Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 港惠沫沫抓🐉95 98

Channel

港惠沫沫抓🐉95 98

@ghmomozlj11

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

335subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 13 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004480689538
TypeChannel
Username@ghmomozlj11
Created2 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 October 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghmomozlj11

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

306341323.513 October 2026 — 306 subscribers13 October 2026 — 306 subscribers14 October 2026 — 324 subscribers20 October 2026 — 341 subscribers28 October 2026 — 335 subscribers33513 October 202628 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 301–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 13:35335-6
20 Oct 2026, 23:18341+17
14 Oct 2026, 13:37324+18
13 Oct 2026, 21:22306no change
13 Oct 2026, 20:47306first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.7%
avg views ÷ 335 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.625%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held6 (2 July 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total613
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

🎉 沫沫的半价 🎁 奖品清单 • (@ghmomozlj)1p半价 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 惠州出击大队3.0群 • 加入 惠州出击大队2.0群 • 加入 惠州惠城出击大队 • 加入 惠州惠城公开榜 • 加入 港惠沫沫抓🐉95 98 • 需消耗积分:5 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:100积分 • 祝福上限:无上限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-10-19 18:30:00 📜 抽奖说明 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计! 再次重申:灌水无意义发言都不兑奖!请用心交流。 活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 中奖的12小时内联系管理员领取 @Ajk1233 24小时内预约时间,72小时内出击,过时自动作废 炸号作废放回奖池重新抽奖 用了优惠劵要写报告! ✨ 愿命运…

❤1

13 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC150 viewsread 13 October 2026
Photo

花名:#沫沫 坐标:#港惠 车费:# 95➕口爆/500/50分钟 抓龙筋500/60分 钟 抓龙筋+口胸足 7张 100分钟不限制次数 800抓龙+口爆100分钟不限制次数 600/1p 60分钟 1200/2p 100分钟 抓龙筋+98/1200💰100分钟 服务内容:催眠式全身SPA+泰国秘抓筋+前列腺保养精油开背+肩部推拿+臀疗,脱敏治疗法+手指探肛+抓龙筋+寸止+龟头责边控+边缘埪制三起三落+抓鸡+抓蛋蛋+抓三角区经络络 💦鸳鸯浴 🐍吻 👅69 🐻推 舔蛋蛋 舔咪咪 舌头环绕吹萧 口爆 深🐒 毒🐲 丝袜制服诱惑 💖激情爱爱 标签:#舌吻 #69 #毒龙 #抓龙筋 私聊:@ghmomozlj 频道:https://t.me/ghmomozlj11

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ghmomozlj11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“港惠沫沫抓🐉95 98” (@ghmomozlj11), 335 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghmomozlj11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.