And this is what my 1000 X project has looked like for the last six months @givemetons
👍8😁4❤2

Channel
@givemetons
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,599subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216948349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @givemetons |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/givemetons |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 4,599 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 4,604 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 4,608 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:10 | 4,608 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 60.0% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2024 to 25 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
And this is what my 1000 X project has looked like for the last six months @givemetons
👍8😁4❤2
You've been asking me for a long time to send you a fragment of one of my closed streams to understand whether it's worth buying a subscription. Well. You've convinced me. Here's a fragment of my most popular stream from the closing ceremony. Insanely valuable thoughts from me that will help any newbie to get going. If the value of the subscription has been formed for you, then you are welcome Subscribe to the clo…
🤔1😁1
I have nothing new for you. Yet another guy got screwed by the Dubai synagogue. Here in TON, you truly start to grasp the meaning of "chutzpah" and "Ivan the Fool." I’m amazed that a significant number of subscribers still keep their funds on @wallet and even continue to use it. Here’s what I think will happen next: these Dubai moshiachs will freeze a few wallets belonging to the children of Durov's deputies or th…
🖕2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎉1👍1
And, by the way, a fun fact: the $500 million balance on the accounts is actually the money made from selling TON to the shaggy mammoths throughout this year.
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
A short summary of Durov's new post : I AM RICH, HAHAHAHAHA, HOW RICH AM I, HAHAHAHAHA. I HAVE A BILLION IN INCOME, HAHAHAHA. 500 MULTIPLES OF GREEN IN MY ACCOUNTS, HOW POWERFUL ARE MY PAWS I hope it is for posts like these that you subscribe to this channel.
👍1👏1
👮People often ask me why I don’t write about Open League, SBTs, or any of that blatant nonsense. Ladies and gentlemen, I don’t want to waste even a second of my time on this. It’s garbage from start to finish. Open League turned into a laughable parody by its third season, and the circus only gets worse as it goes on. Maybe some of you are busting your backs and tap-dancing for random figures from TF just to get a …
👍2❤1👎1🔥1
🤥I think after 14 hours, it's safe to say the sticker presale has failed. The hype was only enough for the smallest collections, and after that, everything died out. They can't even sell what should be the top-tier word collection, Not CAP. It's the most expensive yet the smallest collection among all the dogs. Conclusions? The endless emission of gifts has completely destroyed the positive narrative around anonym…
👍2
⭐️By the way, you can instantly get stars without KYC using @send. Just send a message to your Saved Messages with: @send (number of stars) start Then choose which currency from your balance to exchange for them. You can also send stars to a friend by sending them a similar message in chat.
👍1
The sales of the monkey collections in batches of 3333 have stalled. The ones that were sold in batches of 999 were snapped up pretty quickly, but then interest waned and the audience ran out of money 1️⃣ In general, with a higher issuance, it's obvious that we're heading to 11. We were fed with new gifts. @givemetons
👍1
By the way, if you're having trouble buying stars, you can purchase them through Peskar's service without any KYC. Here's the link: split.tg
👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @givemetons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 350,171 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@givemetons named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Give me TON!” (@givemetons), 4,599 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/givemetons.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.