Channel
@gj912
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,844subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002686044445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gj912 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gj912 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @gj912/8104 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC | @xw966/77475 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gj912/8106 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC | @xw966/77495 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gj912/8110 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC | @xw966/77515 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gj912/8117 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC | @xw966/77586 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gj912/8118 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC | @xw966/77596 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gj912/8122 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC | @xw966/77636 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @xw966 | 17 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (17–0) |
| @xinwen663 | 12 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 18 hours | this entry (12–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 28 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @xinjiapo199. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 9,844 | -38 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 9,882 | -98 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 9,980 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 9,991 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,391 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 越南🫰胡志明市·河内·旅游攻略［新闻资讯］ 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 泰国华人柬埔寨新闻曝光 📢 西港日记 柬埔寨快讯 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 东南亚吃瓜新闻资讯 📢 【华联社】柬中時報 📢 宁波樱厅 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
在 Telegram 里找内容，先打开 SOSO 搜搜。 频道、群组、帖子、贴纸都可以搜；也可以从发现页继续浏览。
沙巴20名外籍人士逾期逗留认罪 分判罚款及监禁刑罚 马来西亚沙巴法庭8月11日审理多起外籍人士非法滞留案件，共计20名外籍被告触犯移民法令并当庭认罪。其中17名中国男子因逾期逗留被控，法官依法判处每人罚款1万令吉，无力缴罚者将以6个月监禁替代。另有2名印尼男子、1名菲律宾男子同罪被控，庭审裁定2名印尼籍男子入狱12个月，菲律宾籍男子入狱6个月。所有被告在完成罚款缴纳或刑期服刑后，将统一移交移民局后续处置。
泰国前议员近距离枪杀府级高官 监控全程记录作案过程 8月11日，暖武里府发生恶性枪击命案。监控画面完整还原事发经过，前国会议员查龙·里乌伦尾随暖武里府行政委员会主席上车，二人短暂交谈数秒后，查龙突然近距离开枪，当场射杀这名府级领导人。据悉案件源于千万泰铢债务纠纷，嫌疑人作案后主动致电直播节目认罪，随后向警方自首。遇难官员头部、颈部中弹伤重不治，随行司机亦遭波及受伤，目前警方已介入彻查作案动机、枪支来源等细节。
越南男子遭女友半夜驱赶怀恨行凶 故意伤人获刑12年 8月10日，义安省人民法院宣判一起恶性伤人案件。44岁男子梁文雄（洪某）因情感纠纷行凶，被判12年监禁。据悉，梁文雄2023年与年长6岁的女子维氏绒同居，后期双方频繁爆发矛盾。2025年底女方要求其搬离引发冲突，今年3月19日，二人亲密过后，女方再次驱赶梁文雄，使其心生怨恨。梁文雄持剪刀多次刺向女方要害，造成其身体63%损伤。案发后梁文雄主动自首，法院综合案情以杀人罪定罪，同时判令其赔偿受害者1.73亿越南盾。
印度男子因饭菜上菜慢杀嫂 骇人抛尸悬挂树上遭逮捕 新德里8月10日消息，比哈尔邦发生一起极端家庭惨案。22岁男子库纳尔因不满25岁大嫂备餐速度过慢，二人爆发口角，他随即情绪失控持斧行凶，致大嫂当场身亡。案发后男子手段残忍，砍下死者头颅悬挂在房前榕树上，自身静坐家门口等待，最终被目击村民报警抓获。当地村民透露，嫌疑人长期染有毒瘾，疑似毒发失控作案，目前警方已介入侦办，暂未证实毒品与案件的直接关联。
泰国暖武里府行政组织主席遭枪击受伤 前国会议员作案后自首 2026年8月10日，暖武里府行政组织（PAO）办公室附近发生枪击事件，警方接报后立即派员赶赴现场调查。警员到场后发现，暖武里府行政组织主席通猜·延普拉瑟特警上校及其司机中枪受伤，两人随即被紧急送往医院接受治疗。 警方通报，肇事者为前暖武里府国会议员查龙·里昂朗。事发后，查龙已主动向警方自首。目前，当局正对事件细节展开深入调查，收集现场证据并询问目击证人，以查明案件起因及具体经过。受伤人员的治疗进展及案件后续法律程序备受关注。
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》 📢 《🇬🇾东南亚新闻》东南亚资讯|东南亚曝光 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 soso东南亚-百科🌍 📢 东南亚大事件｜大事件曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 泰国越南马来西亚新闻曝光 📢 菲律宾|新闻大事件 📢 缅甸新闻|果敢老街新闻|佤邦新闻|小勐拉新闻 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
SOSO 搜搜 把 Telegram 搜索和发现放在一个入口。 想继续找频道、群组、帖子或贴纸，直接输入关键词。 也可以从发现页继续浏览同类入口。
印尼巴淡岛夜总会涉毒案凌晨突袭 警方拘捕32人 2026年8月10日凌晨1时许（印尼西部时间），印尼国家警察缉毒局联合国家情报局特别工作组，对廖内群岛巴淡岛的HH Club Planet 3.0酒吧及KTV夜总会展开突击行动，破获一起涉嫌贩毒案件。 印尼国家警察刑事调查局毒品犯罪局局长埃科·哈迪·桑托索准将当日于雅加达表示，此次行动由刑事调查局毒品犯罪局第四分局与国家情报局特别工作组联合执行，现场共抓获32人，其中包括嫌疑人和证人。联合小组在行动中还缴获了多份毒品证据。 埃科透露，关于案件详情及具体披露时间顺序，将在对嫌疑人及证人完成讯问后统一公布。目前警方正加紧调查，以厘清该夜总会涉毒网络的全貌。巴淡岛作为廖内群岛的重要城市，此次突袭行动显示出执法部门对娱乐场所毒品犯罪的高压态势，后续调查进展备受关注。
泰国华欣“黎明行动”扫荡土地欺诈 200余警力出动涉案资产3亿泰铢 2026年8月10日，泰国皇家警察总司令诺帕西尔·普尔萨瓦特中将发起代号“黎明行动”的大规模执法行动，调动巴蜀府警察局、移民警察局、曼谷大都会警察局及第七区调查局共计200余名警员，依据45余份针对外国人和泰国公民的逮捕令与搜查令，在华欣地区展开地毯式目标清查。 行动由第七警区副司令孔查温·普拉塔纳农少将、巴蜀府警察局局长阿通·钦通少将及华欣警察局局长坎帕纳·纳·维猜上校现场指挥，重点打击一个长期在华欣从事土地所有权欺诈交易的犯罪网络，当局初步估算涉案资产总值约达3亿泰铢。 此外，他还将通报另一起毒品走私案中缴获约160公斤冰毒的重大进展。目前，关于嫌疑人身份、具体搜查区域及查获资产的完整清单，仍有待警方正式公告确认。
马来西亚柔佛州娱乐中心遭突击搜查 209名外籍女客服被扣查 8月9日凌晨，柔佛州警方在诺达行动区展开大规模突击行动，对12家娱乐中心同时搜查。行动持续约7小时，从凌晨2时15分至上午9时，共逮捕222人，包括209名外籍女客服接待员（年龄19至40岁）及13名保安。被捕外籍女性中，越南籍93人、泰国籍87人、老挝籍11人、印尼籍7人、缅甸籍6人、菲律宾籍5人。44人毒品检测呈阳性，7人有犯罪前科。 警方依据《移民法》及柔佛州娱乐场所法令展开调查，涉及无有效旅行证件、逾期居留等违法行为。13名保安已还押候审，209名外籍女性被扣留作进一步调查。
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @gj912. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,106,527 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚热点新闻 | 热点事件” (@gj912), 9,844 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gj912.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.