Наконец-то проект стал публичным, можно показывать! Из забавного: команда бренда так полюбила малый юс, что даже признала прочтение «Кевроля», чтобы эта буква стала частью логотипа.
❤27

Channel
@glyphomania
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
525subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001680743832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glyphomania |
| Description | Проектирую шрифты, увлекаюсь их историей, пробую себя в прочем дизайне. Связь: @DaniloBorovinic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glyphomania |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 525 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 525 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
570 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 368 | 64.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 75 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 65 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 3.33% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 2.81% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 1.58% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 1.58% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.877% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.175% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.175% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.175% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 570reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glyphomania. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 28 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наконец-то проект стал публичным, можно показывать! Из забавного: команда бренда так полюбила малый юс, что даже признала прочтение «Кевроля», чтобы эта буква стала частью логотипа.
❤27
Пишу это, готовясь выпустить пару неогротесков без единой нотки гуманистичности, конечно же. 😎
❤22👍2
На конец нулевых и начало десятых пришлось моё раннее детство, но так вышло, что через зумерский взгляд в прошлое я постепенно стал проникаться дизайном того времени. Наибольшее внимание я, конечно, обращаю на шрифты: и по причине личного интереса, и потому, что шрифты в дизайне служат одним из важнейших маркеров времени. Захотелось дать себе краткий ответ на вопрос: «Чем шрифты тогда отличались от шрифтов сейчас?» …
❤25🔥4
В этом семестре мы занимались редизайном любого существующего школьного учебника, поэтому наконец выпал шанс попробовать себя еще раз в книжном деле. Я решил взять в качестве темы татарский язык. Такой у меня получился проект.
❤50❤🔥19👍9🔥3💘1
У нашей команды только что вышел первый шрифт!
❤33🔥12🥰9👎1
На днях в культурной столице Черногории, Цетине (кстати, очень важном городе для истории южнославянского книжного дела), прошёл фестиваль FLUID, который в этом году сделал особый акцент на типографике и дизайне шрифта. Впечатления просто отличные: познакомился с новыми людьми, послушал лекции дизайнеров из разных стран, а ещё поучаствовал в воркшопе Хрвое Живчича — хорватского дизайнера, выпускника Type&Media. Мы ра…
❤21🔥10❤🔥6🤯1
Если сегодня утром вы проснулись с мыслью, что этому миру не хватает ещё одного шрифтового коллектива, то мы с друзьями готовы вас порадовать, потому что именно его мы и решили основать! Collective Typeworks 🚧ведутся буквенные работы🚧
❤27👍8😎5😁2👏1🔥1
Ещё хотел поделиться крайне сырой динамической антиквой, но её лучше не ждать, потому что я сам не знаю сколько на нее ещё уйдет времени...
❤31❤🔥8😍5🔥1
Пиксельные шрифты — это одновременно и простой, и сложный жанр. С одной стороны, тебе не надо заниматься выглаживанием идеальных кривых, контуры вообще очень простые и состоят из точек, выстроенных по четкой сетке. С другой стороны, ты лишаешься многих привычных инструментов шрифтового дизайнера, потому что в рамках ограниченной сетки нет никакой возможности реализовать большую часть оптических компенсаций. То есть п…
❤31❤🔥9
Украл у дворника лопату.
❤56❤🔥21😁14😎4
Работа над новыми версиями букв «Ћ» и «Ђ» для грядущего обновления семейства NWT Bodoni Елены Новосёловой. Несмотря на то что вариант второй буквы с выносным элементом стремительно набирает популярность, я решил, что вариант с поджатым хвостом всё-таки стоит оставить в качестве альтернативы. Именно такую форму, кстати, отстаивал великий реформатор сербского письма Вук Караджич в споре с епископом Лукианом.
❤36❤🔥12
Ещё в осенью 2024 я начал делать шрифт, который поддерживает все варианты коми орфографий, включая древнепермское письмо (aka анбур). Правда, через некоторое время всё заглохло. Но так вышло, что недавно я решил заново запостить его в другую социальную сеть (название вылетело из головы), благодаря чему мы скооперировались с Антониной Самохиной и начали полный реворк проекта. • Строчный набор всё-таки решено было до…
🔥34❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @glyphomania. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,088,667 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глифомания” (@glyphomania), 525 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glyphomania.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.