Channel
@girlinmyeye
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
829subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003541057314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @girlinmyeye |
| Created | 4 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/girlinmyeye |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 829 | +40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 789 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 784 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 789 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 791 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 791 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 90.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#妮妮 @nini2560 硬件：19岁 身高158体重90不到，频道其他照片是网图，我选的这张应该是本人，相似度一般，颜值过得去，比较土气，皮肤黄皮，化妆技术一般，偏排骨精的身材，胸b-屁股没啥肉，总体硬件中偏上一点。 软件：态度比较好的土嫩妹，舌吻配合，除此以外服务水平一般，没有任何风尘气，比较土但是不精神，感觉可能是真的才下水，肉眼可见的非常紧张，听话，昆感比较紧，做爱感觉很压抑自己的反应，看起来像性经验不太多的样子，当然也不排除全是演技，不过我觉得体验起来还算不错，很有和普通害羞小妹做爱的感觉。 评级：乙中（5p这个价位过得去，刚下水的妹儿体验还是可以）
#海棠 @haitangbb 硬件：23岁的妹子，身高164左右，颜值如图，人照相似度8分，真人比照片要胖点，脸也有点长，肤质比较好挺光滑，肤色黄黑皮，身材没有照片那么好，但也是大长腿+翘臀，胸b，形状比较挺拔，整体硬件还行。 软件：态度挺好，没有风尘味，舌吻配合，昆感较紧，做爱反馈佳，不太耐日。 评级：乙下（7p这个价格对我来讲还是贵了点，但是总体算得上今年不错的御姐车） 更新：报魔兽头尾课可以减一，6p性价比挺不错
#橘喵 @Sq19i 人照9，身高160 体重110多，自聊的19岁东北妹妹，照片略显土气，看到真人却完全没这个感觉，穿着小裙子，完全算得上是甜妹，五官端正清秀，弯翘的双眼皮配上亮闪闪的眼睛，非常有亲和力，总体颜值蛮不错的，看上去俨然就是小蛋糕一枚 ，态度很好，进门后就笑意盈盈的打招呼，稍微有点东北腔但不会有禁欲感，简单交谈间得知妹妹是才下水，给了水费妹妹脱了衣服，看得出来稍微有点胖，肤色偏白，b+的脂肪胸，但不是特别挺拔，胸型一般，屁股很大，背后有大面积纹身，不算特别影响观感，总体身材对我这种排骨精爱好者而言是有点失望的，但好在肚子赘肉不明显，相对来讲算是微胖匀称体型的，陪洗过程非常仔细，服务意识强，有单方面被服饰的感觉，到床上后开始正式服务，口技挺不错，完全没有齿感，吞的不算深，有舔蛋，换成69姿势后，妹妹体质比较敏感，刺激豆豆会轻微发颤，玉足35码左右，小巧玲珑，把玩起来舒适，简单调情后下面已经一滩水了，迫不及待的挺身进入…
❤2🔥1
#糯米 @CDnuomi 频道都是网图，没啥好看的，开了有一段时间的老资格了，换过好几个名字，是doctor推的少数精品车。 去过两次，一次是小草莓时期，一次是糯米时期，糯米时期的颜值更精致一些，或许是更注意保养了吧，五官整体清秀，眼睛又大又亮，气质略普但不土气，肤质嫩滑，肤色偏白，身高162左右，体重80斤排骨精的同时有一对c+的大奶，简直是天赋异禀，略有下垂不算挺拔，但排骨精小矮矮能有这个尺寸已经相当的罕见了，没有舌吻只能亲嘴皮子，夺的过程有点死鱼，反馈一般紧度一般，足很玉，34码的小脚把玩起来爱不释手，硬件在7p里面属于非常顶的存在，软件整体只能算及格，总的来讲对我这种颜控算得上天菜了，必须好评。（有个减分点就是第二次去日久了分泌物有点腥味，妹子解释说是姨妈刚走导致的，不知真假，放在其他妹子上可能就直接进入我的黑名单了，但是她的硬件确实有点香！） 评价：乙上（软件过于一般了，但有成都学院折扣的可以无脑冲）
@luo75888 亡妻回忆录之右右，真名pu 桀骜不驯的20岁妹子一枚（老木木了），曝光台常驻嘉宾（谁让她素颜开课！）， 曾有名言“如果成都必须要这个（舌吻），那我不开也罢”，但后面还是老实接受舌吻了，人照相似度九成，真人颜值挺好的，五官秀气，套用嗦脚怪的形容“秀美男娘”，胸前纯纯飞机场，除了乳头之外没有一点脂肪，小屁股倒是翘翘的，虽然只有约莫152左右，但是腿比较显长，比例不错，服务我去的时候基本是一坨，口技一般，没有调情，但是做爱体验很好会像八爪鱼一样紧紧抱住你，多日一会倒也没啥怨言，由于非常符合本人审美癖好，忍着被下菜也去了整整八次，其中只有第一次有kiss 以及最后一次有舌吻，中间六次连亲嘴皮子都不行，一想到就气的想大喊“pu，退钱！”，5p这个价位按我个人审美颜值基本是天花板级别了的，胜过梦舒和白鹿（毕竟相对年轻不是），斯人已逝，现在已经半岸了，回不回来我都祝福她好，r.i.p..... 评级：尸体（回来了才会有评…
❤1
#清灵 原白鹿现在改名了，@qingling0806 自转代，藏楼坊老辈子名师，最早开5的时候真的是女菩萨，颜值高身材好，瘦且不柴，前凸后翘，态度稍微有点高冷但是做爱反馈很好也不催钟，除了不蛇之外基本没啥缺点，后面涨到6也还能接受，结婚两年后归来，怀孕生过了，年纪也大了还有妊娠纹，结果跑过来涨价开7，简直是把狼友当日本人整了，非常不推荐！ 评级：拉完了不予评级（曾经的水平加500的价格可以到甲中）
我的初代心尖尖，苏苏，目前上岸边缘，某探花视频女主角，看到的第一眼就爱上了，一周内回锅了两次，一个月内去了四次，98年的妹子，颜值真的很不错，照片所见即所得，皮肤白又嫩，胸b+小乳鸽形状挺，腰细但是屁股特别大，后入有臀浪做爱体验特别特别好，最喜欢的御姐没有之一，完全不催钟，做半小时也不会说什么，第一次去被秒还嫌我太快没法让她爽到，唯一一个让我有和女朋友做爱感觉的老师，每次都表现的很害羞，虽然有作秀的成分但我还是非常入戏！早期9pp的价格无敌，现在7p11pp也算优质，可惜基本上岸，俺也变成纯粹的嫩妹爱好者了，曾经沧海难为水，除却巫山不是云，呜呜，苏苏！ 评级：甲上（个人偏好加一级）
@Yz020202 心碎小猫 自聊 7/12 兼职车，每天开课较少，无露脸照，综合质量尚可的嫩妹，妆造衣品都比较在线，本人颜值也还行，偏高挑一点的身材，长腿+翘臀，胸虽然不大但是形状好看，手感嫩滑，肤色是最值得称道的亮点，冷白皮，白的发光，而且没啥疤痕痘痘，肤质观感不错，对我这种白皮爱好者而言可以狠狠加攻速，态度特别特别好，很耐心，口的认真而且手艺活精湛，很会刺激敏感点，舌吻配合，就算腿受伤了也没有推脱偷懒不想换姿势，做的时候能感觉到包裹感，紧度在线，抽插反馈很足，做爱配合度和体验在嫩妹里属于第一梯队了，对嫩妹爱好者而言推荐打卡，综合软硬件都不错而且没啥突出缺点。（ps:妹妹暂时只有上门，而且不太想跑太远） 评级：乙中（7p的价格竞争力不是特别强）
❤1
@cyh_123456789 双双 自聊，价位7/12，优质嫩妹，最早的名字叫锦鲤，当时是学生会开8的红牌，人照九，颜值挺符合我审美，皮肤稍微有点黑，胸不大但是挺，手感很润，性格乖巧态度好，笑起来非常甜，同时紧度很高，包裹感十足，叫声好听但有点演戏成分。昆感上乘 日感稍次但也不错。 ps：符文多，只有浅舌 评级：乙中(符文扣一级)
❤3
御姐篇有记忆点的暂时没有了，更点嫩妹，想起谁写谁
#糖果 @tangguo66778899 自聊，频道都是网图就不放照片了，这位也是木木，但是颜值还算不错，看得出来年轻的时候应该是小美女，老是老了点但是还算风韵犹存，身材也没太大毛病，技术和态度都很好，pp7张性价比不错，p5张就不太推荐，估计年龄有35➕了，确实看得出来岁月的痕迹。 评级：乙下(pp性价比泄火车，不介意木木的可以冲)
❤1
果果，@guoguo520188 自聊 某霸王工兵推荐的车，成都本地人不露脸，本人颜值凑合，但我不太喜欢，脸有点显老，实际年龄估计30➕，脸做过，除了感觉是木木之外没什么其他印象留存了。。。 评级：丙下(不算黑车但对我来讲没什么出色的点)
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @girlinmyeye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“无痛人流” (@girlinmyeye), 829 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlinmyeye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.