Channel
@gls_krea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003429866540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gls_krea |
| Description | Место, где креаторы получают силу быть собой Чат: @gls_krea_4at Организаторы: @by_bukin Манифест и ответы на вопросы в закрепе |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 22 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gls_krea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 111 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 111 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
16 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итог нашего общего алфавита! Я старался выбирать не самые лучшие работы, а смелые и разнообразные. Да, вместе, стоя рядом, они выглядят немного путано, и может показаться, что такой алфавит ничего не объединяет. Но некоторым ведь и в «Чёрном квадрате» Малевича смысла не видно, так что вы сами знаете, что нужно делать, когда кажется 😎 От себя хочу сказать, что для меня этот челлендж стал своеобразным путём, на котор…
❤4
Сегодня в челлендже, где в основном был визуал, - неожиданно стих. Буква «Э» - эго https://t.me/bukin_crea/381
Казимир Малевич объяснял «Чёрный квадрат» чаще, чем хотел. Так происходит либо с гениальной идеей, либо с оооочень тупой. Обычная "защита" проходит быстро, но и не запоминается
❤1
Дэвид Линч объясняет фильмы так, что становится ещё непонятнее. Это уже даже начали считать его фишкой. А нужно ли вообще объяснять творчество и искусство?
😁1
Хаяо Миядзаки уходил на пенсию столько раз, что это стало стилем. Первый раз был ещё 1990 году Дед работает, а ты устал?! Пф...
💯1🔥1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
Я - Я Самая сложная тема, особенно для меня. Где заканчиваются ожидания других и начинается твоё «я» - там и начинается настоящее авторство. Авторство не только в работах, но и в жизни Если рискнёшь создать "Я" - приноси в чат
Photo, posted without a caption
Часто ли вы задаёте себе вопрос: зачем? Зачем вы в профессии? Что вас вдохновляет по-настоящему не формально. Не мысль о том, что после всех правок вы уедете в отпуск) Не покупка нового рабочего стола и прочих мелочей. Почему вы до сих пор здесь? Зачем вы в профессии?
Поль Сезанн всю жизнь думал, что рисует «слишком плохо», и поэтому продолжал. И ты давай иди работать!
👍2❤1
Юла крутиться - лавэха мутиться Остановилась - завалилась Иногда нужно просто продолжать движение, даже без роста, без изменений, без аплодисментов Главное уметь кайфовать даже от монотонного процесса А свой процесс можешь закидывать в чат
👍1
Представляете, есть люди, которые не любят то, чем занимаются! Всегда это поражало. Они сидят, страдают на работе, потом приходят домой и уже там, в лучшем случае, занимаются своим хобби. А кто-то просто залипает в бытовухе. Да, бывают заказчики-мудаки, бывают неидеальные проекты. Но в целом разве не круто заниматься тем, что любишь?
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gls_krea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,239,020 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голос креатора” (@gls_krea), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gls_krea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.