Channel
@go_shatirov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
179subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917857058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @go_shatirov |
| Description | Собери их все! Для связи: @goshatirov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/go_shatirov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 179 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 179 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 31.2% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 27.5% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 23.9% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @go_shatirov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 Время охотиться на сильных 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 Рынок сейчас перестраивается. Среди этого шума есть рабята, которых такие волны не накрывают — сильные специалисты, за которыми всегда очередь. Давно хотел сделать такую рубрику. Не вакансии, а скорее — рекомендации. Люди, с кем я лично знаком или получил надёжную обратную связь. Сегодня первая подборка. Каждый кандидат решал задачи уровня бизнеса, архи…
❤🔥4🔥2
Очередная статья в духе: “один чувак + $20k + AI = $1.8B стартап” И вроде бы хочется порадоваться за индустрию. Но давай честно: мы уже это видели. И не один раз. Каждые пару месяцев появляется новая версия этой истории. Меняется только герой. Суть — та же: “соло, дешево, быстро, почти без усилий — и вот тебе миллиард”. Инвесторы писаются кипитком, влажно пуская слюни. И у меня возник вопрос: у индустрии всё настол…
👍4💯2🔥1
Обменялись срезами рынка генИИ с коллегами по цеху на Global Tech Forum на прошедшей неделе. Ощущение, что рынок генИИ в России окончательно вышел из стадии «поигрались в пилоты» и уткнулся в реальность продакшена. Все спикеры говорят про интеграцию генИИ в процессы, но на практике всё ломается о три вещи: безопасность (облако нельзя, on-prem не взлетает), инфраструктуру (железо и энергопотребление внезапно становят…
ИИ человеку - клешня. (перефразированное "человек человеку - волк")
Вайбкодинг был ошибкой. Нанял разработчика. Все пошло в сто раз продуктивнее.
❤2🔥1😁1
KLING 3.0 для генерации видео вышел в свет Генерирует видео с нативным звуком до 15 секунд длиной. Расставляет камеры для динамики в видео, склеивает кадры, синхронизирует движения губ на 5 языках. Уже доступен в веб-версии на тарифе Ultra и на Higgsfield AI. Просто сравните прогресс видео генераций за всего 3 года. Космос! 2026 год будет весьма увлекательным для мувимэйкеров. Геймдевелоперам - приготовиться. 🍝…
🤯4❤3🔥3
Аудио-открытки от @lalkastickers_bot
Вайб-кодинг по вечерам иногда приводит к странным вещам. Сидим с коллегами перед нг,?болтаем. Кто-то вкидывает: — «Почему в телеграме до сих пор нельзя записать войс к стикеру?» Я такой: 🤔 🧠 ⌨️ Пара часов вечернего вайб-кодинга — и бот готов. @lalkastickers_bot Стек: cursor + kilocode + codex Так появилась «Лялка», которая делает простую, но почему-то до сих пор не существовавшую штуку: — берёшь стикер — записы…
❤4🔥1
Венчур мёртв Приключения — нет Днём все делают вид, что у них стратегия, пайплайны и «long-term vision» А вечером начинается настоящее: допилил идею, пересобрал продукт, сломал гипотезу, нашёл новую, закинул в нейросеть, залип, переписал, сохранил — и вроде снова жив. Так что «Венчур Эдвенчур» отправляется на покой. Теперь это «Вечерний Эдвенчур» — про вайб-кодинг, микро-продукты, странные идеи, честные провалы и…
🔥9👾2
Channel name was changed to «Вечерний Эдвенчур | Гоша Шатиров»
Channel photo updated
Один продукт в день Я для себя ввёл простое правило: один нейросетевой продукт в день. Не стартап. Не «великая идея». А что-то законченное, что можно показать, пощупать или использовать. Что считается продуктом: маленькое веб-приложение AI-анимация или изображение, доведённое до нужной формы и смысла презентация, текст или документ, который что-то объясняет или решает. Ключевое слово — завершённость. Чаще это пр…
🔥5👍3👾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @go_shatirov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 965,201 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вечерний Эдвенчур | Гоша Шатиров” (@go_shatirov), 179 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/go_shatirov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.