Channel
@gnezdoSanRona
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001965219782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gnezdoSanRona |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gnezdoSanRona |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 101 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 104 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 105 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 103 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 103 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260404531719594367 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5278331677968457596 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5303137772687626739 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5427239409596542645 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5774092580350332850 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5440854425860061667 | 1 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про 3 часть закулисья Ролик набрал 1400 просмотров, что вполне неплохо. Я и сам понимал, что видео получится уступающим по качеству предыдущим частям. Думаю, я пока что отойду от темы бекрумса, так как уже выжал из нее все возможное и начал ходить по кругу. Но у меня есть идеи для видео по похожим модам, никак с закулисьем не связанным. Если и вернусь к этой теме, то точно не скоро. Сейчас я работаю над новым ролик…
Signed SanRon⁴²
Спасибо Spirit за прекрасные арты
Signed SanRon⁴²
RESPEC😱😱😱🔥🔥🔥
Signed SanRon⁴²
НОВОЕ ВИДЕО!!! https://youtu.be/GrghK1wTsOc https://youtu.be/GrghK1wTsOc https://youtu.be/GrghK1wTsOc Буду рад репосту 🤗
Signed SanRon⁴²
Анонс продолжения роликов по закулисью. Осторожно, спойлеры!
custom 52783316779684575961
Signed SanRon⁴²
Аддон мода на 1.16.5
Signed SanRon⁴²
Разъяснительный пост по моду Faithful Backrooms Мод https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/faithfulbackrooms/files/all?page=1&pageSize=20&showAlphaFiles=hide В первых двух частях моего видео по закулисью я использовал версию мода для 1.16.5. Там совершенно другой бекрумс, разработанный иным автором. Сейчас вроде развитием мода занимается другой разраб, сосредоточенный только на 1.20.1, на которой и была запис…
Signed SanRon⁴²
Видео вышло!
Signed SanRon⁴²
Насчет видео по закулисью Ролик уже готов. Он получился короче предыдущих: 16 минут вместо 22. Не знаю, плюс это или минус. Возможно, меньше контента, зато видео вышло более динамичным. Честно говоря, мне самому результат не очень нравится. Кажется, что эта часть уступает прошлым, поэтому не стоит завышать ожидания. Пожалуйста поделитесь своим мнением после просмотра. Сейчас я дорабатываю ролик и занимаюсь превью. С…
custom 52783316779684575963
Signed SanRon⁴²
Так называемые спойлеры к 3 части видео по закулисью
custom 57740925803503328502custom 53031377726876267391
Signed SanRon⁴²
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed SanRon⁴²
Мое мнение насчет фильма по закулисью (без спойлеров) Это пиздец круто. Зная Кейна Пиксельса и его сериал по бекрумсу, я верил, что проект выйдет качественным. К счастью, ожидания полностью оправдались. Фильм получился именно таким, каким я и хотел его видеть. Если честно, вселенная Кейна нравится мне гораздо больше, чем версия закулисья с кучей уровней и множеством сущностей, но я считаю, что и другой канон вполне…
Signed SanRon⁴²
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gnezdoSanRona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гнездо SanRona” (@gnezdoSanRona), 101 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gnezdoSanRona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.