Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 04:09
224
+3
16 Aug 2026, 14:13
221
-12
8 Aug 2026, 10:04
233
no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:53
233
+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:59
232
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
311 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5843554051341422500
79
25.4%
❤
36
11.6%
custom 5436356005963262543
34
10.9%
custom 5278775425399559750
31
9.97%
custom 5190441829455126783
30
9.65%
custom 5276338018574174136
29
9.32%
custom 5368766307489571314
21
6.75%
custom 5278389694386706091
20
6.43%
custom 5357447788764366583
14
4.50%
custom 5251247300667283162
12
3.86%
custom 5337292117129592063
4
1.29%
custom 5285372886008239379
1
0.322%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
87
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 8 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ghost_of_umbrella. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У меня назревает серьёзный вопрос...
-「Сделал я вчера закосик, так сказать, на Зимнего Солдата и... Святой потенциал, теперь хочу делать его прямо сейчас」😊
-「Но у меня ещё Ханк не "выгулян", вот я и думаю: делать Баки и подавать его на Суперкон, соло дефиле (у меня уже есть идеи для выступления) или найти Аду и подать Ханка на групповое?」
Хочу узнать ваше мнение, проголосуйте, пожалуйста, реактами 🙏
🦾 - делать Зимн…
☂️ Принимаю сезонную эстафету от 🤩 Рыжика и 🌟 Марка Паркера
‹‹Нужно собрать эстетичный коллаж для персонажа, которого вы делали последним, и передать это задание 4-м вкусняшкам»
ㅤ
Передаю сладким:
🏁 Жизнегорск | Окейт
🔰 Korsakova | Riya
😒 ВелCum ту ASSgard | Loki
🪑 Зыс из павер(Kærar) | Kærar
Вы можете спросить "почему экскаватор?"
Из-за разгрузки схсхсхс, меня прикалывает что она жёлтая
🔴 Щп-канал
🔴 Чат получения
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ✍️✍️✍️✍️
☂️ Human
☂️ Unit
☂️ Never
☂️ Killed
"He's not afraid of death. He's grim reaper itself"
🔴Дальше будут мысли, читать не обязательно:
Большой
Шлем большой (и это учитывая что он надевается с трудом и прям впритык по всем фронтам
Из-за этого он кажется большеватым, в соотношении к телу (по сравнению с оригинальным артом Ханка), а значит это слегка проблема
Буду решать её с помощью увеличения пара…
Там Shaggy запустила флешмоб "От первого косплей образа до последнего"
А я косплеер так то, надо участвовать💪
(Намекаю что вам надо тоже)
Я в косплее всего год, пока хвастаться особо нечем
Забавно то, что по сути я вернулся к тому с чего начал, просто сделав это лучше и детальнее👌
ㅤ
Ну и мысля теперь такая, что у меня теперь будет свой каноничный ивент - каждый летний Тенши возвращаться в 🤩Гоусте, но уже в иных вари…
ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤТОРТУГА!ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ
🫥3⃣ дня назад хорошие люди из косбенда “По Факту!" пригласили меня активно отдохнуть в их компании, от чего я отказался не мог отказаться😁
🫥🔤чера меня усыпили, связали и увезли мы прокатились до тематического парка отдыха Тортуга, по пути заехав на мраморный карьер, наделали крутых фоток, получили хороших эмоций, пошутили и пообщались
Спасибо им всем огромное, ребята/девч…
ㅤ ㅤ💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Давайте посмотрим на мои ближайшие коспланы, а то как Кощей яйцо (своё), я кропотливо скрываю их🤫
☂️ 1. Ханк (Resident Evil 2 Remake)
Планирую своё групповое дефиле на осенний СК в Красноярске, возможно его же, с малым шансом, подам в групповое на зимний Тенши (всё с Адой)🤩
👀 2. Секретный персонаж
Персонаж массового группового дефиле на осенний СК, а так же мой любимчик (как и многих)
Анонс будет ближе…
Есть такое ощущение будто...
Я забыл про отзыв на Тенши
АХТУНГ! ДЛИННОПОСТ!
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ🔤🔤
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
😏Давайте по пунктам:
1. Общие впечатления
2. О вас
3. Обо мне и коспланах
4. Спец. приз
5. Всякое p.s.
🟢1. Общие впечатления
Жарко было, согласен, но не смертельно🙂
Косплееры - класс, уровень выступлений - красота, костюмы - имба, интерес приходить сюда - не исчезнет
А вот ярмарка в этот раз тоска, очень м…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ghost_of_umbrella. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ghost_of_umbrella named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ruzuuhek_cosp named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 29 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@tsainaka96 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤАкихабараㅤ𝙑 ㅤ” (@ghost_of_umbrella), 224 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghost_of_umbrella.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.