Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GIRLFRIEND

@girlfriends_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002505096393
TypeChannel
Username@girlfriends_ru
CreatedBetween 1 February 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/girlfriends_ru

Growth

11111 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 111 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:04 — 111 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:0112 Aug 2026, 14:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:04111no change
11 Aug 2026, 22:01111first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.5%
avg views ÷ 111 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held18 (12 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,785
Reactions total71
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52152481732823850641416.1%
💘1314.9%
👾1112.6%
custom 52449081737515085531011.5%
custom 53460363613065790551011.5%
😈89.20%
🆒55.75%
🦄55.75%
🔥33.45%
custom 545655515555197545022.30%
custom 545839816467339525022.30%
custom 522658870800995831511.15%
custom 545626360028701963111.15%
❤‍🔥11.15%
🍾11.15%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC268 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

➡️ᴋᴀᴄᴛинᴦ нᴀ учᴀᴄᴛниц ʙ ɢɪʀʟꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ⬅️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 !ⲧⲣⲉⳝⲟⲃⲁⲏυя! •Проживание в Санкт-Петербурге •Возможность перемещаться по городу 🌸 •платежеспособность ✨ •плюс минус свободный график на выходных🎀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🎀ᥲⲏⲕᥱⲧᥲ ⳝ𐔤ⲇᥱⲧ ᥒρᥱⲇ𐔖ᥴⲧᥲⲃ᥈ᥱⲏᥲ ⲃ ⲕ𐔖ⲙⲙᥱⲏⲧᥲρυяⲭ ⲕᥲᥴⲧυⲏ𐔏 ⲇ᥈υⲧᥴя ᥴ !31.07.2026-05.09.2026! 🌟🌟🌟🎀🎀🎀🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 52152481732823850642custom 52449081737515085531

29 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC125 viewsread 11 August 2026

Как мы писали ранее,нас покинул один человек,а именно группу покинула Ли. Ли заявила,что группа GIRLFRIEND ей не интересна,как ранее,также по её словам она нашла новую рупоп группу (там же состоит и Мила и Ли),где по мнению Ли будет больше продвижения,возможностей и у самой группы есть будущее. После того,как Ли заявила,что сама группа ей неинтересна,что она не видит будущего группы GIRLFRIEND,между участниками произ

29 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026

Так как написали всего один вопрос,на него мы ответим в следующий раз,когда будем проводить «вопрос-ответ»,а сейчас ждите пост.

26 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC105 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Проводим рубрику: Вопрос/ответ,писать-@Angelanonrubot Насчёт того,кто ушел и по какой причине сделаем отдельный пост,заранее благодарим за понимание

custom 52152481732823850644👾3custom 52449081737515085533

25 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC157 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Всем привет, мы к вам с плохими новостями. К сожалению наши обновления не связаны с чем-то хорошим. Одна из участниц ушла из группы.Мы раскроем вам больше информации ,когда все немного утихомириться и участницы согласятся на раскрытие деталей. На данный момент это все что мы модем сказать Также в скором времени будет набор на участницу.

custom 52152481732823850647💘4custom 52449081737515085533👾1🔥1🦄1

24 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC102 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Наши новые песни и часть концепта теперь будет связаны с нашим новым логотипом🤫

custom 52449081737515085533👾2💘2🔥2❤‍🔥1🍾1🆒1custom 52152481732823850641

20 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC163 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🌟✏️𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠✏️🌟 🎀ᴍɪʟᴀ(ɢɪʀʟꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ)🤩 🎀ʏᴏᴊɪ(ᴀ-ᴜʀᴀ)🤩 Post- 🙈🙈🙈 Name-ʟɪᴋᴇ sᴀᴋᴜʀᴀ 🌸 미라하고 여지🫀 🎀✏️✏️✏️✏️ 𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝙸 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚢 🎀✏️✏️✏️✏️ 𝙸 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚖 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚔𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚖

👾2💘2😈2custom 53460363613065790552🦄1custom 52265887080099583151

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @girlfriends_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Кто у вас биас в группе?

  1. Ли36%
  2. Саби32%
  3. Зоя36%
  4. Мила64%

The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 385,716 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GIRLFRIEND” (@girlfriends_ru), 111 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/girlfriends_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.