2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:02
340
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:22
340
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 340 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
5 (26 June 2026 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
209
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈181
Links
≈365
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5307914974616648530
23
38.3%
custom 5406662633598243037
9
15.0%
custom 5422678085608684381
7
11.7%
custom 5348110100366107970
5
8.33%
custom 5382219601054544127
5
8.33%
custom 5402274834879124105
3
5.00%
custom 5417841943843459164
3
5.00%
custom 5415908877847793738
2
3.33%
custom 5469885784850972929
2
3.33%
custom 5346028553056040449
1
1.67%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Летний Маркет на Болотной
Проходила мимо Болотной и решила заглянуть на любимую площадку. Локация обновилась и как всегда выглядит привлекательно. Особенно радует большая программа мероприятий от йоги до экспресс-макияжа.
• Кинотеатр под открытым небом
• Московское чаепитие
• Фабрика подарков
• Декоративный бассейн
• Теннис, настольный и классический
• Уличный фуд-корт
• Уличная зона Яндекс-лавки с огромными «ягода…
ДОМ 21. В гостях у художников
В общем… ;) Очень я давно планировала попасть на выставку в «Зотов» ДОМ 21. По афише мне казалось, что эта выставка посвящена атмосфере дома: уюту, чаю, варенью, бабушкиным пирожкам … и всему, что ассоциируется с домом в принципе.
Но не тут-то было. Посвящена она действительно дому — но дому по конкретному адресу «Мясницкая 21». В начале XX века там сформировалась творческая коммуна х…
Карл Брюллов. «Всадница». Картина, которую сто лет понимали неправильно
Продолжаю серию постов «Ожившие полотна». Если вы были в Третьяковской галерее, то наверняка видели «Всадницу» Карла Брюллова. Это одна из самых известных картин русского искусства. Но целое столетие искусствоведы ошибались в том, кто на ней изображён.
Картину Брюллов написал в 1832 году в Италии. Заказчицей стала графиня Юлия Самойлова. Она бы…
Летние кинотеатры Москвы 2026
Бесплатно, по регистрации
Кинопорт от Kinopoisk
«Кинолето в «Зарядье»
Уютный Рихтер
Кинотеатр Okko на ВДНХ
Билеты
Стрелка. Кино. Кион | от 400 ₽
«Москино Музеон» | от 690 ₽
Остров мечты | от 800 ₽
Бесплатные кинопоказы в московских парках «Ходынское поле», «Покровский берег», «Митино», «Воронцово», 50-летия Октября и Саду имени Баумана в рамках «Лето в Москве» здесь
Брест - Несвиж - Минск
В прошлые выходные Мадам погружалась в белорусское гостеприимство. Поражалась идеальной чистоте дворов и улиц, трагической истории Брестской крепости, роскоши загородных замков и даже яхтенным прогулкам на минском море… о каждом городе будет отдельный рассказ с рекомендациями по посещению. А кому не терпится, можно задавать вопросы по Беларуси уже сейчас.
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @girlmag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мадам Телеграм” (@girlmag), 340 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlmag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
