Channel
@glitched_ardes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032744225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glitched_ardes |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glitched_ardes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 211 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 210 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 210 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (14 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,503 |
| Reactions total | 145 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
182 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5204236499905711726 | 60 | 33.0% | |
| 💅 | 45 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5204140769379650905 | 41 | 22.5% | |
| 🍾 | 25 | 13.7% | |
| 👾 | 11 | 6.04% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Атака #9 + все мести Всё, артфайт кончился. Интересный был опыт, интересных осок я повидал и стал чувствовать себя в рендере поувереннее, хоть я и делал быстрый рендер, не вдаваясь в детали. Теперь пришло время заняться заказными долгами и другими интересными штуками #artfight2026 #glitched_ardes
custom 52041407693796509059
Ребят, а у вас вообще картинки нормально грузятся или как? Просто лично у меня всё плохо и большую часть каналов крайне сложно просматривать
Атака #8 "Symphony" на @merlizetdi -Я на артфайте- Пожалуй, одна из лучших работ за весь артфайт :P Сама идея арта была и вовсе вдохновлена стилем автора персонажа 👀 #glitched_ardes #artfight2026 #hollowknight
custom 520423649990571172614custom 52041407693796509052
Атака #7 "In my dreams..." -Я на артфайте- Эта атака должна была быть по счёту второй, но мне нужно было размяться перед ней и по итогу, скорее всего, потратил чуть больше 4х часов, но оно того стоило) #glitched_ardes #artfight2026 #hollowknight
custom 520423649990571172611custom 52041407693796509054💅3
Атака #6 "Blink!" -Я на артфайте- Красивый жучок. Красивый панцирь. Всьо... #glitched_ardes #glitched_ardes #hollowknight
💅6🍾4custom 52042364999057117263custom 52041407693796509052
Атака #5 "<3" на @ToTsinest -Я на артфайте- На протяжении всего АФ я пробую уводить свой стиль в разные техники, дабы выявить что-то интересное для дальнейшей работы, а тут и вовсе решил сделать что-то "погрязнее" :] #artfight2026 #glitched_ardes
custom 52041407693796509059💅7custom 52042364999057117265
Атака #4 "Deadly silk" -Я на артфайте- Я не знаю как так вышло, что один из популярных типов существ на АФ это жуки из ХК, но это так. (Либо я везучий) Это не жалоба, а просто как факт. Вообще я давно хотел порисовать ОСок по этому миру и тут представился случай) К сожалению конкретно этот арт, скорее всего, останется без внимания автора этого красивого жука, но заметил я это уже поздновато, да и сама работа шла х…
custom 52042364999057117269👾3custom 52041407693796509051
🔻Коллаба с #glitched_ardes
💅8👾2custom 52041407693796509051
Посмотрите какой сок сделал друг 👀
Атака #3 "Улыбается - значит добрый)" на @oppihere -Я на артфайте- Во-первых, я давно хотел что-то сделать конкретно этому художнику, потому что её стиль прям ВКУСНОТА. Рад что представилась такая возможность) Во-вторых, я захотел попробовать для снова методику работя от пятна, что вышло очень даже хорошо для передачи воздушности, а... В-третьих,, НА ЭТО УШЛО 3 ЧАСА ИЗ 4Х, КАК. Скорее всего я слишком проникся конц…
🍾12custom 52041407693796509057custom 52042364999057117265👾1
Атака #2 "Fluffy" -Я на артфайте- Как же сложно рисовать шерсть... именно поэтому я на артфайте понабрал всяких пушистиков в закладки :D А вообще, это далеко не последняя атака с ОС по хк))) #artfight2026 #glitched_ardes #hollowknight
💅8👾5🍾3custom 52041407693796509051
Атака #1 "The glamorous lizard" на @DragonNesty -Я на артфайте- Драконов/ящеров я почти не рисовал, но тут мне что-то так приглянулся дизайн этого чувака, что сразу захотелось его сделать. Я хотел прорисовать крутые рога, но мне резко стало лень :p, к тому же время поджимало. P.s. чтобы не перегореть и подкачать свой скилл я решил отводить на все атаки до 4х часов работы, в конце посмотрим что станет с моим скиллом…
💅13🍾6custom 52041407693796509055custom 52042364999057117262
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @glitched_ardes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 185,967 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глюканутый Ардес” (@glitched_ardes), 211 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glitched_ardes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.