Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Екатерина Глинникова

Channel

Екатерина Глинникова

@glinnikovak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

586subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291116630
TypeChannel
Username@glinnikovak
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glinnikovak

Growth

586587586.510 Aug 2026, 18:16 — 587 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:12 — 586 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:1611 Aug 2026, 13:12
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 586–587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:12586-1
10 Aug 2026, 18:16587first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.2%
avg views ÷ 586 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (29 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total479
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

654 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35654.4%
🔥11117.0%
❤‍🔥599.02%
🍓233.52%
💯192.91%
💔172.60%
😍172.60%
🥰142.14%
👏71.07%
🤷‍♂60.917%
🍾40.612%
🕊40.612%
🤗40.612%
🤩40.612%
🙏30.459%
👻20.306%
😨20.306%
10.153%
👍10.153%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 654reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glinnikovak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC79 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

с 22 августа ухожу в отпуск 🍧

7😍5❤‍🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC125 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

+ одна большая победа поддержать подкаст 🌟🕊️❤️

11🔥4👏1

26 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC275 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

жизнь сейчас, новое всё. поддержать подкаст 🌟🕊️❤️

16🔥3🥰2

13 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC415 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

бесит свой голос в записи? аудио, видео… не могу себя слушать. довольно часто я слышала эту фразу от разных учеников за всё время работы. раздражает, не могу смотреть, слушать. всё в груди сжимается – какой ужас, скорее выключи. если вдруг у вас такие же ощущения от прослушивания собственного исполнения, этот пост будет полезен. первое и самое важное, на мой взгляд: то, как вы себя слышите, сильно отличается от т

17🔥7😍4❤‍🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC339 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

лето 26’ •медитирую •молюсь •матерюсь •пою •вернулась в зал коллективная усталость всего мира чувствуется, вышеперечисленная рутина не дает утонуть в этом.

26🔥7😍3❤‍🔥2

21 Jun 2026, 11:26 UTC464 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026

21 июня. Лето, на улице солнце. И, кажется, надо гулять и жить скорее. Оно же у нас такое короткое, лето. Но я лежу и смотрю в окно, как шелестят листья деревьев и шумит Ленинградка, слышу пение птиц и лай собак. Каждую секунду идёт жизнь, а я лежу в тёплой одежде и сверху пледом. Я чувствую пустоту, тишину, тепло и долгожданную ясность. Что я – это хорошо для мира. И этот опыт нужен. Мне остаётся только – быть.

26😍5🕊3💯1

18 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC467 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026

так, я начинаю 🌺 Когда я вела блог зимой, меня спрашивали о консультациях. И это вызывало у меня непонимание и напряжение, потому что из психологического образования у меня только жизненный опыт, а по привычке я звала всех петь. Май был прожит больше внутри. Я мало что-то транслировала и будто созревала к чему-то. Я учу петь уже восемь лет. Были периоды, когда люди приходили просто поговорить, поделиться болью. Б

18🔥9💯6❤‍🔥4

8 Jun 2026, 15:55 UTC417 views57 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я забыла вам сказать «Ясно же» попала в плейлисты Яндекс музыки и VK ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ спасибо большое, каждому кто слушает и слышит

37🔥13👏6🍾1

6 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC416 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌺☕️ жить жизнь

🍓2317🔥4

1 Jun 2026, 13:42 UTC484 views54 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я неделю прожила с вот этой сладкой собачкой. По-началу переживала, от ответственности и мой мозг рисовал самые страшные картинки, как обычно. Но оказалась в море бесконечной и забытой для себя нежности и ласке. Теперь думаю, что я собачница 🐾🖤

32❤‍🔥8🔥7🤩4💯3

22 May 2026, 12:33 UTC555 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026

закрываю свой хор 💫 время пришло обожаю дни, когда просыпаюсь с ясной головой.

💔147🔥4🙏2

15 May 2026, 17:14 UTC667 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

про зависть. лет до 12 была уверенна, что я звезда и меня хранят ангелы. Грехом не считала и не завидовала никому. На исповеди – вы помните, говорила чисто по списку. У папы была всегда фишка – сравнивать семьи, и у кого больше детей, те круче: вы должны жить, как они, или у этих вот то. И я сопротивлялась внутри, матерясь, конечно же, не говоря вслух, и при этом всём себя успокаивала тем, что и на твоей улице, Катя

23🔥13💯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @glinnikovak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 877,413 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Екатерина Глинникова” (@glinnikovak), 586 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glinnikovak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.