Channel
@ghostinnft
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690367211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghostinnft |
| Description | We're a team of serial daters whose characteristics are inherited by social factors, not by choice. 2345 unique NFTs hand drawn by Korean artist songpyun. http://ghostin.xyz 👻 TG Ghost chat: https://t.co/kLJjFJyP5e 👀 |
| Created | 24 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghostinnft |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 14 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 14 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 38.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2022 to 1 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👻 Hey Ghosts! Join our Twitter Spaces at 18:00 UTC on August 2nd for a chat! 🗨 Topic of Discussion: Why is Ghostin' so common in today's dating scene? https://twitter.com/GhostinNFT/status/1554228611007320070?s=20&t=C2lQvTxs4tThmgloYnjHZg
You messaged your crush to set up a date for a sunny day this week but they are Ghostin’ you. What do you do? 🤔 https://twitter.com/ghostinnft/status/1548049313565007872
👀 How many of you out there wondering if you need glasses? 😂 https://twitter.com/GhostinNFT/status/1547657356351221760
😁2
Unique #NFT utility you won't find anywhere else. Each NFT from @GhostinNFT will unlock a private coaching session to improve your dating life! 😊 https://twitter.com/GhostinNFT/status/1547581769859313665
❤3👍1
😤 We all need to recognize that those who Ghost us simply aren't worth our time! 💔 https://twitter.com/GhostinNFT/status/1547002931689447425
👏4
Good morning/evening/afternoon!❤️ How is everyone doing today? Don’t be a Ghost, share how you feel! 😊
♥️ Don't let anyone stop you from being yourself. #GhostinNFT https://twitter.com/GhostinNFT/status/1546645516880060425
🤔 What is the most popular reason that people date? Pick one below or reply with your answer!👇 https://twitter.com/ghostinnft/status/1546594150258249728
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Join us for another Ghostin Twitter Spaces chat! Today at 2pm ET 👻✨ https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ynJOZwmbBZGR
👍1
The first Ghostin blog post is up!! 🤩 https://www.ghostin.xyz/post/welcome-to-ghost-talk-official-ghostin-nft-blog
❤2
Have a Ghost story to share? 👀 Let’s talk about it in the chat: https://t.me/+PZ_d-j_faupmN2E6
The collection is a tribute to all those “ghosts” out there who we’ve encountered in real life or dating sites. You can collect a ghost as closure for the pain you felt when you were ghosted. We have 2345 Ghostin NFTs for sale launcing this summer 👻
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ghostinnft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 What is the most popular reason that people date? Pick one below or reply with your answer!👇 https://twitter.com/ghostinnft/status/1546594150258249728
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2022 to 1 August 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,093,232 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ghostin | NFT Collection” (@ghostinnft), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghostinnft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.