6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 19:44
556
+71
20 Aug 2026, 22:57
485
+7
14 Aug 2026, 17:23
478
+4
8 Aug 2026, 08:50
474
-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:35
475
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:14
475
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.85%
avg views ÷ 556 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
14 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
131
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
10
31.3%
❤
8
25.0%
🔥
7
21.9%
😁
4
12.5%
👏
2
6.25%
👌
1
3.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gift_code_pay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤌 Без передачи аккаунта и сомнительных схем.
В Gift-Code вы получаете официальную подарочную карту, самостоятельно активируете код и пополняете свой Apple ID. Быстро и понятно.
Доступ к аккаунту остается только у вас. Мы не просим логин и пароль, не заходим в Apple ID и не предлагаем рискованные «обходные пути».
Сейчас покупку можно сделать выгоднее: введите промокод LETO при оформлении и получите скидку -7% на по…
☀️ Скидка 7% на все карты пополнения
Планировали продлить iCloud, оплатить подписки или пополнить баланс для будущих покупок? Сейчас это можно сделать выгоднее.
До 17 августа включительно промокод LETO дает скидку 7% на все карты – для любого региона и номинала.
Выберите нужную карту, введите промокод во время покупки – и получите код автоматически за пару минут.
Промокод можно использовать неограниченное количес…
📱 Apple готовит крупнейшее обновление линейки Mac за последние годы
По данным Bloomberg, в течение ближайших двух лет компания планирует обновить практически все модели компьютеров. Первые новинки могут показать уже осенью 2026 года 👇
— Базовый 14-дюймовый MacBook Pro с чипом M6
— Обновленный iMac
— Новые Mac mini и Mac Studio
В конце 2026-го или начале 2027 года ожидаются полностью переработанные MacBook Pro на 1…
🌍 Нужный регион. Подходящий номинал. Пара минут – и ваш баланс пополнен.
Подарочные карты Apple для аккаунтов России, США и Турции. Выбирайте сумму под конкретную покупку или пополняйте баланс с запасом – без долгого ожидания и сложных схем.
Код придет автоматически после оплаты. Останется только активировать его в App Store и оплатить приложения, игры, подписки или iCloud.
👉 Выбрать регион и номинал
В App Store вдвое больше новинок. Скачиваний – всего на 2%
За первые шесть месяцев 2026 года в App Store вышло около 560 тыс. новых приложений – почти столько же, сколько за весь 2025-й. Если темп сохранится, за год магазин пополнится более чем миллионом приложений. Это станет новым рекордом.
Всплеск связывают с вайб-кодингом. ИИ-инструменты помогают собирать приложения людям без опыта в разработке. Порог входа сни…
Собрали шесть атмосферных обоев для iPhone: облака, звезды, горы и немного космического вайба. Выбирайте подходящие под настроение и сохраняйте в оригинальном качестве.
Файлы в комментариях 👇
В iOS 27 Apple взялась не только за новые функции, но и за скорость системы.
По тестам компании 👇
— Приложения запускаются до 30% быстрее
— Новые снимки загружаются в «Фото» до 70% быстрее
— Передача файлов через AirDrop ускорилась до 80%
Быстрее должны работать Камера, Safari, Почта, Музыка, Spotlight, NFC, распознавание текста и загрузка снимков в iCloud.
Самое интересное: прирост скорости запуска приложений Ap…
Если встроенной памяти iPhone уже не хватает, расширить ее не получится. Остается менять смартфон на версию с накопителем побольше или перенести фото и видео в iCloud.
Тарифы iCloud+ для российского Apple ID 👇
— 50 ГБ – 59 ₽ в месяц или 708 ₽ в год
— 200 ГБ – 149 ₽ в месяц или 1 788 ₽ в год
— 2 ТБ – 599 ₽ в месяц или 7 188 ₽ в год
Самый практичный вариант – 200 ГБ. Даже за пять лет подписка обойдется в 8 940 ₽, чт…
Проверьте баланс. Apple повысила цены на подписки
Изменения затронули два популярных региона Apple ID – США и Турцию.
🇺🇸 Для американских аккаунтов подорожала Apple Music 👇
— Индивидуальная подписка – с $10,99 до $11,99
— Семейная – с $16,99 до $19,99
— Студенческая – с $5,99 до $6,99
Apple One Family теперь стоит $27,95 вместо $25,95, а Premier – $39,95 вместо $37,95. При этом цены на iCloud+ в США пока не измени…
❌ Проблемы с доступом в App Store
Пользователи из разных регионов России жалуются на доступность магазина приложений Apple. У некоторых не открываются ссылки и не обновляются приложения.
Доступность сайта опустилась примерно до 30-40% 🫠
⚡ Apple подала в суд на OpenAI
Компания утверждает, что OpenAI систематически получала коммерческие тайны через бывших сотрудников Apple и использовала их при разработке собственных устройств. В иске фигурируют два экс-сотрудника, а Apple требует компенсацию и запрет на использование конфиденциальных данных. OpenAI обвинения отвергает.
Пока Apple и OpenAI выясняют, кто у кого что забрал, проверьте, не забрали ли по…
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @gift_code_pay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gift-Code | App Store, подписки и сервисы” (@gift_code_pay), 556 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gift_code_pay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.