整個環節很舒服自然 穴穴也很漂亮，一綫鮑有除毛，一整個就是想幹進去的…
#台中 #客評 這一兩個月...暑假新妹真的很多~有不少學生是只兼職到開學前唷！這個月是最後一個月了！想約學生的，這個月價格最便宜最優惠最值得！要瞭解諮詢我 @ddou67 ⚡️近期新下海：桃桃 156/43/C 19歲 學生 🦋客人回饋： 【的確很學生 學生無誤】 【沒刺青煙味 配合度蠻高的】 【一開始超害羞的 護理系學生】 【總體而言 很不錯 滿意！】 【這我應該能回約】 👋總體評價：95 妹妹名字：桃桃 妹妹罩杯：大B小C 妹妹身高：155左右 妹妹胖瘦：勻稱 妹妹年齡：19 妹妹缺點：無 是否改善點：無 約會趣事：青澀學生妹，適合慢慢引導 對兜兜的評價：100 是否回約：有時間會再回約 此次評分： ❤️服務過程：因為太青澀，所以過程沒有啥特別的，無刺青，無煙味，青春無敵
#雙北 #客評 前兩天葛格約的萱萱，直接超越上一個隱藏優妹，加入回約名單，說目前最優下週還要老點！ 🌙客人回饋： 【到了 感覺可以 很嗲】 【這價格也太便宜！ 這超頂】 【給200分 目前遇過最優！】 【又色又M 會被榨乾】 【太厲害了 一直要我幹她】 【打她屁股 用力點】 【下下週我再點她】 👋總體評價：給19了吧，目前約過最優 妹妹名字：萱萱 妹妹罩杯：B 妹妹身材：感覺有運動的身材 屁股蠻翹的 妹妹胖瘦：瘦，平常有運動的身材，又不會太瘦 沒什麼贅肉 很剛好 妹妹年齡：19 妹妹缺點：硬要說的話，我覺得不用穿這麼成熟打扮，清新大學生樣子會更好 是否改善點：無 約會趣事：妹妹偏M，讓我第一次體驗 對兜兜的評價：10 是否回約：會 此次評分： ❤️服務過程： 剛進門穿著白色的短裙，穿著比實際年齡成熟，脫下口罩第一眼有著水汪汪大眼睛，帶著非常嬌羞像志琳姐姐聲音的妹妹，後來得知是XXXXXXXX非常符合型像，妹妹剛兼職ㄧ開始表現…
❤3
#客評 #高雄 精靈又獲好評+1，紅牌的魅力是，基本上所有客人都會覺得優 😈 ❤️總體評價：90 妹妹名字：精靈 不愧是紅牌 妹妹罩杯：D 妹妹身高：159 妹妹胖瘦：瘦 妹妹年齡：23 此次評分：90 對兜兜的評價：100 🦋是否回約：有機會可以 但我想嘗試更多妹妹 補上約會過程： 提早跟兜兜預約了傳說中高雄紅牌精靈 客評跟本照都不錯 想說有機會要試試 馬上衝上高雄 結果忘記是假日 差點沒有房間 好在朋友給力馬上幫忙喬了一間休息出來 在房間等了一下 妹妹敲門 真的很漂亮 很瘦但是胸部很大很好摸 聲音也很好聽溫柔 果然如兜兜說的 精靈真的很優 物超所值 長得很像哈尼克孜，頂級顏值 ✕ 黃金比例 嗷嗚 🥳逆天外型：臉蛋精緻甜美 極致好看標準「三七比例」名模級好身材，一見鍾情就是這種感覺， 🥳戀愛感天花板：服務超級貼心，內建超主動屬性 懂我的一切需要，總之很優，雖然只配合兩次 但兩次都是超級滿意 ⭐️精靈 （超優麻豆身材外貌） …
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @line6c68. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 313,780 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“兜兜家所有客評 密我 @Godoudou” (@line6c68), 1,082 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/line6c68.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.