Video, posted without a caption

Channel
GHYENA
@ghyenaband
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001720283751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghyenaband |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghyenaband |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 120 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 118 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 118 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.6%
- avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.7
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (20 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 257 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5370740287343702328 | 25 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5377859715327860884 | 21 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5285518996500684311 | 12 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5326043924198859986 | 11 | 9.02% | |
| custom 5467817496104946125 | 4 | 3.28% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Фестиваль темного хардкора и метала в Цоколе сегодня! GHYENA сыграют свежий материал в обновленном составе, IMGVN впервые выступят в Санкт-Петербурге, мощную поддержку окажут Disbound и Pallea. 18+ Билеты: 0808.ticketscloud.org
custom 53260439241988599866custom 52855189965006843113🔥2❤1
Футболки "Топь" будут доступны к приобретению завтра на гиге в Цоколе. Размеры: L, XL, 2XL. Цена: 2000 рублей.
custom 53778597153278608846
GHYENA вернулись с новым материалом и составом! Мы разыграем пригласительные на концерт 8 августа в Санкт-Петербурге. Для участия необходимо: • подписаться на мёртвых собак лай • подписаться на raw sun Победителей будет три, каждый получит по два билета на концерт. Результаты 5 августа! Удачи!
custom 53707402873437023284❤1custom 54678174961049461251
08.08 IMGVN • GHYENA • Pallea • Disbound 🎟 Билеты здесь 📍Zoccolo 2.0 📍Санкт-Петербург, Лиговский пр. 50П 🗓️ 8 августа, суббота 🕘 Начало в 19:00 18+
custom 53707402873437023287❤5custom 54678174961049461252
6 сентября поддержим сибиряков SHADOWMOOR, которые посетят северную столицу в рамках своего тура в компании с чёрными рокерами Длань из Череповца. Встреча ВК 🎟 Билеты здесь 📍Ласточка 📍Транспортный Переулок 10А 🗓 6 сентября, воскресенье 🕘 Начало в 19:00 16+
❤7🔥4custom 53707402873437023283custom 52855189965006843111
Нашему дебютному альбому «Мать» уже почти четыре года. Недавно один из треков с него прозвучал на подкасте, и мы решили воспользоваться случаем, чтобы рассказать об одной детали нашей истории. Альбом «Мать» был записан с вокалистом Сергеем. Именно его вокал звучит на этом релизе. Мы рекомендуем вам ознакомиться с творчеством группы Сергея Gnot, в которой он является вокалистом, гитаристом и идейным вдохновителем, ка…
❤12custom 53707402873437023283🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52855189965006843118🔥4
🐾🐾🐾Слушать на всех площадках🐾🐾🐾
custom 53778597153278608848🔥6custom 53260439241988599865custom 54678174961049461251
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ghyenaband. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,783 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@deaddogs_barking · 7,2522 postsraw sun
@rawsunbooking · 1,1902 postsАЛХИМИЯ
@amgzn · 1,3161 postBLACK ACID
@BLACKACIDprod · 2031 post🪦DISBOUND
@disbound_punks · 831 postDOGMEAT BOOKING
@dogmeat_booking_25 · 801 postI M G V N
@imgvnart · 741 postБар МО[ТРИ]
@mo_yeti · 3,6821 postPAllEA
@palleamusic · 481 postSEKTAT
@sektat_band · 1131 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GHYENA” (@ghyenaband), 120 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghyenaband.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.