Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚大家庭【头条新闻】

Channel

东南亚大家庭【头条新闻】

@GJXW8

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

11,296subscribers

+1,652 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002702349253
TypeChannel
Username@GJXW8
Description聚焦东南亚华人新闻与社会动态,分享生活故事、文化交流与真实见闻。 热点追踪、突发快讯、社会暗角...每日揭露你所不知的真相 深度曝光、新闻揭秘、实时热点 我们关注每一位海外华人的声音,让你了解区域热点、见证身边故事。 声明:网友投稿内容频道只负责投稿发布信息,真假自行甄别,理性吃瓜,恶意投稿,后果自负! 投稿删帖: @qip91 @jia95
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GJXW8

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@GJXW8/13579 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC@TGHH66/425048 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC1.0023 hours
@GJXW8/13586 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC@TGHH66/425339 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC1.0024 hours
@TGHH66/4256110 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC@GJXW8/13609 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC1.0022 hours
@TGHH66/4262213 Aug 2026, 01:22 UTC@GJXW8/13638 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC1.0036 hours
@TGHH66/4271116 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC@GJXW8/13656 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC1.009.8 hours
@TGHH66/4283321 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC@GJXW8/13722 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC1.002 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@TGHH6611 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 hours@TGHH66 (8–3)
@gj9125 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 hours@gj912 (5–0)
@taiguo3335 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 hours@taiguo333 (5–0)
@tudou_baoguang5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 hours@tudou_baoguang (5–0)
@Banma_xinwen5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 hours@Banma_xinwen (5–0)
@dongnanya_xinbibaoguang5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 hours@dongnanya_xinbibaoguang (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 33 of the 33 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 291 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,47011,9059,687.56 August 2026 — 9,644 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,700 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,639 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,504 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,418 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,354 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,204 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,098 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,950 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,642 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,526 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,470 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,402 subscribers11 October 2026 — 10,344 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,305 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,289 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,250 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,235 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,206 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,180 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,193 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,154 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,139 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,134 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,143 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,151 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,157 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,179 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,164 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,166 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,158 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,169 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,174 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,149 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,358 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,905 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,771 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,571 subscribers12 November 2026 — 11,296 subscribers11,2966 August 202612 November 2026
42 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,652. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,805–12,570 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 22:1111,296-275
10 Nov 2026, 14:0611,571-200
9 Nov 2026, 00:2111,771-134
7 Nov 2026, 14:0411,905+1,547
6 Nov 2026, 13:0810,358+209
5 Nov 2026, 11:3710,149-25
4 Nov 2026, 08:4510,174+5
3 Nov 2026, 10:3110,169+11
1 Nov 2026, 11:2510,158-8
31 Oct 2026, 08:5610,166+2
30 Oct 2026, 05:4910,164-15
29 Oct 2026, 06:5410,179+22
28 Oct 2026, 01:4610,157+6
26 Oct 2026, 22:5610,151+8
25 Oct 2026, 21:2710,143+9
24 Oct 2026, 20:4510,134-5
23 Oct 2026, 19:2710,139-15
22 Oct 2026, 17:0810,154-39
21 Oct 2026, 09:0610,193+13
19 Oct 2026, 04:5910,180first reading

Engagement

337 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.99%
avg views ÷ 11,296 subscribers
Avg views / post
902
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 337 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held337 (5 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total134,466
Reactions total2,497
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,920
Videos
≈350
Links
≈72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 42s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,497 reactions across 149 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰37715.1%
🎉36314.5%
👏36014.4%
❤35814.3%
👍35414.2%
🔥35314.1%
😁33213.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 337 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 173 posts held from the last 30 days (1.73%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 03:58 UTC443 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国北榄府两车相撞,女骑手身亡、男骑手受伤 2069年11月14日晚7点30分,泰国北榄府邦浦警局接到交通事故报案,直辖县帕埃克萨路乌汶里村对面路段发生两辆摩托车相撞事故,造成一死一伤。 警方联动救援人员赶赴现场处置,在道路中央隔离带路灯杆底部发现31岁女子尼塔亚的遗体,其身负多处重伤。不远处,一辆蓝色本田PCX摩托车严重侧翻损毁。另一名56岁男骑手桑关左肩受伤,经急救处理后被送往医院救治。 据伤者供述,他当时驾车准备变道掉头,未完成变道时,后方驶来的女骑手车辆撞上其车尾,致使两车失控。目前警方已完成现场勘查取证,将调取周边监控、讯问涉事人员,核查事故真相并依法推进后续流程。 【事件见解】 道路行车瞬息万变,保持安全车距、谨慎驾驶,是规避惨烈车祸的关键!

❤6👏4😁3🎉2🥰2👍1

15 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC444 views26 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国阁骨岛海面查获大批走私香烟,疑为沉船快艇所载货物 2026年11月14日清晨,泰国阁骨岛渔民在海面发现被海浪冲上岸的大批香烟包裹,随即上报相关部门。同日,当地居民也在近海海面捡到三个漂浮包裹并移交警方核查。经达叻府警方与税务局查验,确认这批物品为非法走私香烟,估值达200万至300万泰铢,现已全部被依法没收。 据阁骨镇镇长德查通·占鄂透露,2026年11月11日至12日夜间,一艘无注册快艇在附近海域触礁沉没。结合线索推测,该快艇涉嫌走私作业,船员常用LINE群组联络对接,此次漂浮香烟大概率为沉船遗留货物。目前警方已全力追查涉案货主下落。 【事件见解】 海上走私隐患极大,沉船遗留赃物暴露走私链条,当地亟需强化海域巡查封堵走私漏洞!

👍7❤4🥰4👏3🔥3😁3🎉2

15 Nov 2026, 03:55 UTC979 views19 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

马来西亚沙巴商业区爆发命案,男子劝架遭刺身亡,警方全力追缉嫌犯 11月14日凌晨4时30分,沙巴亚庇孟加达苏拉曼中环商业区发生致命刺杀案。38岁男嫌犯因商铺经营纠纷追打摊贩,在场31岁男子见状上前劝阻,不幸遭嫌犯持切肉刀刺中右胸重伤倒地。 伤者被任职广场保安的哥哥紧急送医救治,但经抢救无效,于当日清晨6时44分宣告不治。据悉,嫌犯为该广场看守员,纠纷源于其友人此前在涉事店铺经营遭终止,心生不满蓄意滋事。 警方现场查获外套、烟蒂、血液样本等证物,死者遗体已送往医院,定于15日进行解剖核验。目前警方援引刑事法典302条文谋杀罪展开调查,持续追捕在逃嫌犯。 【事件见解】 小小商业纠纷酿成致命悲剧,冲动暴力害人害己,社会治安管控仍需持续加强!

❤4🔥4🥰3😁3🎉2👍2👏1

15 Nov 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,030 views20 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国孔敬府开展联合专项行动,抓获外籍涉黄案女子 2026年11月14日,泰国孔敬移民局联合多警种部门,发起打击人口贩运及关联犯罪专项行动,在孔敬府芒县抓获22岁老挝籍女子Som。经查,该女子于2026年11月5日持30类签证入境,违规从事卖淫活动约七天。 嫌疑人通过LINE软件招揽泰籍及外籍客户,依托线上群组接单,群组内包含多名泰、老籍涉事女性。其由中间人“努恩”引荐赴泰从业,每单600泰铢服务费中需上缴200泰铢佣金。 警方通过诱捕行动固定证据,现场查获600泰铢标记钞票、避孕套及润滑凝胶等涉案物品。目前该女子因涉嫌卖淫、非法务工,违反1979年《移民法》相关条款被拘留,警方将深挖团伙、追诉全部涉案人员。 【事件见解】 线上涉黄团伙跨境作案危害极大,精准抓捕溯源追查,有效整治跨境违法乱象!

👍6🎉5❤2👏2🥰2😁2🔥1

15 Nov 2026, 03:52 UTC≈1,030 views14 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

菲律宾警方突击搜查涉毒涉枪住所,嫌疑人提前逃窜物证被查扣 菲律宾警察区域办公室(PRO-12)通报,警方针对苏丹库达拉特省伊苏兰镇34岁男子“阿尔”,依法开具搜查令,前往其拉甘当村住所,核查其涉嫌非法持毒、私藏枪支的违法行为。 不料嫌疑人提前察觉,在执法人员抵达前顺利逃脱。本次搜查行动全程在嫌疑人妻子及法定证人见证下规范开展,警方现场查获.38口径左轮手枪、一枚手榴弹、9毫米手枪子弹,以及价值约12000比索的非法毒品。 所有涉案物品均被移交至伊苏兰警察局,完成清点登记后将送检核查。警方表示,后续将强化情报摸排,持续开展专项清查行动,严厉追责非法持有枪支、爆炸物及违禁药品的违法人员。 【事件见解】 此次行动精准查获大量违禁物品,虽嫌疑人在逃,仍有力震慑当地涉枪涉毒违法乱象!

🔥4🥰3❤2🎉2👏2😁1

15 Nov 2026, 03:51 UTC≈1,040 views20 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国连破快递物流贩毒案,查获海量冰毒抓获涉案人员 2026年11月13日上午11点45分,泰国多部门联合缉毒专班在素叻他尼府精准收网,抓获32岁涉案男子苏切塔,当场查获内含10000粒冰毒的包裹、两部手机及涉案皮卡车。 经查,涉毒包裹假借店铺名义从曼谷寄出,原定11月12日送达货运仓库,由嫌疑人专程上门取件。苏切塔对收取毒品包裹的行为供认不讳,现已被依法移交查办,涉嫌商用贩卖、非法分销一级毒品,警方正追查其同伙及完整贩毒网络。 此前在2026年11月11日,警方已在拉廊府快递公司查获6001粒冰毒,抓获收件人阿卜杜拉,同时排查出素叻他尼府存在多处可疑涉毒快递线索。 【事件见解】 警方接连破获快递运毒案件,严厉打击物流贩毒行径,有效震慑毒品违法犯罪!

🎉5🔥4❤3👍3👏3🥰2

15 Nov 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,050 views23 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

缅甸仰光突发跨国抓捕行动,一举抓获106名网络赌博涉案人员 据官方通报,11月12日晚10时45分,缅甸警方联合执法力量,在仰光沙杰塔镇区开展专项抓捕行动,成功抓获106名网络诈骗及网络赌博涉案人员,其中包含一名中方悬赏通缉在逃人员。 本次抓捕行动定点于镇区第八街区纳瓦拉特路的金色河滨公寓多个单元房。涉案人员涵盖多国人员,含48名中国籍男性、4名中国籍女性、8名越南籍男性、31名缅甸籍男性及15名缅甸籍人员,中方悬赏通缉的苏福全在列。 警方现场查获大量作案设备,包含121台电脑、5台笔记本电脑、1台服务器、190部手机、多台网络设备及数本中、缅护照与银行账本。目前涉案人员将完成核查,执法部门将依法从严追责,涉案物资将依规处置。 【事件见解】 多国联合作战重拳打击跨境网赌诈骗,严厉斩断跨境犯罪链条,极大震慑跨国违法势力!

🥰6🎉4👏4😁4❤3👍1🔥1

15 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC≈1,050 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国素叻他尼府家养大象失控袭人,致一名七旬老人身亡 2026年11月14日,泰国警方通报,11月13日晚间,素叻他尼府基里拉尼空县发生大象袭人致死事故。当地一头家养大象失控冲撞民众,造成71岁女子Boonlom身亡,一辆曼谷牌照丰田皮卡受损。 事发时,死者与丈夫等人乘车外出取祭祀用品,突遇大象冲车,众人随即下车逃窜。死者躲避时不慎跌入坑中,遭大象追袭重伤殒命。肇事大象隶属当地前村长,原本拴在事发地约500米外的溪边。 警方、救援人员与验尸官赶赴现场勘查,遗体已送检尸检。当晚11时,官方联合野保部门、村民在油棕种植园寻获并控制肇事大象,后续将依法处置。 【事件见解】 家养猛兽失控酿成悲剧,凸显相关饲养管控漏洞,亟需完善监管规避风险!

👍6👏5🎉4🔥2🥰2❤1😁1

15 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,000 views11 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

马来西亚马六甲州选竞选期查出301起违规,多为乱贴竞选宣传品 马六甲州选举14天竞选阶段一共记录301宗选举违规。选委会主席拿督斯里拉姆兰·哈伦在基西当选区马林华小投票中心受访时表示,违规大多是在路口等禁放区域张贴海报、横幅,容易阻碍交通。 基西当选区登记选民54910人,设有13个投票通道,早上8点开放投票。马六甲全州28个州议席合计240个投票中心,将于当晚6点关闭。 拉姆兰呼吁各政党重视竞选物料张贴规范,避免引发安全事故。他坦言301起并不算低,希望往后违规数量能够下降,让竞选秩序更加顺畅。 【事件见解】 违规张贴宣传物料暗藏交通安全隐患,政党应当自觉遵守选举相关规定!

🥰3🎉2👏2😁2👍1🔥1

15 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC≈1,140 views15 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

泰国普吉突发连环车祸,重型卡车失控撞毁十余车辆及市政设施 2026年11月14日上午8时20分,普吉警方接到紧急车祸报案。一辆十轮重型卡车在当地拉萨达街道三岔路口,径直冲撞多名停在红绿灯前等候通行的车辆。 辖区高阶警员即刻赶赴现场勘查,涉事卡车为碧差汶里府号牌,由驾驶员尼拉特驾驶。事故共造成10辆轿车、1辆摩托车受损,同时损毁电线杆、禁行标识等市政设施,一名皮卡驾驶人轻微受伤。 警方当场控制涉事司机,并对其进行酒精、毒品检测,同时完成现场勘查、拍照、绘制现场图等取证工作。目前事故原因尚未敲定,初步怀疑是卡车制动失灵、系统故障所致,相关调查仍在推进中。 【事件见解】 车辆制动故障极易引发重大交通事故,常态化车况检修是守护道路安全的重中之重!

🎉4🥰3❤2👏2🔥2👍1😁1

14 Nov 2026, 22:25 UTC914 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 初中生学生 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 西安艺妓 📢 全球新闻聚焦 | 📣国际热点速报 📢 初冬小远OVO 📢 东南亚大事件|华人新闻|热点爆料 📢 事件曝光 新闻爆料 📢 Telegram-新闻曝光社 📢 News from world 📢 东南亚新闻头条曝光 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励

🔥3🥰3🎉2👍2❤1👏1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 337 posts we hold for @GJXW8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 43 posts on @GJXW8 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
26

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚大家庭【头条新闻】” (@GJXW8), 11,296 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GJXW8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.