Channel
@gilanns
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001692381630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gilanns |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gilanns |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 364 | +7 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 357 | +11 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 346 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:44 | 347 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 348 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 346 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 348 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 348 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 347 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What are the Russians and the Middle East going to live on when no one wants the oil anymore?? The world is undergoing a massive upheaval that experts say we still don’t fuly understand. China and the rest of Asia are making huge progress electrifying transport. One expert says China is so irritated by US energy self-sufficiency that it has decided to get rid of oil. Global oil consumption is on the verge of a …
🇺🇸🇷🇺 The U.S. Senate just passed the Russia-Iran sanctions bill 86–11, opening the door to tariffs of up to 100% on major buyers of Russian energy. That is the part markets should focus on. The bill does not just sanction Moscow directly. It gives Trump the power to raise the cost of buying Russian oil and gas for countries such as India, China, Japan and parts of Europe. In practice: Russian barrels may still fi…
📈 Gulf oil flows are now climbing back toward 5.5M bpd in August, and the important part is how that recovery is happening. This is not a clean reopening of Hormuz. Instead, the system is slowly learning to operate around the disruption. More UAE, Saudi and Iraqi barrels are moving again, while Gulf of Oman ship to ship transfers are taking a larger role in keeping cargoes flowing without relying on the old logist…
Japan’s major oil company ENEOS has started producing synthetic fuel using CO₂ and hydrogen derived from water at its Yokohama facility. It currently produces about 1 barrel a day, but aims to scale to around 10,000 barrels per day by 2040.
🇺🇸 Donald Trump: ▪Cryptocurrency and AI: • Cryptocurrency is a big deal. I'm seeing more and more people paying with Bitcoin. It seems they're even forgetting about cash. • I don't want China to win the race in the field of cryptocurrency and AI technologies. • AI technologies could become more important than oil. • Whoever wins the race to lead in AI will win everything. It's extremely important. • I will be meetin…
❗️Satellite reconnaissance recorded numerous damages at the Yaroslavl Oil Refinery after the Ukrainian Defense Forces’ attack on the night of 7 August: technical overpasses, the VT-6 unit tank farm, the AVT-3 unit (likely from a previous strike), pumping stations, and a completely burned-down hangar of unknown type. Due to regular strikes by the Ukrainian forces, the plant is currently unable to operate at full capac…
🔥1
🇨🇳🛢️ China’s crude imports jumped 22% in July to 8.45M bpd, but they were still about 24% below July 2025. That makes the rebound look much less like a return to normal. June had collapsed to 7.12M bpd, the lowest level since 2016, so part of July’s jump was simply a recovery from an exceptionally weak base. What changed? Hormuz briefly became easier to cross after the mid-June U.S.-Iran understanding, allowing s…
🇺🇸🛢️ The U.S. imported 0 barrels of Saudi crude in July, the first full month at zero since 1985. Not because Washington suddenly stopped needing Middle Eastern oil. Because the Iran war physically rewired the trade. Hormuz disruption pushed Gulf barrels onto different routes, while U.S. refiners leaned harder on Canada, Latin America and Atlantic Basin crude. Now the reversal is starting. ↗️ Middle East imports…
🛢️📊 Saipem won about $6.4B of upstream contracts between Q3 2025 and Q2 2026, ahead of Subsea7 at $5.7B and Larsen & Toubro at $5.2 B But the more interesting story is where that backlog is coming from. Saipem’s lead is heavily tied to the Middle East, with additional exposure to Africa and Europe. That fits the current capex cycle: Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar are still pushing large offshore, gas and field dev…
Bye-bye, petrodollar.
U.S. imports of Saudi crude oil fall to zero for the first time since 1985.
🚨 Iran and China Just Launched the Final Attack on the Petrodollar System Iran’s parliament has introduced a Hormuz Management Bill: Ships from the US, Israel, and “hostile countries” face a total BAN from the Strait that carries 20% of the world’s oil. No exceptions. They’re already collecting transit fees in crypto and Chinese yuan. The IRGC’s earlier warning was crystal clear: if American forces don’t fully with…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gilanns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🛢WTI, Brent Crude Oil, NGAS Trading 📊” (@gilanns), 364 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gilanns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.