Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GLAGOLEVA.PHOTO

Channel

GLAGOLEVA.PHOTO

@glagoleva_photo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

375subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775712243
TypeChannel
Username@glagoleva_photo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/glagoleva_photo

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3723763746 August 2026 — 373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 373 subscribers14 August 2026 — 372 subscribers27 August 2026 — 374 subscribers2 September 2026 — 376 subscribers11 September 2026 — 375 subscribers3756 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 16:39375-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:58376+2
27 Aug 2026, 15:53374+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:54372-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:33373no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:20373first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9638.1%
❤‍🔥4618.3%
💔3614.3%
👍249.52%
😍155.95%
💯114.37%
custom 5397996703854902142103.97%
custom 542236987016558489883.17%
💘51.98%
👀10.397%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @glagoleva_photo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC80 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На нашей встрече 31 августа мы будем совмещать фотосессию с техникой МАК. Проводить её будет Мария Панова, дипломированный и практикующий психолог и МАК-терапевт. В прошлом году Маша тоже была на итальянском фотодне и после него предложила мне сделать что-то совместное для женского круга. Так родились наши фотомакпрактики. И мне видится, что подытожить лето таким образом будет очень здорово! Маша говорит, что ассо

❤‍🔥5👍4

Signed Катерина Глаголева

5 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC108 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥14💔9

Signed Катерина Глаголева

5 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC124 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Решила последний день лета отметить фотоднем на этой прекрасной итальянской вилле. А еще, пригласила к нам на него Марию, психолога и специалиста по метафорическим картам. Психологическую сессию мы проводить с вами не будем, но поговорим про уходящее лето, его моменты, инсайты, про то, что берем с собой в осень… про ресурсы, которыми лето нас наградило. А Мак-карты помогут нам сделать это легко и даже весело. Мне

🔥8❤‍🔥5

Signed Катерина Глаголева

1 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC217 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ух! 🔥 Сегодня у меня была ужасно интересная съемка: в команде со стилистом Светланой Токаревой мы решали задачи прекрасных дам через их образ в одежде. Задачи у всех были бизнесовые, но разные! Начали с такого запроса: нужно фото для аватарки или анонса к какому-то мероприятию. Но не строго-экспертное, а расслабленное и располагающее к себе. Потом было такое: нужен образ под стартап аудиторию: динамичный, открыт

🔥25❤‍🔥12custom 53979967038549021426

Signed Катерина Глаголева

1 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC194 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Очень хочется делиться летними фотографиями и впечатлениями моих героинь с нашей итальянской виллы 🇮🇹 - Катя, ну что за роскошь!🤍 Ты умеешь видеть какую-то очень тонкую красоту, которую очень легко растерять в будничной суете. Это как очень хорошее зеркало с правильным и бережным светом) Подумалось, что быть для женщины хорошим зеркалом с правильным и бережным светом - это очень классный скил)

🔥16💯9💘5

Signed Катерина Глаголева

31 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC191 views20 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

У любимого Яковлева прочитала такую вот мысль ⬆️и она во мне очень отозвалась. И пост мой предыдущий как раз где-то тоже про это: там, где живет наш интерес, там есть и энергия🔥 Например: Работа не интересная и на неё, действительно, еле идут ноги и вяло работается, прям нет энергии. Никак не можете встретиться с друзьями? А может просто уже не так интересно и поэтому нет сил на встречи? Не можете стабильно ходи

👍12🔥7👀1

Signed Катерина Глаголева

31 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC169 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @revolution50

Давайте я вам задам вот какой вопрос. У кого из вас есть ощущение, что вам часто не хватает энергии? А почему не хватает? Обычно отвечают: много работаю, или много времени отнимают дети, или мало занимаюсь спортом. Но в реальности это не так. Видите, у нас довольно искажённые представления об энергии. Энергия — это не то, что кончается или иссякает в результате какой-то деятельности. Энергия — это то, что даёт ил

👍8💯2

Signed Катерина Глаголева

31 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC156 views26 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я практически всегда спрашиваю моих героинь, сколько им лет. Мне это нужно не только для понимания возраста моей аудитории, но и для её анализа. Очень много подмечаю, как около 40 лет женщины кардинально меняют сферу деятельности. Многие заново идут учиться, но уже туда, куда тянет всей душой. Я слушаю и каждый раз говорю «Ух ты!», это очень вдохновляет. **** Помню, как Лена рассказывала, что ужасно любит мир ткан

🔥26

Signed Катерина Глаголева

30 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC172 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ух. Смотрим с мужем сериал «The Beauty» Очень классно снят: сюжет актуальный и динамичный, втягиваешься моментально, смотреть хочется залпом, но мы растягиваем. Суть такова, что изобретена сыворотка-вирус, от которого твое тело преображается до своих идеальных настроек: больше нет боли, нет последствия того, что ты переедаешь или злоупотребляешь чем-то, не надо ходить в спортзал для поддержки тела, его метаболизм в

💔27custom 53979967038549021424

Signed Катерина Глаголева

28 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC190 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Купить пухликов - ✅ Любоваться пухликами- ✅ На рижском рынке они по 150-200р😉

❤‍🔥24😍15custom 54223698701655848988

Signed Катерина Глаголева

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @glagoleva_photo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GLAGOLEVA.PHOTO” (@glagoleva_photo), 375 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glagoleva_photo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.