Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑮𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑴𝒀𝑾

Channel

𝑮𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑴𝒀𝑾

@gloomywoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003129453614
TypeChannel
Username@gloomywoi
Description|𝒜𝒾𝓁𝓊𝓃𝒶; 𝑅𝑜𝓍𝓈𝒶𝓃𝒶; 𝑀𝒾𝓀𝓊; 𝒱𝒾𝑜𝓁𝑒𝓉| 𝓉𝓉𝓀:: @𝑔𝓁𝑜𝑜𝓂𝓎𝓌𝑜𝒾𝟘
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 2 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gloomywoi

Growth

77 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:327no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:217first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54115681433802767092237.3%
custom 52987972744433117681016.9%
custom 5411264579386762333915.3%
custom 5411223347700719267813.6%
custom 5411252471873953898813.6%
custom 541149841029125987223.39%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Nov 2025, 05:22 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @smenter_oiPhoto

БЕРЕТ ЗВЕЗДЫ С АРТИСТОВ, А ПОТОМ ВЫГОНЯЕТ?! &ап Прочитать можно тут - тык Spoilers :: — Элзи, тот самый продюсер? — Звезды за репост к себе в тгк со 100 пдп? — Жалуются на продвижение? — Обманула на звезды? Её канал : @elzywrit Юз : @uliashnaya Все скрины в коммах! (пишите в комментариях свое мнение о ней!)❤️

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

6 Nov 2025, 04:30 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @smenter_oiPhoto

МАССОВЫЙ НАБОР ПОД КРЫЛО! анкеты здесь - @sm_infor писать в бота - @RQlol_bot НАВЫКИ ОТПРАВЛЯТЬ В ВИДЕО, СРАЗУ ПРИКРЕПЛЯЯ К АНКЕТЕ ВМЕСТЕ СО СКРИНОМ. ЕСЛИ ЖЕ У ВАС АУДИО - ПРИКРЕПЛЯЕМ СРАЗУ К АНКЕТЕ, А СКРИН ОТПРАВЛЯТЬ ПОДПИСАННЫМ, СРАЗУ ПОСЛЕ АНКЕТЫ 👆👆👆👆👆👆 соблюдать данные правила обязательно!

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

12 Oct 2025, 05:29 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

9 Oct 2025, 18:58 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSUr6b9ph/ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ this is new video of tiktok

custom 54115681433802767094custom 54112645793867623332custom 52987972744433117681custom 54112233477007192671

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

7 Oct 2025, 18:46 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54115681433802767093

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

6 Oct 2025, 17:50 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSUNFrHcq/ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ this is new video of tiktok

custom 54115681433802767095custom 54112524718739538981custom 54112645793867623331

Signed ᴍᴏɴᴀsʜᴋᴀ

5 Oct 2025, 15:15 UTC82 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЛИСТ МЬЮ:: •@V1MRR [@ss1cl] •@choidaniel1yeon [@ORGAANGRL] •@N1KNER [@Y0URStpwd] •@porcelainaisD [@porcelainais] •@aliyka0 [@C9S4NS] •@LIONE3S [@qwx69v] •@facindypa [@mulliir] •@BratzDill [@ddierew] •@eSSkander [@ESKAND33R] •@f_l_a_me [@g_h_s_t] •@tired_by_you [@Dishu_awwq] •@xsyilk [@linmrxx]

custom 54115681433802767094custom 52987972744433117682custom 54112233477007192671

4 Oct 2025, 16:14 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

бинго от Мику! будем рады получить ваши ответы🦋

custom 54112233477007192674custom 52987972744433117682custom 54112524718739538981custom 54112645793867623331

4 Oct 2025, 12:21 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSUejvuMU/ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ♡ ◛⑅·˚ ༘ this is new video of tiktok

custom 52987972744433117683custom 54115681433802767092custom 54112233477007192671custom 54112645793867623331custom 54114984102912598721

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @gloomywoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑮𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑴𝒀𝑾” (@gloomywoi), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gloomywoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.