Channel
@giftpd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002353463440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @giftpd |
| Description | 购买@Jiabingege buy for @jiabingege |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/giftpd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 98 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 98 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 September 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
嘉宾 NFT礼物频道 pinned «收藏礼物nft价格表 普通随机最低价格 🐸青蛙pepe 1w起 ❤️🔥心锁3500u 🧢杜洛夫的帽子 2500u 🎁海盗手 178u 📎指尖手链688u 🎁力量手630u 🪖英雄头盔640u 🍑桃子 888u 💎星光碎片288u 🏆迷你奥斯卡388u 🎁贵族香水240u 🧪魔法药水200u 👄性感嘴唇122u 💎水晶柱228u 💍宝石印章 210u 💍粘结戒指 200u 🔠受惊的猫 140u 🧞♂️精灵灯130u 🎁LV挎包 266u 💀电动头颅 100u 🎁跑车 100u ⌚️手表 120u 🐸亲吻癞蛤蟆…»
收藏礼物nft价格表 普通随机最低价格 🐸青蛙pepe 1w起 ❤️🔥心锁3500u 🧢杜洛夫的帽子 2500u 🎁海盗手 178u 📎指尖手链688u 🎁力量手630u 🪖英雄头盔640u 🍑桃子 888u 💎星光碎片288u 🏆迷你奥斯卡388u 🎁贵族香水240u 🧪魔法药水200u 👄性感嘴唇122u 💎水晶柱228u 💍宝石印章 210u 💍粘结戒指 200u 🔠受惊的猫 140u 🧞♂️精灵灯130u 🎁LV挎包 266u 💀电动头颅 100u 🎁跑车 100u ⌚️手表 120u 🐸亲吻癞蛤蟆 90u 🚬雪茄 90u 🏍eko头盔 100u 🧸小熊 60u 😏疯狂南瓜 60u 📍诅咒娃娃 55u 💎钻石戒指49u 🌹永生花45u 🎩魔术帽 30u 🧹扫把 33u 😀钻戒 60u 🖤跳动的心35u 🔔铃铛 20u 🎵电唱机 35u 🔮水晶球28u 🎁雪茄狗20u 🎀领带结18u 🍓草莓盒18u 🍫巧克力盒17u…
卖了这么多 才想起来给自己整一个礼物墙 哈哈
Photo, posted without a caption
顶级配置 @Giftpd
NFT礼物专区 找我买自由挑选礼物 给你们挑选你们喜欢的编号 🎁#包包 💎#钻戒 🐍#小蛇 👋#姜饼 🗃#礼盒 🍑#桃子 🎁#城堡 🐸 #青蛙 🗓#日历 🎁#香水 🐍#蛇盒 🎁#小狗 🎁#汽车 🎁#手掌 🍄#DJ蘑菇 ⭐️#小星星 🌸 #小红花 🗒#魔法书 🧸#玩具熊 🎩#女巫帽 🎵 #唱片机 🥚#马塔蛋 🍹#香料酒 🍓#浆果糖 🎁#圣诞袜 🗡#激光剑 💍#粘合杯 🎀#蝴蝶结 🎁#礼品袋 🍽 #方便面 🍦#冰淇淋 🍵#六角罐 🎄 #圣诞花圈📍#巫毒娃娃 🍭#糖果手杖 💀#电动头颅 ❤️#魔法药水 🧹#魔法扫帚 ⌚️#瑞士手表 🚬#复古雪茄 🖤#受困的心 🎁#针织手套 💍#徽章戒指 🧪#爱情魔药 🕯#爱情蜡烛 🙂#疯狂南瓜 💎#离子宝石 🐰#果冻兔子 💎#星界碎片 🎇#派对烟花 🤡#杰克盒子 🧁#兔子松饼 🧞♂️#拉…
花里胡哨
Photo, posted without a caption
🐸
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
💰金色礼物墙！
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @giftpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 825,191 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“嘉宾 NFT礼物频道” (@giftpd), 98 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giftpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.