Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 52 days, net -1,125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,945–25,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 17:16
24,114
-122
19 Sept 2026, 17:20
24,236
-46
18 Sept 2026, 05:02
24,282
-21
17 Sept 2026, 09:01
24,303
-22
16 Sept 2026, 01:17
24,325
-16
15 Sept 2026, 05:38
24,341
-13
14 Sept 2026, 07:58
24,354
-26
13 Sept 2026, 15:00
24,380
-13
12 Sept 2026, 15:15
24,393
-23
11 Sept 2026, 19:17
24,416
-37
10 Sept 2026, 13:18
24,453
-25
9 Sept 2026, 09:16
24,478
-41
7 Sept 2026, 06:39
24,519
-17
6 Sept 2026, 00:00
24,536
-34
4 Sept 2026, 11:37
24,570
-4
3 Sept 2026, 18:41
24,574
-17
2 Sept 2026, 21:44
24,591
-4
2 Sept 2026, 12:52
24,595
-10
1 Sept 2026, 19:04
24,605
-12
1 Sept 2026, 11:26
24,617
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.27%
avg views ÷ 24,114 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.329%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
84 (28 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
61,843
Reactions total
164
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈254
Links
≈2,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
484 reactions across 63 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5465471829781024156
151
31.2%
custom 5467592572962635794
124
25.6%
custom 5465499356226421377
119
24.6%
custom 5467852517268290519
90
18.6%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
107
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 84 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @giftmafia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😳 СКАМЕРЫ НАУЧИЛИСЬ УГОНЯТЬ СЕССИИ МАРКЕТОВ
Юзеру предложили рекламу Minecraft-сервера и попросили скачать .jar-моды. Вместе с ними у него украли сессии Telegram и MRKT.
Левую сессию Telegram он быстро заметил и сбросил, поэтому решил, что всё обошлось. Но сессия MRKT у скамера осталась.
Спустя день жертве написал якобы крупный покупатель подарков: сначала специально купил 🎁 Precious Peach #1855 по оверпрайсу, что…
😳 BITGET ВЗЛОМАЛИ НА $350 МЛН
Этой ночью появились сообщения о крупной атаке на Bitget — хакеры получили доступ к нескольким кошелькам биржи и вывели активы примерно на $350 млн.
Доступ к кошелькам, как сообщается, уже восстановили, однако вывод средств временно ограничен до завершения проверки безопасности.
При этом фонд защиты Bitget оценивается примерно в $464 млн — заявляется, что этих резервов должно хватить …
🛫 СРАЗУ ТРИ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ УЖЕ НА ФИНИШЕ
Идейный аниматор из команды Telegram снова обновил карточку готовности улучшений - и там уже становится интереснее.
🎁 Кулоны готовы на 100% и, судя по всему, встали в очередь на релиз вместе с 🎁 Лампами. 🎁 Redo тоже почти на финише, а количество подготовленных вариаций для будущих скинов уже перевалило за 150 штук.
Ждёте?
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💎 GIFT MAFIA
💎 Купить подарки без КУС
🛡 Луч…
😳 130 ЗВЁЗД ОБОШЛИСЬ В 8 ЛЕТ СТРОГОГО РЕЖИМА
57-летнего жителя Тюмени приговорили к 8 годам колонии строгого режима из-за платных реакций в Telegram. Всего он отправил 130 ⭐️ на 292,99 ₽ в нескольких каналах.
По версии обвинения, эти каналы были связаны с «пропагандой терроризма и поддержкой террористических организаций», поэтому переводы через звёзды квалифицировали как финансирование терроризма. Дело рассматрива…
🛫 ЗВЁЗДНЫЕ РЕАКЦИИ ХОТЯТ СПРЯТАТЬ ОТ ПОСТОРОННИХ
Правозащитники обратились к Павлу Дурову с просьбой сделать реакции за ⭐️ звёзды - анонимными по умолчанию.
Поводом стали участившиеся в России уголовные дела, где платные реакции в Telegram фигурируют как часть обвинений — иногда речь идёт о суммах всего в несколько сотен рублей.
Теперь Дурову предлагают скрыть данные отправителей таких реакций, чтобы снизить риск …
😳 ИСТОРИЯ СО СКАМЕРШЕЙ ПОЛУЧИЛА ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ
Помните 19-летнюю Иониту, которая, по данным источников, знакомилась с владельцами дорогих Telegram-подарков, вытаскивала их на встречи, после чего в дело подключались подельники — со слежкой, угрозами и поджогами?
Девушка находится в СИЗО уже больше 10 месяцев, а теперь к делу добавилось ещё одно тяжёлое обвинение — похищение человека.
Ранее ей вменяли вымогательство в …
🛫 КРУЖКИ В TELEGRAM СКОРО СТАНУТ НАМНОГО ЛУЧШЕ
В свежей бете Telegram начали тестировать отдельные настройки для записи видеосообщений — теперь качество кружков можно будет настраивать вручную.
Среди новых параметров:
🔵 качество — 360p или 480p
🔵 камера — высокое, среднее или низкое разрешение
🔵 частота — 30 или 60 FPS
🔵 битрейт — от 750 кбит/с до 2 Мбит/с
🔵 формат — кружки можно сделать даже квадратными
Имба?
➖➖➖…
📢 НОЧНОЙ АБУЗ ПОДАРКОВ
Этой ночью неизвестный кошелёк начал абузить баг против тех, кто использует автоскуп дешёвых NFT-подарков.
Схема выглядела так: подарок выставляли ниже флора, бот моментально его покупал, продавцу прилетали GRAM, но сам гифт каким-то образом оставался у него. После этого всё повторялось заново.
По предварительной версии, проблема может быть связана с front-run уязвимостью, когда несколько тр…
📈 25 ГИФТОВ УЖЕ НА НОВЫХ ХАЯХ
За последние 3 месяца рынок заметно подрос — сразу 25 подарков обновили свои исторические максимумы и прямо сейчас торгуются на пиковых значениях.
🎁 Fresh Socks — $6.7 (+49%)
🎁 Chill Flame — $5.5 (+49%)
🎁 Ice Cream — $5.5 (+45%)
🎁 Vice Cream — $5.5 (+45%)
🎁 Liberty Figure — $6.5 (+44%)
🎁 Scared Cat — $374 (+40%)
🎁 Snoop Cigar — $21 (+40%)
🎁 Money Pot — $7 (+40%)
🎁 Mood Pack — $6.1 (+39…
🛫 GRAM WALLET УЖЕ МОЖНО ПОТЕСТИТЬ
В свежей бете Telegram для macOS появился интерфейс будущего Gram Wallet — пока без рабочего функционала, но сам кошелёк уже можно открыть и посмотреть, как он будет выглядеть.
Это первый раз, когда Telegram фактически дал пользователям публично заглянуть внутрь кошелька до полноценного релиза.
Круто выглядит?
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💎 GIFT MAFIA
💎 Купить подарки без КУС
🛡 Лучший гарант-серви…
📈 КОТЫ ОБОШЛИ ПЕРСИКИ ПО ФЛОРУ
🐈⬛ Scared Cat впервые стали дороже Precious Peach и поднялись на 6-е место среди коллекций — или на 4-е, если не считать недавние кубки.
Самое интересное — разница в саплае: котов около 19 000, а персиков всего ~3 000. То есть Scared Cat в обращении примерно в 6 раз больше, но по цене они уже впереди.
А ведь когда-то коты продавались всего за 25 ⭐️ (~$0.38).
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💎 GIFT MAFI…
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @giftmafia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GIFT MAFIA” (@giftmafia), 24,114 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/giftmafia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.