Channel
@glazamoiglaza
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001466880388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glazamoiglaza |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glazamoiglaza |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 187 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 183 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
111 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 42 | 37.8% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 26.1% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 16.2% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 10.8% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 6.31% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.901% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.901% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я придумала вам планы на 18-19 июля Приезжайте в Москву на интенсив к моей подруге и коллеге Люде Сарычевой. Будете учиться понимать аудиторию, строить коммуникацию в продукте и зарабатывать деньги. Это всегда приятно🙂↕️ Люда — основательница бюро Гладлакс, маркетолог, редактор, автор «Уступите место драме» и соавтор бестселлера «Пиши, сокращай». А ещё Люда просто супер. И это чуть ли не самое важное! Детали, ме…
❤4😁3🔥2
Чтобы табличка не выглядела убого на старом здании и её разрешили разместить на ратуше — возьмите в руки краску 📍Dobbiaco, Dolomites
🔥8
Что не так с Бургеркингом, который выдал такой чек ради одного мороженого?
😁3💯1
айм сорри, а вы видели, что у мундиаля в этом году классный графичный лого и бодрая айдентика?
🔥9😱2
А вот у поездов метро — нет Невозможно понять, в какую сторону мы едем (я сейчас уже и сама не помню)
У парижских платформ хороший UX Электрички здесь бывают двух типов — длинные и короткие, поэтому на платформах есть наклейки, которые показывают, где остановится поезд. Длину поезда можно посмотреть на табло, а ещё её дополнительно объявляют в громкоговоритель перед прибытием электрички. Лайк!
❤9
В тёмной теме у машинки Я.Такси включены фары. Люблю такое внимание к деталям
💯7
rothko.joonas.wtf — сайт, который подбирает картину Ротко, более всего подходящую к текущей погоде в Белграде так, с чем я очень согласна
❤6😱3🔥1
Красивые упаковки кофе. Нравится, что кружочки с информацией о зерне можно использовать как бир(кофе?)декели 📍Wagmi Coffee, Limassol
🔥7
Блевотное ускорение электроавтомобилей Я думала, все электротачки объединяет одна проблема — ублюдское ускорение, не поддающееся законам физики. Но нет! Оказывается, большинство просто не умеет строить машины, а китайский бренд Changan, о существовании которого я узнала вчера, справился. Уже второй раз еду в такси и не хочется блевануть при старте. И это не про умение водителя плавно нажать на педаль тормоза или газ…
🤯1
Телеграм, а что с уведомлялками о реакциях случилось..
💯10👍1
Кайфанула от этикетки. Печать не отличить от надписи карандашом, сделанной секунду назад
❤8🔥5😱2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @glazamoiglaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“глаза мои глаза” (@glazamoiglaza), 187 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glazamoiglaza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.