Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Главредная

Channel

Главредная

@glavrednaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131511655
TypeChannel
Username@glavrednaya
Created13 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/glavrednaya

Growth

165168166.57 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 165 subscribers15 August 2026 — 168 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:57168+3
8 Aug 2026, 16:02165no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:42165first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 October 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1541.7%
👍1027.8%
513.9%
🤯411.1%
👎25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2021 to 14 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Apr 2022, 17:16 UTC718 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Совпадение? Не думаю 🤔

😁2

30 Mar 2022, 19:01 UTC≈13,200 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лера Кудрявцева задумалась…

😁5

30 Mar 2022, 17:58 UTC836 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А хотелось бы — сахара…

😁2

30 Mar 2022, 08:01 UTC795 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если два бревна запрыгнут друг на друга, то это еще не значит, что это «откровенная фотосессия»

5👍3

29 Mar 2022, 15:49 UTC589 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый анекдот от жены Петросяна прямиком из «Кривого зеркала»

👍3

29 Mar 2022, 08:11 UTC538 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Золотой спикер» и просто пиарщик Олечки Бузовой 🥲

28 Mar 2022, 18:37 UTC568 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

У нас на днях снималась суперзвезда всех красных дорожек и любительница премий с бесплатным алкоголем Анна Калашникова. Что хочу сказать — Калашникова и Арбатова (писательница, которая ходит по ток-шоу) это лучший каст для нашего шоу «Поясни За»! Вот вам видео проходки Аньки, которая запрягла нашего охранника для съемки 🥲 Еще и коробку с травой где-то зацепила.. надо проверить, на месте ли.

😁3👍1

28 Mar 2022, 18:25 UTC486 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @geegunchillVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

14 Mar 2022, 13:26 UTC869 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Волочкова спровоцировала возбуждение уголовного дела. Смотреть без регистрации и СМС

🤯4

14 Mar 2022, 12:34 UTC786 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все-таки не уберегли инстаграм от Оли…

14 Mar 2022, 06:39 UTC680 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @byzovahouseVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @glavrednaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Главредная” (@glavrednaya), 168 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glavrednaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.