Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Blackhat BASE Multibuy

@gmgn_base

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

327subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002683328443
TypeChannel
Username@gmgn_base
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gmgn_base

Growth

3273333307 August 2026 — 333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 333 subscribers15 August 2026 — 327 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 326–334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:27327-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:15333no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:18333first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.06%
avg views ÷ 327 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 April 20262 August 2026)
Views total10
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026

🚨 BLACKHAT EMPIRE · MAIN NETWORK 🚨 Realtime signals · no batch spam · one clean ecosystem 📁 START HERE 🏴 Add all 7 MAIN groups Recommended when Telegram allows only one shared folder. 🏴 MAIN HUBS 💬 Community Chat ☀️ SOLANA Main 🟡 BSC Main 💎 ETHEREUM Main 🔵 BASE Main 🟢 ROBINHOOD Main 🛡 STABLE Main 📂 CHAIN CHANNEL FOLDERS 📁 SOLANA · 27 alert channels 📁 BSC · 15 alert channels 📁 ETHEREUM · 15 alert channels 📁 BASE ·

10 Jul 2026, 22:13 UTC48 viewsread 8 August 2026

4 wallets purchased #NOTTS 📊 MC: $37.6k ⏳ Age: 1m 💵 Volume: $2,334.06 🕔 1h #0x25f453aab92557ed0e723a1e39ca2d17c0fbeba3 📊 CHART | 🟢 GMGN BUY | 🎯 MAESTRO

10 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC48 viewsread 8 August 2026

6 wallets purchased #$AMIRI 📊 MC: $29.0k ⏳ Age: 41m 💵 Volume: $3,629.36 🕔 1h #0xac45abc8ffa668dee7edd324ff2610b0f0515254 📊 CHART | 🟢 GMGN BUY | 🎯 MAESTRO

10 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026

4 wallets purchased #RHAGENT 📊 MC: $26.8k ⏳ Age: 1m 💵 Volume: $2,151.68 🕔 1h #0xa5ac8feae8d19ac8e5872520477c67d07e9ffba3 📊 CHART | 🟢 GMGN BUY | 🎯 MAESTRO

10 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026

7 wallets purchased #CHAMP 📊 MC: $365.4k ⏳ Age: 794d 💵 Volume: $2,086.81 🕔 1h #0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341 📊 CHART | 🟢 GMGN BUY | 🎯 MAESTRO

9 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026

4 wallets purchased #DEXBULL 📊 MC: $20.7k ⏳ Age: 23m 💵 Volume: $2,451.99 🕔 15m Token: 0x811a70d3ecb139a7cdc05907f3fc1588419e2bb3 ⚠️ Scan: MC $19.3K / Liq $34.8K | Holders 1 | Top10 100% Risk: contract NOT verified on-chain (no source code visibility) CA: 0x811a70d3ecb139a7cdc05907f3fc1588419e2bb3 CHART | GMGN | MAESTRO

9 Jul 2026, 02:31 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026

8 wallets purchased #B420 📊 MC: $24.1k ⏳ Age: 3h 💵 Volume: $2,069.12 🕔 15m Token: 0xb200000000000000000000231d6c1f1ce455ba32 ⚠️ Scan: MC $6.2K / Liq $11.3K | Holders 59 | Top10 82% | Bot 0.9% Risk: contract NOT verified on-chain (no source code visibility) CA: 0xb200000000000000000000231d6c1f1ce455ba32 CHART | GMGN | MAESTRO

9 Jul 2026, 00:35 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026

7 wallets purchased #0XB20 📊 MC: $23.1k 💵 Volume: $2,076.42 🕔 15m Token: 0xb2000000000000000000007626fb12ff1816e201 ⚠️ Scan: MC $20.7K / Liq $16.4K | Holders 98 | Top10 60% | Bot 44% / Fresh 3.6% Risk: contract NOT verified on-chain (no source code visibility) CA: 0xb2000000000000000000007626fb12ff1816e201 CHART | GMGN | MAESTRO

26 Apr 2026, 20:49 UTC263 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#BASE - 3 wallets purchased #BV7X @ $0.0000021 | 📊 MC: $205.7k ⏳ Age: 84d 💵 Volume: $2,368.96 🔍 Wallets: swing_trader_176, BHBASEQ6025, BHBASEQ4685 🕔 1h ✅Token CA:0xd88fd4a11255e51f64f78b4a7d74456325c2d8dc 👇👇CHART👇👇 https://gmgn.ai/base/token/10Xboost_0xd88fd4a11255e51f64f78b4a7d74456325c2d8dc

26 Apr 2026, 20:38 UTC255 viewsread 8 August 2026

#BASE - 2 wallets purchased #CONTO @ $0.00000024 | 📊 MC: $23.6k ⏳ Age: 6m 💵 Volume: $1,658.39 🕔 15m ✅Token CA:0x78b06994846d33ca5b6f6a378e5eafd52cb1aba3 👇👇CHART👇👇 https://gmgn.ai/base/token/10Xboost_0x78b06994846d33ca5b6f6a378e5eafd52cb1aba3

26 Apr 2026, 20:05 UTC223 viewsread 8 August 2026

#BASE - 2 wallets purchased #Satoshi @ $0.0000029 | 📊 MC: $2.8k ⏳ Age: 0m 💵 Volume: $200.48 🕔 15m ✅Token CA:0x3e9c57ba16bfba70b92ef72ad6d5e4d826f1d3c5 👇👇CHART👇👇 https://gmgn.ai/base/token/10Xboost_0x3e9c57ba16bfba70b92ef72ad6d5e4d826f1d3c5

26 Apr 2026, 19:43 UTC172 viewsread 8 August 2026

#BASE - 2 wallets purchased #SOLVR @ $0.00000046 | 📊 MC: $46.0k ⏳ Age: 87d 💵 Volume: $2,011.10 🕔 15m ✅Token CA:0x6dfb7bfa06e7c2b6c20c22c0afb44852c201eb07 👇👇CHART👇👇 https://gmgn.ai/base/token/10Xboost_0x6dfb7bfa06e7c2b6c20c22c0afb44852c201eb07

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gmgn_base. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blackhat BASE Multibuy” (@gmgn_base), 327 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gmgn_base.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.