Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GHOSTEL PATNER

@ghostelpatner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731200914
TypeChannel
Username@ghostelpatner
Created9 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ghostelpatner

Growth

37 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:333no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:453first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉250.0%
👍250.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2022 to 27 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jan 2023, 11:45 UTC260 viewsread 13 August 2026

Collaboration jj @OFCGHOSTHOTEL : 1. @DOMILOUSQ 2. @SAO244OFC 3. @CRYSTANSQ 4. @OFCWELFORD 5. @ClRCLE20 6. @NEOCTSPAOFC 7. @OFCGALAXTOR 8. @OFCRAMONDA 9. @MACVJEST 10. @VOLORIOUS_OFC 11. @OFCVENDALASAR 12. @ofcceterwauling 13. @OFCRAKALA 14. @TAEKOOKRIVALS 15. @JAEROSECENTURY 16. @ofcarestergank 17. @OFCGARIUS 18. @ofctaekookhome 19. @EAGLEREDD 20. @OFCEXILEWARRIOR 21. @OFCORAVEST 22. @OFCMENTRICH 23. @OFCMISTERKTH 2

25 Sept 2022, 05:14 UTC292 viewsread 13 August 2026

Collaboration JJ @OFCGHOSTHOTEL :: 1. @SECRETRACEROFC 2. @OFCLOWELAUFT 3. @ofcerz 4. @OFCLNC 5. @SUGARTAENNIEOFC 6. @SUGARVKOOKOFC 7. @MACVJEST 8. @CIBOYSQ 9. @CAR0USELWORLD 10. @OFCVIGOROUSS 11. @KJNTHVOFC 12. @Ofcrepnaye 13. @OFCWERDELINUS 14. @OFCVINCENT 15. @ofczagreus 16. @ofcimmortal 17. @DPRMariner 18. @OFCCETERWAULING 19. @ofcbergin 20. @BINGOOFCSQ 21. @drahoslavsq 22. @OFCREVELORDGANK 23. @OFCFUKUROSQ 24. @

6 Aug 2022, 12:45 UTC460 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

partner collaborasi @OFCGHOSTHOTEL :: [ 7 Agustus 2022 ] 1. @predatory_ofc 2. @castrumvkook 3. @kotajaehyunofc 4. @GKTHMU 5. @OFCBIKERS 6. @OFCZAGREUS 7. @AreaOutlawys 8. @drunkzone 9. @OFCAGENTKJRJ 10. @ENHYPZONE 11. @JJHVILLAGE 12. @OFCWOLFCLAWS 13. @OFCJARGLOSS 14. @NorbertHospital_ofc 15. @MarkasXXI 16. @BINGOOFCSQ 17. @REVOLSGANK 18. @ofcJjaeyongcity 19. @taegdaeboys 20. @OFCLOGAROU 21. @ofcperfeccionbangtan 22

🎉2

10 May 2022, 05:29 UTC847 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Mensive Kolaborasi Konten Special With :: 1. @OFCSUGARDUDA 2. @OFCLYLAND @OFCLYSANDER @OFCLEYSAA 3. @OFCKINETIX 4. @ofcdrakoulas 5. @OFCR0YALEAGLE 6. @JTAEROSENATION 7. @VJANECITY 8. @OFCSUGARRICH 9. @OFCVZENZAERO 10. @CRYSTANSQ 11. @ofcagentkjrj 12. @ofcorvio 13. @repnamja 14. @ofctaekooksupremacy 15. @OFCALESTRA 16. @KOMPLOTAN57 17. @KOMPLEKRPK 18. @ofclesehanbunda73 19. @onesparta 20. @CYBERLAWCH 21. @DOMILOUSQ 2

👍2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ghostelpatner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 965,684 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GHOSTEL PATNER” (@ghostelpatner), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghostelpatner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.