Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рест| Глаза, а внутри солнце

Channel

Рест| Глаза, а внутри солнце

@glaza_a_vnutre_colnze

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

572subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002260765541
TypeChannel
Username@glaza_a_vnutre_colnze
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/glaza_a_vnutre_colnze

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5185745466 August 2026 — 518 subscribers6 August 2026 — 518 subscribers7 August 2026 — 519 subscribers14 August 2026 — 547 subscribers22 August 2026 — 571 subscribers28 August 2026 — 569 subscribers5 September 2026 — 574 subscribers13 September 2026 — 572 subscribers5726 August 202613 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 510–582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 22:41572-2
5 Sept 2026, 11:20574+5
28 Aug 2026, 19:58569-2
22 Aug 2026, 17:57571+24
14 Aug 2026, 19:14547+28
7 Aug 2026, 07:57519+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:32518no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:47518first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

389 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534160837887342467816542.4%
❤‍🔥7820.1%
❤7318.8%
💘4110.5%
custom 5314615858037802042174.37%
🥰82.06%
💔71.80%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glaza_a_vnutre_colnze. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC68 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тысячу раз простите, чуаку будут завтра, простите

❤10💘2custom 53146158580378020422

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC71 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @testy_live

Федя — психолог, который говорит: «Устройтесь, как вам будет удобно». Гоголь ложится ему на колени, Достоевский, чуть смущённо шарясь в бумагах, после произносит: «Николай Васильевич! Диван там, я не говорящий диван». Гоголь нервно захихикал и всё же поправил очки, но так и не слез. Произнеся «Док, вы такой мягкий, не хочу слазить, мне удобно».

❤15💘5❤‍🔥2

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC91 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/glaza_a_vnutre_colnze Можно, пожалуйста, голос, поооооожалуйста!

custom 53146158580378020426❤1

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC97 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Чуть-чуть поактивнее

custom 53146158580378020429❤2❤‍🔥2💘1

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC103 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ваааау!

custom 53416083788734246789❤1💘1

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC111 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

По поводу этой работы. Я вдохновилась работой Дозы, где она рассказала своё отношение к любви, а я хотела написать работу, где расскажу о своих каких-то проблемах, но так вышло, что ничего не вышло. Посередине работы я просто пробежалась глазами по тексту, найдя из чего-то похожего на меня лишь одно слово. По итогу сама работа не вышла, я начала обманывать себя и потеряла суть, потому простите, если работа вышла пло…

custom 534160837887342467817💘3❤1

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC99 views47 reactions10 Starsread 6 August 2026

Я помню, был такой человек в моей жизни — Дазай Осаму, кажется, так его звали. Мы с ним познакомились довольно давно и не виделись примерно столько же, но, наверное, об этом я и не жалею. Просто не хотелось вспоминать этого человека. Не люблю я предателей. Исходя из моих воспоминаний, он, Дазай, всегда был под впечатлением от моих эмоций. Это и понятно: он был таким странным. Будто осколочек стекла или льда — вот и в…

❤‍🔥24💘11custom 534160837887342467810❤2

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC88 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Речь идёт от первого лица. Мне всегда казалось, что мои друзья — вовсе не мои друзья. Я не знаю, что это за чувство, но оно всегда настигало меня и хлестало до тех пор, пока кровь не заливала глаза. Мои эмоции почему-то мне не нравятся: такие странные и разнообразные. Мне говорят, что это здорово — иметь яркие эмоции, и уметь радоваться — дар. Но я так не считал и не считаю. Что хорошего в том, чтобы вестись на пово…

custom 534160837887342467817❤‍🔥4💘4❤2

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC103 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как думаете, менять аву канала? Мне лично она больше нравится

custom 534160837887342467815❤7💘2💔1

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC103 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026

— Николай был готов разреветься, но сдерживал потоки эмоций. Он лишь поднял опущенную голову и уставился высоко-высоко на яркие звёзды, собирая их в созвездия. — Коля, прости... — пролепетал Достоевский и кинулся на Николая с объятиями. Он бы никогда не хотел его отпускать, но работы было много, он боялся отношений. Кто бы вообще мог подумать, что не Коля тогда был маленьким, а Фёдор был настолько мал и глуп, что о…

❤‍🔥26custom 534160837887342467816🥰8💘3❤2

Signed Хранительница

6 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC102 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Фёдор и Николай жили по соседству. Балкон делила лишь маленькая ограда и стенка, через которую с лёгкостью можно было перемахнуть, всего лишь подпрыгнув. Пейзаж за панелью балкона так и веял скукой. Серые панельные дома с погашенными окнами, разбитые клумбы, полуразвалившиеся лавочки и ржавая детская площадка — не вид, а сказка. Достоевский наконец отпрянул от монитора, протирая красноватые глаза. Мешки крупными пят…

custom 534160837887342467815❤‍🔥5💘5❤2

Signed Хранительница

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @glaza_a_vnutre_colnze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рест| Глаза, а внутри солнце” (@glaza_a_vnutre_colnze), 572 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glaza_a_vnutre_colnze.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.