Bye beautiesπ Slay as usual<3!
β€βπ₯27πΎ3β€1π1π1

Channel
@girlyy_stuff
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
134subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001512289493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @girlyy_stuff |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 14 January 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/girlyy_stuff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 134 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 135 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
209 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€βπ₯ | 50 | 23.9% | |
| β€ | 36 | 17.2% | |
| π€£ | 30 | 14.4% | |
| π | 18 | 8.61% | |
| π | 14 | 6.70% | |
| π | 11 | 5.26% | |
| π₯° | 9 | 4.31% | |
| π’ | 8 | 3.83% | |
| π | 7 | 3.35% | |
| π€ | 7 | 3.35% | |
| π | 6 | 2.87% | |
| π€ | 5 | 2.39% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 1.44% | |
| π | 2 | 0.957% | |
| π | 1 | 0.478% | |
| π | 1 | 0.478% | |
| π€© | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2023 to 11 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bye beautiesπ Slay as usual<3!
β€βπ₯27πΎ3β€1π1π1
κ° β‘οΈ κ± βMe? Self obsessed? Hell yeahhπ #π§π’π€π΅π΄ βΎοΈ @Aesthetic_Teenage β½οΈ
β€βπ₯23β€2π2
π€ Face reveal plsss post a poll everyone wanna see π₯Ίπ₯Ίβ€οΈ πͺBruhh! I didn't expect this at allπ₯²+no purpose of seeing me eitherππ₯²
π4π’2
π€ I have exams from March 15 I'm worried about it can you help me by saying some tipsss plzzz πͺPOV- You askin for study tips from someone who's mind is already fked up due to stressπ«
π€£14
π€ I've seen ya that's why im in lv with uπ I luv you a lot cryatallllπ«Άπ»π«Άπ» πͺBrowww! Im done wid this Q & Aπ₯²π +how did ya get to see me?π«
π€5
π€ Crystal! Wanna be my chammak challo!? πͺOof- I had to ask for help from ma indian friendsππcuz google translator didn't help me at allπ₯²π Anyhow i don't wanna hurt feelings tho-π
π’4
π€ Hey I don't know anything rather than I love you β€οΈβπ©Ήπ«Ά πͺUwU I do have some secret admires huh-πβ₯οΈ Ily too<3
π€7
π€ Wht do u think about me πͺWait a minute Who are you? You read it in that tone ryt?ππ
π5π1
π€ Is that you?? πͺUhh- Wdym?
π€ I know one beautiful person You know who it is ? .do u know what she is doing now ?She is reading this msg now π πͺAww whoever wrote this i owe you a huge hugπβ€οΈ
π9π1
π€ Can you complete my assignments ? πͺUmm- Will you pay me?ππ
π€£16π3β€1
π€ Babes,I LOVE YOU A LOT but im just shy to confess yaππ Looks like this gonna be an one sided loveππ πͺWhoops! Why do i've so many secret lovers!?πβ€ You should've make a move jk anyhow Ily too tho-
β€10π’2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @girlyy_stuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@girlyy_stuff named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππΎπΊππππππΊβ (@girlyy_stuff), 134 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlyy_stuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.