Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Global Intimacy Community: Women*/FLINTA only community

Channel

Global Intimacy Community: Women*/FLINTA only community

@global_intimacy_community

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003480080793
TypeChannel
Username@global_intimacy_community
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/global_intimacy_community

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

666766.57 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers31 August 2026 — 67 subscribers10 September 2026 — 66 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 34 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 22:1866-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:3767+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:0266no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:1466first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC217 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

What gets in the way of you asking for what you actually want: in intimacy, in your relationship, in bed?

  1. Fear of hurting them or causing a fight11%
  2. I tried asking in the past and it didn’t go well…33%
  3. I don’t have the words for it yet11%
  4. I might want too much67%
  5. Im not sure even what I want33%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC207 viewsread 10 August 2026

June intimacy question 🌊 This month, in my work with intimate partners, as part of my placement in psychosexual therapy something kept coming up across completely different relationships and different stories. Everyone wanted closeness and intimacy. Everyone wanted to be touched, or understood in a specific way. But somewhere between the wanting and the asking… something stopped them. So this month’s question is …

11 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC74 viewsread 10 August 2026

june relational's practice 🌿 This week I gave sessions to two couples: from two completely different countries, two completely different lives. Both of them said almost the same thing: Sometimes the distance between isn't created by a fight. It's created by a hundred small moments where you were both in the same room and yet feeling alone I offered them both the same practice. It's one of my favourite things to do …

5 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC65 viewsread 10 August 2026

June is here 🌿 (a few days late, as i was away in uk for my MSc in psychosex therapy) preview in the monthly calander Before we step into this month, I want to pause and say: thank you for showing up in May! your answers told a real, shared story. almost 40% of you said there's simply nothing left at the end of the day. Life, kids, work, and by the time you reach each other, the tank is empty. When you do try to r…

21 May 2026, 09:43 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026

may intimate community research question! Last week’s poll gave such interesting insights 👀 It seems many of us struggle n to know how to reconnect when differences arise. Thank you to everyone who voted in last week's poll! you gave me so much to think about. The results were clear: what you need most right now is a **guided somatic intimacy & reconnection practice** 🔥 something embodied, not just conceptual. …

14 May 2026, 16:01 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

mai intimacy question in our global intimacy community! Last week, we explored something beautiful (and very human) how different our automatic reactions can be when we get triggered in relationships. Different nrelational reflexes. Different survival strategies. And yet… so many of us recognized ourselves in each other 👀 Because usually, it’s never really about the dishes... Under conflict often live: different…

7 May 2026, 18:09 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026

**Thursday relational practice in our intimacy community ** This week, I bring a practice I needed, actually, when I found myself getting deeply triggered in a relational dynamic inside my own poly relationship. My nervous system went into protection mode: I withdrew and avoided both of my relationship people (flight), while also saying “everything is okay” to keep the peace (fawning). So this week’s relational i…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @global_intimacy_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

What gets in the way of you asking for what you actually want: in intimacy, in your relationship, in bed?

  1. Fear of hurting them or causing a fight11%
  2. I tried asking in the past and it didn’t go well…33%
  3. I don’t have the words for it yet11%
  4. I might want too much67%
  5. Im not sure even what I want33%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 18 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Global Intimacy Community: Women*/FLINTA only community” (@global_intimacy_community), 66 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/global_intimacy_community.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.