Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,932–1,955 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 19:00
1,951
+5
12 Sept 2026, 03:01
1,946
-6
7 Sept 2026, 12:39
1,952
+10
2 Sept 2026, 14:07
1,942
+2
30 Aug 2026, 06:08
1,940
-6
27 Aug 2026, 12:04
1,946
-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:46
1,949
+14
21 Aug 2026, 00:08
1,935
-3
17 Aug 2026, 15:29
1,938
-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:17
1,941
-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:10
1,946
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:36
1,946
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 51s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
313 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5314379914009394282
58
18.5%
custom 6185725922490977120
46
14.7%
custom 5314504373571700868
38
12.1%
❤
23
7.35%
custom 5308042513670508818
19
6.07%
custom 5307654695303545623
17
5.43%
custom 5235736120767032242
16
5.11%
custom 5283003039018404628
15
4.79%
custom 5427143228098885226
14
4.47%
custom 5474369816607342211
11
3.51%
🎉
11
3.51%
😎
11
3.51%
custom 5215672443036772796
10
3.19%
😍
6
1.92%
🦄
6
1.92%
custom 5285101804852364204
3
0.958%
custom 5308018955774888348
2
0.639%
custom 5411441407485288387
2
0.639%
😐
2
0.639%
custom 5332462834427131397
1
0.319%
2 further kinds
2
0.639%
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @girls_make_noise. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
три наблюдения:
✅
как показала практика: больше всего вы выбираете в подарок из наших стикеров Бритни
хотя спрос на Леди Гагу, Бьонсе, Лану Дель Рей и Билли Айлиш тоже бывал хорош на разных вечеринках)
это фото со стикерами с одной из вечеринок
остальные сфотографировать не всегда успеваю 😂
💙 а из жвачек больше берёте Love Is, а не Turbo
😈 а что ещё показывает практика:
билеты по 1 релизу early birds вы покупает…
помните, у нас были цветочные вечеринки в Powerhouse и GMN BLOOM ROOM в Saga
НО у нас никогда не было цветочной ГИЛТИ ПЛЕЖА!
поэтому она будет 28 августа
дресс-код: цветут цветы тут запели «Танцы Минус»
любые цветочные вариации и гавайский стиль
🌺
билетики 1 релиза уже тут
а теперь вопросик, нужна помощь зала:
какой «цветочный» трек поставить на афишу?
пишите ваши варианты в комментариях
сегодня ровно 4 года назад состоялась первая вечеринка Girls Make Noise
была она 5 августа 2022 в баре Голова, который уже закрылся
я думала сегодня, что бы такое необычное выложить по такому поводу…
и вспомнила, что в архивах есть вот такое хоум видео, снятое на VHS-камеру менеджером Паверхауса Сашей Маяк на вечеринке в GMN в Павере в июле 2024 года
маленький фрагмент из нашей истории
спасибо за эти 4 года!
все…
✅ ждёте следующую вечеринку? ✅
🍭 - да! жду ГИЛТИ ПЛЕЖА
🪩 - да! жду электронную GMN
👭 - жду обе вечеринки!
🌟 - ничего не жду, устал(а) тусоваться, можно просто полежать
🌸 - я тут чисто контент посмотреть)
видео из нашего сериала, снятого на ГИЛТИ ПЛЕЖА 14 сентября 2024 года в Мунке
2 эпизод 1 серия
В 1 час ночи за пультом два часа будет кружиться белая музыкальная фея КИРЧА
🤍 01:00 - 03:00 — КИРЧА 🤍
«Лето в этом году выдалось странным — холодным и непредсказуемым. Но мы-то знаем: на вечеринках всегда жарко. И эту традицию мы точно продолжим! 🔥
Я буду вашей музыкальной прислугой и сделаю всё, чтобы вы не замёрзли ни при каких обстоятельствах».
- Что в этот раз готовишь для нас?
- В последнее время вокруг мен…
❤️ КОНКУРС ❤️
разыгрываем:
🤍 2 билета на вечеринку 25 июля
🤍 набор DON’T TOUCH MY SKIN*
условия:
🔘подписка на канал Girls Make Noise
🔘нажать кнопку «Я в деле!»
результаты 25 июля в 18:00
✍️ отправляй бэстику, чтобы шанс на победу вдвоём у вас был больше
* в набор входит:
1) солнцезащитный крем Don’t Touch My Sunscreen SPF 50+
2) дезодорант
В полночь за пульт встанет ТАНЯ БОГДАНЯ.
Таня играла у нас один раз на GMN в Паверхаусе, на ГИЛТИ ПЛЕЖА будет играть впервые, мы заинтригованы тем, какой сет у неё будет 🎵
❤️ 00:00 - 01:00 — ТАНЯ БОГДАНЯ ❤️
Taniabogdania — московская DJ и селектор, участница независимой музыкальной сцены столицы и группы ШЫША
Taniabogdania регулярно выступает на вечеринках и культурных площадках Москвы, принимала участие в проект…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @girls_make_noise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GeekBrains @geekbrains_ru · 24,738 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Girls Make Noise” (@girls_make_noise), 1,951 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girls_make_noise.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.